埃塞俄比亚部分五家主要医院的计算机断层扫描剂量水平。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gebremedhin Kide Kinfe, Birhanu Tsegaye Wores
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚部分五家主要医院的计算机断层扫描剂量水平。","authors":"Gebremedhin Kide Kinfe, Birhanu Tsegaye Wores","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v33i6.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>X-ray Computed Tomography dose levels have been varying among modalities and scanning body regions due to the absence of incessant routine follow-up. Thus, the study aimed to compute the dose index discrepancies in Ethiopia for the most recurring scan protocols (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sampling method was employed to select the hospitals due to the rare existence of functional CT scanners in Ethiopia. From the selected hospitals, a total of 1,385 (249 heads, 804 chests, 132 abdomens, and 200 pelvis) were collected in terms of standard dose metric values in the period of December 2019-March 2020. Patients' DLP was computed into mean value using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. From the mean DLP, we can compute the effective dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' dose level disparity was observed in this study though it is below the ICRP standard level for all body regions except for pelvis DLP (593.37 mGy-cm) at Black Lion. The dose level for the head and chest are computed within the recommended level at all hospitals. Effective doses for the pelvis at four hospitals (Teklehaimanot, Black Lion, ALERT, Paul's, and Ayder hospitals) were computed as 6.45, 8.90, 5.08, 6.54, and 6.84 mSv respectively, and the effective doses for abdomen at Ayder Hospital was obtained to be 8.90 mSv, which is above the recommended value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>X-ray CT scanners are somewhat properly functioning although some sort of justification and optimization for pelvis and abdomen examinations are strongly recommended to implement as low as reasonably achievable principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"33 6","pages":"1005-1014"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed Tomography Dose Level in Selected Five Principal Hospitals in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Gebremedhin Kide Kinfe, Birhanu Tsegaye Wores\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ejhs.v33i6.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>X-ray Computed Tomography dose levels have been varying among modalities and scanning body regions due to the absence of incessant routine follow-up. Thus, the study aimed to compute the dose index discrepancies in Ethiopia for the most recurring scan protocols (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sampling method was employed to select the hospitals due to the rare existence of functional CT scanners in Ethiopia. From the selected hospitals, a total of 1,385 (249 heads, 804 chests, 132 abdomens, and 200 pelvis) were collected in terms of standard dose metric values in the period of December 2019-March 2020. Patients' DLP was computed into mean value using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. From the mean DLP, we can compute the effective dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' dose level disparity was observed in this study though it is below the ICRP standard level for all body regions except for pelvis DLP (593.37 mGy-cm) at Black Lion. The dose level for the head and chest are computed within the recommended level at all hospitals. Effective doses for the pelvis at four hospitals (Teklehaimanot, Black Lion, ALERT, Paul's, and Ayder hospitals) were computed as 6.45, 8.90, 5.08, 6.54, and 6.84 mSv respectively, and the effective doses for abdomen at Ayder Hospital was obtained to be 8.90 mSv, which is above the recommended value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>X-ray CT scanners are somewhat properly functioning although some sort of justification and optimization for pelvis and abdomen examinations are strongly recommended to implement as low as reasonably achievable principle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"1005-1014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111265/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i6.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i6.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于缺乏持续的常规跟踪,X 射线计算机断层扫描的剂量水平因扫描方式和扫描部位而异。因此,本研究旨在计算埃塞俄比亚最常用的扫描方案(头部、胸部、腹部和骨盆)的剂量指数差异:由于埃塞俄比亚很少有功能性 CT 扫描仪,因此采用了目的性抽样方法来选择医院。在2019年12月至2020年3月期间,从所选医院共收集了1,385例(249例头部、804例胸部、132例腹部和200例骨盆)的标准剂量指标值。使用 IBM SPSS Statistics 20 软件将患者的 DLP 计算为平均值。根据 DLP 平均值,我们可以计算出有效剂量:本研究观察到患者的剂量水平存在差异,但除了黑狮医院骨盆的 DLP(593.37 mGy-cm)外,其他身体部位的剂量水平均低于国际放射防护委员会的标准水平。所有医院计算的头部和胸部剂量水平都在建议水平之内。四家医院(Teklehaimanot、Black Lion、ALERT、Paul's 和 Ayder 医院)骨盆的有效剂量分别为 6.45、8.90、5.08、6.54 和 6.84 mSv,Ayder 医院腹部的有效剂量为 8.90 mSv,高于建议值:结论:X 射线 CT 扫描仪在一定程度上运行正常,但强烈建议对骨盆和腹部检查进行一定的论证和优化,以执行尽可能低的合理剂量原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computed Tomography Dose Level in Selected Five Principal Hospitals in Ethiopia.

Background: X-ray Computed Tomography dose levels have been varying among modalities and scanning body regions due to the absence of incessant routine follow-up. Thus, the study aimed to compute the dose index discrepancies in Ethiopia for the most recurring scan protocols (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis).

Methods: A purposive sampling method was employed to select the hospitals due to the rare existence of functional CT scanners in Ethiopia. From the selected hospitals, a total of 1,385 (249 heads, 804 chests, 132 abdomens, and 200 pelvis) were collected in terms of standard dose metric values in the period of December 2019-March 2020. Patients' DLP was computed into mean value using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. From the mean DLP, we can compute the effective dose.

Results: Patients' dose level disparity was observed in this study though it is below the ICRP standard level for all body regions except for pelvis DLP (593.37 mGy-cm) at Black Lion. The dose level for the head and chest are computed within the recommended level at all hospitals. Effective doses for the pelvis at four hospitals (Teklehaimanot, Black Lion, ALERT, Paul's, and Ayder hospitals) were computed as 6.45, 8.90, 5.08, 6.54, and 6.84 mSv respectively, and the effective doses for abdomen at Ayder Hospital was obtained to be 8.90 mSv, which is above the recommended value.

Conclusion: X-ray CT scanners are somewhat properly functioning although some sort of justification and optimization for pelvis and abdomen examinations are strongly recommended to implement as low as reasonably achievable principle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信