垃圾车最后一英里路线的双目标优化:美学与公众接触。

IF 3.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Waste Management & Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1177/0734242X241252914
Aathira K Das, Bhargava Rama Chilukuri
{"title":"垃圾车最后一英里路线的双目标优化:美学与公众接触。","authors":"Aathira K Das, Bhargava Rama Chilukuri","doi":"10.1177/0734242X241252914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the area of Solid Waste Management, transportation of the collected waste is a critical aspect considering the substantial time spent by garbage trucks on public roads. Studies have reported that transporting garbage has challenges related to public exposure and aesthetics. This study presents a generalised bi-objective formulation for the optimal routing of garbage trucks from transfer stations to recycling sites/landfills considering the trade-off between public exposure and aesthetic loss and constraining the operating cost. The formulation uses the novel link capacity function to account for the delay at traffic signals and the mix of trucks and cars on link performance. The proposed formulation is solved using the weighted sum and ε-constraint methods and applied to a realistic case study of the City of Chicago, USA. The Pareto Front obtained for the bi-objective formulation offers diverse trade-off solutions catering to distinct performance metrics. The results highlight the disparity across the solutions; the solution (P0.95 on Pareto Front) for minimum operating cost (or travel time or distance travelled) is very different from the solution (P0.4 on Pareto Front) for aesthetic cost and public exposure. The parametric study indicated that a modest operating budget may suffice for achieving aesthetic benefits, but minimising public exposure requires a higher operating budget. Finally, the proposed framework is adaptable to address various challenges pertaining to waste transportation, thereby serving as a valuable tool for evaluating policies and practices geared towards sustainability objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":23671,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management & Research","volume":" ","pages":"369-377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bi-objective optimization for last-mile routing of garbage trucks: Aesthetics and Public exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Aathira K Das, Bhargava Rama Chilukuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0734242X241252914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the area of Solid Waste Management, transportation of the collected waste is a critical aspect considering the substantial time spent by garbage trucks on public roads. Studies have reported that transporting garbage has challenges related to public exposure and aesthetics. This study presents a generalised bi-objective formulation for the optimal routing of garbage trucks from transfer stations to recycling sites/landfills considering the trade-off between public exposure and aesthetic loss and constraining the operating cost. The formulation uses the novel link capacity function to account for the delay at traffic signals and the mix of trucks and cars on link performance. The proposed formulation is solved using the weighted sum and ε-constraint methods and applied to a realistic case study of the City of Chicago, USA. The Pareto Front obtained for the bi-objective formulation offers diverse trade-off solutions catering to distinct performance metrics. The results highlight the disparity across the solutions; the solution (P0.95 on Pareto Front) for minimum operating cost (or travel time or distance travelled) is very different from the solution (P0.4 on Pareto Front) for aesthetic cost and public exposure. The parametric study indicated that a modest operating budget may suffice for achieving aesthetic benefits, but minimising public exposure requires a higher operating budget. Finally, the proposed framework is adaptable to address various challenges pertaining to waste transportation, thereby serving as a valuable tool for evaluating policies and practices geared towards sustainability objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste Management & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"369-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste Management & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241252914\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management & Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241252914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在固体废物管理领域,考虑到垃圾车在公共道路上花费的大量时间,运输收集的垃圾是一个至关重要的方面。研究报告指出,垃圾运输面临着与公众接触和美观相关的挑战。本研究针对垃圾车从转运站到回收站/垃圾填埋场的最优路径问题,提出了一种通用的双目标公式,既考虑了公众暴露和美观损失之间的权衡,又限制了运营成本。该方案使用了新颖的链路容量函数,以考虑交通信号的延迟以及卡车和汽车的混合对链路性能的影响。利用加权求和法和ε约束法求解了所提出的方案,并将其应用于美国芝加哥市的实际案例研究。双目标公式的帕累托前沿为不同的性能指标提供了不同的权衡解决方案。结果凸显了各种解决方案之间的差异;最小运营成本(或旅行时间或旅行距离)的解决方案(帕累托前线上的 P0.95)与美观成本和公众曝光度的解决方案(帕累托前线上的 P0.4)截然不同。参数研究表明,适度的运营预算可能足以实现美学效益,但最大限度地减少公众曝光则需要更高的运营预算。最后,建议的框架可用于应对与废物运输有关的各种挑战,从而成为评估实现可持续发展目标的政策和做法的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bi-objective optimization for last-mile routing of garbage trucks: Aesthetics and Public exposure.

In the area of Solid Waste Management, transportation of the collected waste is a critical aspect considering the substantial time spent by garbage trucks on public roads. Studies have reported that transporting garbage has challenges related to public exposure and aesthetics. This study presents a generalised bi-objective formulation for the optimal routing of garbage trucks from transfer stations to recycling sites/landfills considering the trade-off between public exposure and aesthetic loss and constraining the operating cost. The formulation uses the novel link capacity function to account for the delay at traffic signals and the mix of trucks and cars on link performance. The proposed formulation is solved using the weighted sum and ε-constraint methods and applied to a realistic case study of the City of Chicago, USA. The Pareto Front obtained for the bi-objective formulation offers diverse trade-off solutions catering to distinct performance metrics. The results highlight the disparity across the solutions; the solution (P0.95 on Pareto Front) for minimum operating cost (or travel time or distance travelled) is very different from the solution (P0.4 on Pareto Front) for aesthetic cost and public exposure. The parametric study indicated that a modest operating budget may suffice for achieving aesthetic benefits, but minimising public exposure requires a higher operating budget. Finally, the proposed framework is adaptable to address various challenges pertaining to waste transportation, thereby serving as a valuable tool for evaluating policies and practices geared towards sustainability objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Waste Management & Research
Waste Management & Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
232
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Waste Management & Research (WM&R) publishes peer-reviewed articles relating to both the theory and practice of waste management and research. Published on behalf of the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) topics include: wastes (focus on solids), processes and technologies, management systems and tools, and policy and regulatory frameworks, sustainable waste management designs, operations, policies or practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信