"阿奇霉素 "脚跟不再?在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)不常见突变(G719X、S768I 和 L861Q)患者中,每日一次服用 40 毫克阿法替尼优于铂类化疗(ACHILLES/TORG1834)。

IF 5.1 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-05-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LCTT.S461758
Faustine X Luo, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou
{"title":"\"阿奇霉素 \"脚跟不再?在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)不常见突变(G719X、S768I 和 L861Q)患者中,每日一次服用 40 毫克阿法替尼优于铂类化疗(ACHILLES/TORG1834)。","authors":"Faustine X Luo, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S461758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three \"uncommon\" <i>EGFR</i> mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for \"uncommon\" <i>EGFR</i> mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these \"uncommon\" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon <i>EGFR</i> mutations is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"ACHILLES\\\" Heel No More? Afatinib at 40 Mg Once Daily is Superior to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i> Uncommon (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) Mutations (ACHILLES/TORG1834).\",\"authors\":\"Faustine X Luo, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LCTT.S461758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three \\\"uncommon\\\" <i>EGFR</i> mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for \\\"uncommon\\\" <i>EGFR</i> mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these \\\"uncommon\\\" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon <i>EGFR</i> mutations is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S461758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S461758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据三项前瞻性试验(LUX-Lung 2、3 和 6)的汇总回顾分析,第二代共价表皮生长因子受体 TKI 阿法替尼被批准用于治疗三种 "不常见 "表皮生长因子受体突变(G719X、S768I 和 L861Q)。经独立放射学审查评估,确认的总体应答率为 66%(95% 置信区间:47-81)。在21名应答者中,应答持续时间≥12个月的患者比例为52%,应答持续时间≥18个月的患者比例为33%。值得注意的是,所有患者接受的阿法替尼剂量均为40或50毫克,每天一次,高于批准的40毫克每天一次的剂量,也高于大多数胸部肿瘤专家通常采用的30毫克每天一次的起始剂量。鉴于阿法替尼被批准用于治疗 "不常见 "的表皮生长因子受体突变是基于有限的患者数量、分析的回顾性以及缺乏随机 2 期或 3 期试验,阿法替尼、化疗或其他新一代表皮生长因子受体 TKIs 是否是最佳治疗方法仍存在不确定性。这种不确定性也阻碍了未来治疗这些 "不常见 "突变的发展,因为不确定阿法替尼是否是最佳治疗方法,因此在未来的随机试验中,阿法替尼应作为标准治疗对照臂。最后,ACHILLES/TORG1834 为我们提供了首个随机试验结果,即阿法替尼的无进展生存期优于铂类化疗(10.6 个月 vs 5.7 个月,HR = 0.42;95% CI:0.256-0.694;P = 0.0007)。不过,鉴于入组患者人数有限(109 人),ACHILLES 主要应被视为 2 期试验。此外,PFS获益似乎是每日40毫克剂量(HR=0.128;95% CI:0.050-0.327),而不是每日30毫克剂量(HR=0.704;95% CI:0.352-1.406)。对于治疗不常见的表皮生长因子受体突变,还需要进一步研究30毫克/天的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"ACHILLES" Heel No More? Afatinib at 40 Mg Once Daily is Superior to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in EGFR Uncommon (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) Mutations (ACHILLES/TORG1834).

Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three "uncommon" EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for "uncommon" EGFR mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these "uncommon" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信