{"title":"危急情况国际法下的网络行动和自动黑客反击","authors":"Samuli Haataja","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the use of automatic hack backs under international law on necessity. Hack backs are a form of active defence measure adopted in response to cybersecurity threats that involve effects outside the victim's systems or networks designed to mitigate or prevent the cybersecurity threat. Automatic hack backs are systems that, once activated, are capable of performing these functions without direct human control. The plea of necessity under international law on State responsibility provides a basis on which States can adopt measures that would otherwise be unlawful in order to respond to cyber operations that constitute a grave and imminent against their essential interests. This article argues that the use of automatic hack backs can be justified on the basis of necessity, however, the system would need to be capable of making a range of complex assessments to ensure it meets the strict criteria required by international law. The complexity of systems capable of making these assessments carries a risk unintended effects and escalation of conflict at machine speed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 105992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000591/pdfft?md5=6126e1fe75cd581a5ca4f042e65cd4e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0267364924000591-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyber operations and automatic hack backs under international law on necessity\",\"authors\":\"Samuli Haataja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article examines the use of automatic hack backs under international law on necessity. Hack backs are a form of active defence measure adopted in response to cybersecurity threats that involve effects outside the victim's systems or networks designed to mitigate or prevent the cybersecurity threat. Automatic hack backs are systems that, once activated, are capable of performing these functions without direct human control. The plea of necessity under international law on State responsibility provides a basis on which States can adopt measures that would otherwise be unlawful in order to respond to cyber operations that constitute a grave and imminent against their essential interests. This article argues that the use of automatic hack backs can be justified on the basis of necessity, however, the system would need to be capable of making a range of complex assessments to ensure it meets the strict criteria required by international law. The complexity of systems capable of making these assessments carries a risk unintended effects and escalation of conflict at machine speed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000591/pdfft?md5=6126e1fe75cd581a5ca4f042e65cd4e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0267364924000591-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cyber operations and automatic hack backs under international law on necessity
This article examines the use of automatic hack backs under international law on necessity. Hack backs are a form of active defence measure adopted in response to cybersecurity threats that involve effects outside the victim's systems or networks designed to mitigate or prevent the cybersecurity threat. Automatic hack backs are systems that, once activated, are capable of performing these functions without direct human control. The plea of necessity under international law on State responsibility provides a basis on which States can adopt measures that would otherwise be unlawful in order to respond to cyber operations that constitute a grave and imminent against their essential interests. This article argues that the use of automatic hack backs can be justified on the basis of necessity, however, the system would need to be capable of making a range of complex assessments to ensure it meets the strict criteria required by international law. The complexity of systems capable of making these assessments carries a risk unintended effects and escalation of conflict at machine speed.
期刊介绍:
CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.