[局部使用万古霉素对预防腰骶部手术部位感染的作用]。

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2024-03-01
F Revilla-Pacheco, L Rivera-May, S Manrique-Guzmán, T Herrada-Pineda, I Hoyo, J Franco-Granillo, A K Perez-Vazquez, M J Wilches-Dávalos
{"title":"[局部使用万古霉素对预防腰骶部手术部位感染的作用]。","authors":"F Revilla-Pacheco, L Rivera-May, S Manrique-Guzmán, T Herrada-Pineda, I Hoyo, J Franco-Granillo, A K Perez-Vazquez, M J Wilches-Dávalos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>surgical site infections (SSI) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and one of the most representative causes of nosocomial infections. The use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spine surgery is a potential prophylactic measure against SSI; however, evidence regarding its efficacy is contradictory. Our study was designed to research if intrawound vancomycin significantly prevents SSI in lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>this is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial; 233 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery, were randomly assigned to a group in which intrawound vancomycin was instilled in the incision before closure (109), or to a control group (114). The main outcome is the presence of SSI; we determined its prevalence and searched for difference between groups for association between SSI and independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>global SSI prevalence was 1.8%, in the experimental group was 0.9%, in the control group was 2.6%. There was no significant difference between these values, p = 0.622. The relative risk of SSI in the experimental group was 0.35 (95% CI 0.037-3.30), that of the control group was 2.87 (95% CI 0.30-27.16). The number needed to treat is 58.3. We did not find a significant association between the independent variables studied and the appearance of SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>we did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of SSI between groups nor a significant association between SSI and independent variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"38 2","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Utility of topical vancomycin application in the prevention of surgical site infection of the lumbosacral spine].\",\"authors\":\"F Revilla-Pacheco, L Rivera-May, S Manrique-Guzmán, T Herrada-Pineda, I Hoyo, J Franco-Granillo, A K Perez-Vazquez, M J Wilches-Dávalos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>surgical site infections (SSI) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and one of the most representative causes of nosocomial infections. The use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spine surgery is a potential prophylactic measure against SSI; however, evidence regarding its efficacy is contradictory. Our study was designed to research if intrawound vancomycin significantly prevents SSI in lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>this is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial; 233 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery, were randomly assigned to a group in which intrawound vancomycin was instilled in the incision before closure (109), or to a control group (114). The main outcome is the presence of SSI; we determined its prevalence and searched for difference between groups for association between SSI and independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>global SSI prevalence was 1.8%, in the experimental group was 0.9%, in the control group was 2.6%. There was no significant difference between these values, p = 0.622. The relative risk of SSI in the experimental group was 0.35 (95% CI 0.037-3.30), that of the control group was 2.87 (95% CI 0.30-27.16). The number needed to treat is 58.3. We did not find a significant association between the independent variables studied and the appearance of SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>we did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of SSI between groups nor a significant association between SSI and independent variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"73-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:手术部位感染(SSI)仍然是发病率和死亡率的重要原因,也是最具代表性的院内感染原因之一。在腰椎手术中使用鞘内万古霉素是一种潜在的预防 SSI 的措施,但有关其疗效的证据却相互矛盾。材料与方法:这是一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验;233 名接受腰椎手术的患者被随机分配到在缝合前将万古霉素灌入切口组(109 例)或对照组(114 例)。主要结果是出现 SSI;我们确定了 SSI 的流行率,并寻找各组之间 SSI 与自变量之间关联的差异。这些数值之间没有明显差异,P = 0.622。实验组的 SSI 相对风险为 0.35(95% CI 0.037-3.30),对照组为 2.87(95% CI 0.30-27.16)。需要治疗的人数为 58.3。我们没有发现所研究的自变量与 SSI 的出现之间有明显的关联。结论:我们没有发现各组之间 SSI 发病率有明显差异,也没有发现 SSI 与自变量之间有明显关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Utility of topical vancomycin application in the prevention of surgical site infection of the lumbosacral spine].

Introduction: surgical site infections (SSI) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and one of the most representative causes of nosocomial infections. The use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spine surgery is a potential prophylactic measure against SSI; however, evidence regarding its efficacy is contradictory. Our study was designed to research if intrawound vancomycin significantly prevents SSI in lumbar spine surgery.

Material and methods: this is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial; 233 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery, were randomly assigned to a group in which intrawound vancomycin was instilled in the incision before closure (109), or to a control group (114). The main outcome is the presence of SSI; we determined its prevalence and searched for difference between groups for association between SSI and independent variables.

Results: global SSI prevalence was 1.8%, in the experimental group was 0.9%, in the control group was 2.6%. There was no significant difference between these values, p = 0.622. The relative risk of SSI in the experimental group was 0.35 (95% CI 0.037-3.30), that of the control group was 2.87 (95% CI 0.30-27.16). The number needed to treat is 58.3. We did not find a significant association between the independent variables studied and the appearance of SSI.

Conclusions: we did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of SSI between groups nor a significant association between SSI and independent variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信