成人心脏手术中的新型吸入式肺血管扩张剂:范围界定综述。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Navindra David, Sameer Lakha, Samantha Walsh, Eric Fried, Samuel DeMaria
{"title":"成人心脏手术中的新型吸入式肺血管扩张剂:范围界定综述。","authors":"Navindra David, Sameer Lakha, Samantha Walsh, Eric Fried, Samuel DeMaria","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02770-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common cause of postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery that is commonly treated with conventional inhaled therapies, specifically nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Alternative therapies include inhaled milrinone and levosimendan, which are receiving more research interest and are increasing in clinical use as they may cut costs while allowing for easier administration. We sought to conduct a scoping review to appraise the evidence base for the use of these two novel inhaled vasodilators as an intervention for PH in cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Source: </strong>We searched Embase and MEDLINE for relevant articles from 1947 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>We identified 17 studies including 969 patients. The included studies show that inhaled milrinone and levosimendan are selective pulmonary vasodilators with potential benefits ranging from ease of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass to reduction in ventricular dysfunction. Nevertheless, high-quality data are limited, and study design and comparators are extremely heterogeneous, limiting the potential validity and generalizability of findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this scoping review suggest that milrinone and levosimendan may be effective alternatives to current inhaled therapies for cardiac dysfunction in the setting of PH. Nevertheless, randomized trials have focused on specific agents and consistent outcome measures are needed to better validate the early-stage promise of these agents.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ ); first posted 21 July 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"1154-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Navindra David, Sameer Lakha, Samantha Walsh, Eric Fried, Samuel DeMaria\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-024-02770-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common cause of postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery that is commonly treated with conventional inhaled therapies, specifically nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Alternative therapies include inhaled milrinone and levosimendan, which are receiving more research interest and are increasing in clinical use as they may cut costs while allowing for easier administration. We sought to conduct a scoping review to appraise the evidence base for the use of these two novel inhaled vasodilators as an intervention for PH in cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Source: </strong>We searched Embase and MEDLINE for relevant articles from 1947 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>We identified 17 studies including 969 patients. The included studies show that inhaled milrinone and levosimendan are selective pulmonary vasodilators with potential benefits ranging from ease of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass to reduction in ventricular dysfunction. Nevertheless, high-quality data are limited, and study design and comparators are extremely heterogeneous, limiting the potential validity and generalizability of findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this scoping review suggest that milrinone and levosimendan may be effective alternatives to current inhaled therapies for cardiac dysfunction in the setting of PH. Nevertheless, randomized trials have focused on specific agents and consistent outcome measures are needed to better validate the early-stage promise of these agents.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ ); first posted 21 July 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1154-1162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02770-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02770-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺动脉高压(PH)是导致心脏手术术后死亡的常见原因,通常采用传统的吸入疗法进行治疗,特别是一氧化氮和前列环素。替代疗法包括吸入米力农和左西孟旦,这两种疗法受到越来越多的研究关注,临床应用也在不断增加,因为它们既能降低成本,又能方便给药。我们试图进行一次范围界定综述,评估使用这两种新型吸入式血管扩张剂干预心脏手术 PH 的证据基础:我们检索了 Embase 和 MEDLINE 中 1947 年至 2022 年的相关文章:我们确定了 17 项研究,包括 969 名患者。纳入的研究表明,吸入米力农和左西孟旦是选择性肺血管扩张剂,具有从心肺旁路断流到减少心室功能障碍的潜在益处。然而,高质量的数据十分有限,研究设计和比较对象也极不一致,这限制了研究结果的潜在有效性和可推广性:本范围综述的研究结果表明,米力农和左西孟旦可能是目前吸入疗法的有效替代品,可用于治疗 PH 情况下的心功能不全。然而,随机试验主要针对特定药物,需要采用一致的结果测量方法来更好地验证这些药物的早期前景:研究注册:开放科学框架 ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ );2022 年 7 月 21 日首次发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Novel inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery: a scoping review.

Novel inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery: a scoping review.

Purpose: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common cause of postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery that is commonly treated with conventional inhaled therapies, specifically nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Alternative therapies include inhaled milrinone and levosimendan, which are receiving more research interest and are increasing in clinical use as they may cut costs while allowing for easier administration. We sought to conduct a scoping review to appraise the evidence base for the use of these two novel inhaled vasodilators as an intervention for PH in cardiac surgery.

Source: We searched Embase and MEDLINE for relevant articles from 1947 to 2022.

Principal findings: We identified 17 studies including 969 patients. The included studies show that inhaled milrinone and levosimendan are selective pulmonary vasodilators with potential benefits ranging from ease of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass to reduction in ventricular dysfunction. Nevertheless, high-quality data are limited, and study design and comparators are extremely heterogeneous, limiting the potential validity and generalizability of findings.

Conclusion: The findings of this scoping review suggest that milrinone and levosimendan may be effective alternatives to current inhaled therapies for cardiac dysfunction in the setting of PH. Nevertheless, randomized trials have focused on specific agents and consistent outcome measures are needed to better validate the early-stage promise of these agents.

Study registration: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ ); first posted 21 July 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信