一项随机平行设计研究,比较两种不同的牙间隙清洁方式在家庭使用 4 周后对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。

JingRu Li, Farah Mirza, Melissa Nelson, Jessica Foster, Pejmon Amini, Umar Imtiaz, Marilyn Ward
{"title":"一项随机平行设计研究,比较两种不同的牙间隙清洁方式在家庭使用 4 周后对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。","authors":"JingRu Li, Farah Mirza, Melissa Nelson, Jessica Foster, Pejmon Amini, Umar Imtiaz, Marilyn Ward","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study objective was to evaluate the effect of two different interdental oral cleaning modalities on gingivitis and plaque following a 4-week period of home use. This was a randomized, parallel, single-blinded study. Subjects were routine manual toothbrush (MTB) users with moderate to severe gingivitis, aged 18 to 65 years. Subjects were required at baseline to have a gingival bleeding score of ≥1 on at least 50 gingival sites per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and to have an overall plaque score of ≥0.6 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) following a 3- to 6-hour plaque accumulation period. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the oral care cleaning modalities: (1) NON group: MTB alone, (2) IDB group: MTB plus an interdental brush, or (3) MPF group: MTB plus a Philips® Sonicare® Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle. All subjects used the MTB with fluoride toothpaste. Efficacy measures (Modified Gingival Index [MGI], GBI, and RMNPI) and safety were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 4 as measured by the MGI. A total of 189 subjects were randomized and 186 completed the study. The adjusted mean percent reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 4 was 2.80% for the NON group, 11.32% for the IDB group, and 20.87% for the MPF group. The differences between the MPF group and the NON and IDB groups were statistically significant (.0001). In conclusion, use of the MTB with the Philips Sonicare Power Flosser showed statistically significant benefits compared to an MTB alone and an MTB used with an interdental brush in reducing gingival inflammation following 4 weeks of home use.</p>","PeriodicalId":72651,"journal":{"name":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)","volume":"45 Suppl 1","pages":"10-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized, Parallel Design Study to Compare the Effects of Two Different Interdental Cleaning Modalities on Gingivitis and Plaque After a 4-Week Period of Home Use.\",\"authors\":\"JingRu Li, Farah Mirza, Melissa Nelson, Jessica Foster, Pejmon Amini, Umar Imtiaz, Marilyn Ward\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study objective was to evaluate the effect of two different interdental oral cleaning modalities on gingivitis and plaque following a 4-week period of home use. This was a randomized, parallel, single-blinded study. Subjects were routine manual toothbrush (MTB) users with moderate to severe gingivitis, aged 18 to 65 years. Subjects were required at baseline to have a gingival bleeding score of ≥1 on at least 50 gingival sites per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and to have an overall plaque score of ≥0.6 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) following a 3- to 6-hour plaque accumulation period. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the oral care cleaning modalities: (1) NON group: MTB alone, (2) IDB group: MTB plus an interdental brush, or (3) MPF group: MTB plus a Philips® Sonicare® Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle. All subjects used the MTB with fluoride toothpaste. Efficacy measures (Modified Gingival Index [MGI], GBI, and RMNPI) and safety were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 4 as measured by the MGI. A total of 189 subjects were randomized and 186 completed the study. The adjusted mean percent reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 4 was 2.80% for the NON group, 11.32% for the IDB group, and 20.87% for the MPF group. The differences between the MPF group and the NON and IDB groups were statistically significant (.0001). In conclusion, use of the MTB with the Philips Sonicare Power Flosser showed statistically significant benefits compared to an MTB alone and an MTB used with an interdental brush in reducing gingival inflammation following 4 weeks of home use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)\",\"volume\":\"45 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"10-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的是评估两种不同的牙间口腔清洁方式在家庭使用 4 周后对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。这是一项随机、平行、单盲研究。研究对象为患有中度至重度牙龈炎的常规手动牙刷(MTB)使用者,年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间。根据牙龈出血指数(GBI),受试者在基线时至少有 50 个牙龈部位的牙龈出血评分≥1 分;根据 Rustogi 改良海军牙菌斑指数(RMNPI),受试者在牙菌斑累积 3 到 6 小时后的总体牙菌斑评分≥0.6 分。根据口腔护理清洁模式,受试者被随机分配到三组中的一组:(1)NON 组:(2) IDB 组:(3) MPF 组:MTB组:MTB加带Quad Stream喷嘴的飞利浦® Sonicare® 强力冲牙器。所有受试者都使用含氟牙膏的 MTB。疗效指标(改良牙龈指数 [MGI]、GBI 和 RMNPI)和安全性分别在基线、2 周和 4 周时进行评估。主要疗效终点是通过 MGI 测定从基线到第 4 周牙龈炎症的减轻程度。共有 189 名受试者被随机选中,其中 186 人完成了研究。从基线到第 4 周,NON 组牙龈炎症的调整后平均减少百分比为 2.80%,IDB 组为 11.32%,MPF 组为 20.87%。MPF 组与 NON 组和 IDB 组之间的差异具有显著的统计学意义(0.0001)。总之,与单独使用 MTB 和与牙间刷一起使用 MTB 相比,与飞利浦 Sonicare Power 冲牙器一起使用 MTB 在家庭使用 4 周后,在减少牙龈炎症方面具有显著的统计学优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized, Parallel Design Study to Compare the Effects of Two Different Interdental Cleaning Modalities on Gingivitis and Plaque After a 4-Week Period of Home Use.

The study objective was to evaluate the effect of two different interdental oral cleaning modalities on gingivitis and plaque following a 4-week period of home use. This was a randomized, parallel, single-blinded study. Subjects were routine manual toothbrush (MTB) users with moderate to severe gingivitis, aged 18 to 65 years. Subjects were required at baseline to have a gingival bleeding score of ≥1 on at least 50 gingival sites per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and to have an overall plaque score of ≥0.6 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) following a 3- to 6-hour plaque accumulation period. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the oral care cleaning modalities: (1) NON group: MTB alone, (2) IDB group: MTB plus an interdental brush, or (3) MPF group: MTB plus a Philips® Sonicare® Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle. All subjects used the MTB with fluoride toothpaste. Efficacy measures (Modified Gingival Index [MGI], GBI, and RMNPI) and safety were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 4 as measured by the MGI. A total of 189 subjects were randomized and 186 completed the study. The adjusted mean percent reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 4 was 2.80% for the NON group, 11.32% for the IDB group, and 20.87% for the MPF group. The differences between the MPF group and the NON and IDB groups were statistically significant (.0001). In conclusion, use of the MTB with the Philips Sonicare Power Flosser showed statistically significant benefits compared to an MTB alone and an MTB used with an interdental brush in reducing gingival inflammation following 4 weeks of home use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信