在 COVID-19 大流行期间,计划生育计划的复原力如何? 来自 70 个国家的证据。

Gates Open Research Pub Date : 2024-03-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.14856.2
Karen Hardee, Rebecca Rosenberg, John Ross, Imelda Zosa-Feranil
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,计划生育计划的复原力如何? 来自 70 个国家的证据。","authors":"Karen Hardee, Rebecca Rosenberg, John Ross, Imelda Zosa-Feranil","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.14856.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic fears of severe disruptions to family planning (FP) and access to services abounded. This paper uses a unique data source, a special Supplement added to the 2021 round of the National Composite Index for Family Planning (NCIFP), to assess in depth the resilience of FP programs in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic across 70 countries spanning six regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2021 NCIFP included 961 key informants who were asked questions to assess interference in the countries' ability to achieve objectives, ability to maintain commitment to FP, and availability of information and services. Open ended responses added context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All programs were affected; the magnitude of effects varies by region and country. While the average resilience score, at 47 out of 100, implies middling levels of resilience, further analysis showed that despite interference in many components of programming, with some exceptions, the COVID-19 pandemic generally did not diminish government commitment to FP and programs remained resilient in providing access to services. Common themes mentioned by 178 respondents (18.5% of respondents) included: fear of infection; disruption of services / difficulty with lockdown and travel restrictions; staff / facilities diverted to COVID-19; access to reproductive health services and contraceptive methods affected; shifts in services / outreach; interference with logistics & supplies, training & supervision, and M&E; lack of attention to FP/sexual reproductive health; financing reduced or diverted; and effects on existing partnerships. A strong enabling environment for FP, which the NCIFP is designed to measure, was positively correlated with continued government commitment and access to contraceptive methods during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are instructive for programming: it will face challenges and 'interference' when unanticipated shocks like COVID-19 occur, with strong FP programs best prepared to exhibit resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"7 ","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How resilient were family planning programs during the COVID-19 pandemic?  Evidence from 70 countries.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Hardee, Rebecca Rosenberg, John Ross, Imelda Zosa-Feranil\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/gatesopenres.14856.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic fears of severe disruptions to family planning (FP) and access to services abounded. This paper uses a unique data source, a special Supplement added to the 2021 round of the National Composite Index for Family Planning (NCIFP), to assess in depth the resilience of FP programs in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic across 70 countries spanning six regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2021 NCIFP included 961 key informants who were asked questions to assess interference in the countries' ability to achieve objectives, ability to maintain commitment to FP, and availability of information and services. Open ended responses added context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All programs were affected; the magnitude of effects varies by region and country. While the average resilience score, at 47 out of 100, implies middling levels of resilience, further analysis showed that despite interference in many components of programming, with some exceptions, the COVID-19 pandemic generally did not diminish government commitment to FP and programs remained resilient in providing access to services. Common themes mentioned by 178 respondents (18.5% of respondents) included: fear of infection; disruption of services / difficulty with lockdown and travel restrictions; staff / facilities diverted to COVID-19; access to reproductive health services and contraceptive methods affected; shifts in services / outreach; interference with logistics & supplies, training & supervision, and M&E; lack of attention to FP/sexual reproductive health; financing reduced or diverted; and effects on existing partnerships. A strong enabling environment for FP, which the NCIFP is designed to measure, was positively correlated with continued government commitment and access to contraceptive methods during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are instructive for programming: it will face challenges and 'interference' when unanticipated shocks like COVID-19 occur, with strong FP programs best prepared to exhibit resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.14856.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.14856.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID-19大流行之初,人们普遍担心计划生育(FP)和服务的获取会受到严重干扰。本文使用了一个独特的数据源--2021年国家计划生育综合指数(NCIFP)中添加的特别补编--来深入评估横跨六个地区的70个国家的FP项目在COVID-19大流行时的恢复力:方法:2021年全国计划生育信息通报计划包括961名关键信息提供者,向他们提出问题,以评估各国实现目标的能力、保持对计划生育承诺的能力以及信息和服务的可用性等方面受到的干扰。开放式回答增加了背景信息:结果:所有计划都受到了影响;影响程度因地区和国家而异。虽然平均复原力得分(满分 100 分)为 47 分,意味着复原力处于中等水平,但进一步的分析表明,尽管 COVID-19 大流行对计划编制的许多部分造成了干扰,但除个别情况外,总体上并未削弱政府对计划生育的承诺,而且各计划在提供服务方面仍然保持了复原力。178 个受访者(占受访者的 18.5%)提到的共同主题包括:对感染的恐惧;服务中断/封锁和旅行限制带来的困难;工作人员/设施被转用于 COVID-19;生殖健康服务和避孕方法的获取受到影响;服务/外联的转变;对后勤和供应、培训和监督以及 M&E 的干扰;对计划生育/性生殖健康缺乏关注;资金减少或被转用;以及对现有伙伴关系的影响。在 COVID-19 期间,一个强有力的有利于计划生育的环境(NCIFP 旨在衡量这一环境)与政府的持续承诺和避孕方法的可及性呈正相关:这些研究结果对计划编制工作具有启发意义:当发生类似COVID-19这样的意外冲击时,计划编制工作将面临挑战和 "干扰",而强大的FP计划最能展现其复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How resilient were family planning programs during the COVID-19 pandemic?  Evidence from 70 countries.

Background: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic fears of severe disruptions to family planning (FP) and access to services abounded. This paper uses a unique data source, a special Supplement added to the 2021 round of the National Composite Index for Family Planning (NCIFP), to assess in depth the resilience of FP programs in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic across 70 countries spanning six regions.

Methods: The 2021 NCIFP included 961 key informants who were asked questions to assess interference in the countries' ability to achieve objectives, ability to maintain commitment to FP, and availability of information and services. Open ended responses added context.

Results: All programs were affected; the magnitude of effects varies by region and country. While the average resilience score, at 47 out of 100, implies middling levels of resilience, further analysis showed that despite interference in many components of programming, with some exceptions, the COVID-19 pandemic generally did not diminish government commitment to FP and programs remained resilient in providing access to services. Common themes mentioned by 178 respondents (18.5% of respondents) included: fear of infection; disruption of services / difficulty with lockdown and travel restrictions; staff / facilities diverted to COVID-19; access to reproductive health services and contraceptive methods affected; shifts in services / outreach; interference with logistics & supplies, training & supervision, and M&E; lack of attention to FP/sexual reproductive health; financing reduced or diverted; and effects on existing partnerships. A strong enabling environment for FP, which the NCIFP is designed to measure, was positively correlated with continued government commitment and access to contraceptive methods during COVID-19.

Conclusion: These findings are instructive for programming: it will face challenges and 'interference' when unanticipated shocks like COVID-19 occur, with strong FP programs best prepared to exhibit resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信