护理和性别与 COVID-19 疫苗接种抗体反应之间的相互作用。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Psychosomatic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000001322
Stephen Gallagher, Ruth Ryan, Irene Cassidy, Wenyi Tang, Anna C Whittaker
{"title":"护理和性别与 COVID-19 疫苗接种抗体反应之间的相互作用。","authors":"Stephen Gallagher, Ruth Ryan, Irene Cassidy, Wenyi Tang, Anna C Whittaker","doi":"10.1097/PSY.0000000000001322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antibody response to vaccination is a powerful paradigm for studying the effects of chronic stress on immune function. In the present study, we used this paradigm to examine the interaction between caregiving (as a type of chronic stress) and sex on the antibody response to a single dose of a COVID-19 vaccination; recent research has called for examination of sex differences on health outcomes among family caregivers. A three-way interaction between caregiving, sex, and psychological distress was also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>COVID-19 antibody data were extracted from 165 caregivers (98 females) and 386 non-caregivers (244 females) from the UK's Understanding Society COVID-19 study. Relevant sociodemographics, health and lifestyle, and distress variables were gathered as potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a 2 × 2 ANOVA, we found that the interaction between caregiving and sex was significant; male caregivers had a lower antibody response to the vaccine compared to female caregivers ( F (1,547), =24.82, p < .001, η2p = 0.043). Following adjustment, male caregivers had the lowest antibody response relative to all other groups. The three-way interaction model, controlling for covariates, was also significant ( R2 = 0.013, p = .049); the conditional effects for the three-way interaction revealed that male caregivers, compared to the other groups, had a lower antibody response at both low and medium levels of psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found evidence of a three-way interaction between caregiving, sex, and distress on antibody response. Male caregivers had poorer antibody response to a single shot of the COVID-19 vaccination than female caregivers and male and female non-caregivers, and this was evident at low and medium levels of distress. Our findings will be discussed in relation to the caregiver and sex interactions during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20918,"journal":{"name":"Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactions Between Caregiving and Sex and the Antibody Response to COVID-19 Vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Gallagher, Ruth Ryan, Irene Cassidy, Wenyi Tang, Anna C Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PSY.0000000000001322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antibody response to vaccination is a powerful paradigm for studying the effects of chronic stress on immune function. In the present study, we used this paradigm to examine the interaction between caregiving (as a type of chronic stress) and sex on the antibody response to a single dose of a COVID-19 vaccination; recent research has called for examination of sex differences on health outcomes among family caregivers. A three-way interaction between caregiving, sex, and psychological distress was also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>COVID-19 antibody data were extracted from 165 caregivers (98 females) and 386 non-caregivers (244 females) from the UK's Understanding Society COVID-19 study. Relevant sociodemographics, health and lifestyle, and distress variables were gathered as potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a 2 × 2 ANOVA, we found that the interaction between caregiving and sex was significant; male caregivers had a lower antibody response to the vaccine compared to female caregivers ( F (1,547), =24.82, p < .001, η2p = 0.043). Following adjustment, male caregivers had the lowest antibody response relative to all other groups. The three-way interaction model, controlling for covariates, was also significant ( R2 = 0.013, p = .049); the conditional effects for the three-way interaction revealed that male caregivers, compared to the other groups, had a lower antibody response at both low and medium levels of psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found evidence of a three-way interaction between caregiving, sex, and distress on antibody response. Male caregivers had poorer antibody response to a single shot of the COVID-19 vaccination than female caregivers and male and female non-caregivers, and this was evident at low and medium levels of distress. Our findings will be discussed in relation to the caregiver and sex interactions during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychosomatic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychosomatic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000001322\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosomatic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000001322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:接种疫苗后的抗体反应是研究慢性压力对免疫功能影响的一个有力范例。在本研究中,我们利用这一范例研究了护理(慢性压力的一种)和性别对单剂 COVID-19 疫苗接种的抗体反应的交互作用;最近的研究呼吁研究性别差异对家庭护理人员健康结果的影响。此外,还研究了护理、性别和心理压力三者之间的交互作用:从英国 "理解社会 COVID-19 研究 "的 165 名照顾者(98 名女性)和 386 名非照顾者(244 名女性)中提取了 COVID-19 抗体数据。收集了相关的社会人口统计学、健康和生活方式以及痛苦变量作为潜在的协变量:在 2 x 2 方差分析中,我们发现护理与性别之间的交互作用非常显著;与女性护理人员相比,男性护理人员对疫苗的抗体反应较低,F (1,547), =24.82, p < .001, η2 = .043。经调整后,男性护理人员的抗体反应低于所有其他组别。控制协变量的三方交互作用模型也很显著,R2 = .013,p = .049;三方交互作用的条件效应显示,与其他组别相比,男性照顾者在低度和中度心理困扰时的抗体反应都较低:本研究发现,照顾者、性别和心理压力对抗体反应的影响存在三方交互作用。与女性护理人员、男性和女性非护理人员相比,男性护理人员接种一针 COVID-19 疫苗后的抗体反应较差,这在低度和中度心理压力时都很明显。我们将结合大流行期间护理人员与性别之间的相互作用来讨论我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interactions Between Caregiving and Sex and the Antibody Response to COVID-19 Vaccination.

Objective: Antibody response to vaccination is a powerful paradigm for studying the effects of chronic stress on immune function. In the present study, we used this paradigm to examine the interaction between caregiving (as a type of chronic stress) and sex on the antibody response to a single dose of a COVID-19 vaccination; recent research has called for examination of sex differences on health outcomes among family caregivers. A three-way interaction between caregiving, sex, and psychological distress was also examined.

Methods: COVID-19 antibody data were extracted from 165 caregivers (98 females) and 386 non-caregivers (244 females) from the UK's Understanding Society COVID-19 study. Relevant sociodemographics, health and lifestyle, and distress variables were gathered as potential covariates.

Results: In a 2 × 2 ANOVA, we found that the interaction between caregiving and sex was significant; male caregivers had a lower antibody response to the vaccine compared to female caregivers ( F (1,547), =24.82, p < .001, η2p = 0.043). Following adjustment, male caregivers had the lowest antibody response relative to all other groups. The three-way interaction model, controlling for covariates, was also significant ( R2 = 0.013, p = .049); the conditional effects for the three-way interaction revealed that male caregivers, compared to the other groups, had a lower antibody response at both low and medium levels of psychological distress.

Conclusion: This study found evidence of a three-way interaction between caregiving, sex, and distress on antibody response. Male caregivers had poorer antibody response to a single shot of the COVID-19 vaccination than female caregivers and male and female non-caregivers, and this was evident at low and medium levels of distress. Our findings will be discussed in relation to the caregiver and sex interactions during the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychosomatic Medicine
Psychosomatic Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychosomatic Medicine is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Psychosomatic Society. The journal publishes experimental, clinical, and epidemiological studies on the role of psychological and social factors in the biological and behavioral processes relevant to health and disease. Psychosomatic Medicine is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal devoted to high-quality science on biobehavioral mechanisms, brain-behavior interactions relevant to physical and mental disorders, as well as interventions in clinical and public health settings. Psychosomatic Medicine was founded in 1939 and publishes interdisciplinary research articles relevant to medicine, psychiatry, psychology, and other health-related disciplines. The print journal is published nine times a year; most articles are published online ahead of print. Supplementary issues may contain reports of conferences at which original research was presented in areas relevant to the psychosomatic and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信