呼吸道酸中毒和氧气供应能力不会影响虹鳟鱼(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的急性温度耐受性。

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Conservation Physiology Pub Date : 2024-05-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/conphys/coae026
Daniel W Montgomery, Jennifer Finlay, Stephen D Simpson, Georg H Engelhard, Silvana N R Birchenough, Rod W Wilson
{"title":"呼吸道酸中毒和氧气供应能力不会影响虹鳟鱼(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的急性温度耐受性。","authors":"Daniel W Montgomery, Jennifer Finlay, Stephen D Simpson, Georg H Engelhard, Silvana N R Birchenough, Rod W Wilson","doi":"10.1093/conphys/coae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms that determine the temperature tolerances of fish are poorly understood, creating barriers to disentangle how additional environmental challenges-such as CO<sub>2</sub>-induced aquatic acidification and fluctuating oxygen availability-may exacerbate vulnerability to a warming climate and extreme heat events. Here, we explored whether two acute exposures (~0.5 hours or ~72 hours) to increased CO<sub>2</sub> impact acute temperature tolerance limits in a freshwater fish, rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>). We separated the potential effects of acute high CO<sub>2</sub> exposure on critical thermal maximum (CT<sub>max</sub>), caused via either respiratory acidosis (reduced internal pH) or O<sub>2</sub> supply capacity (aerobic scope), by exposing rainbow trout to ~1 kPa CO<sub>2</sub> (~1% or 10 000 μatm) in combination with normoxia or hyperoxia (~21 or 42 kPa O<sub>2</sub>, respectively). In normoxia, acute exposure to high CO<sub>2</sub> caused a large acidosis in trout (blood pH decreased by 0.43 units), while a combination of hyperoxia and ~1 kPa CO<sub>2</sub> increased the aerobic scope of trout by 28%. Despite large changes in blood pH and aerobic scope between treatments, we observed no impacts on the CT<sub>max</sub> of trout. Our results suggest that the mechanisms that determine the maximum temperature tolerance of trout are independent of blood acid-base balance or the capacity to deliver O<sub>2</sub> to tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":54331,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory acidosis and O<sub><b>2</b></sub> supply capacity do not affect the acute temperature tolerance of rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>).\",\"authors\":\"Daniel W Montgomery, Jennifer Finlay, Stephen D Simpson, Georg H Engelhard, Silvana N R Birchenough, Rod W Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/conphys/coae026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The mechanisms that determine the temperature tolerances of fish are poorly understood, creating barriers to disentangle how additional environmental challenges-such as CO<sub>2</sub>-induced aquatic acidification and fluctuating oxygen availability-may exacerbate vulnerability to a warming climate and extreme heat events. Here, we explored whether two acute exposures (~0.5 hours or ~72 hours) to increased CO<sub>2</sub> impact acute temperature tolerance limits in a freshwater fish, rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>). We separated the potential effects of acute high CO<sub>2</sub> exposure on critical thermal maximum (CT<sub>max</sub>), caused via either respiratory acidosis (reduced internal pH) or O<sub>2</sub> supply capacity (aerobic scope), by exposing rainbow trout to ~1 kPa CO<sub>2</sub> (~1% or 10 000 μatm) in combination with normoxia or hyperoxia (~21 or 42 kPa O<sub>2</sub>, respectively). In normoxia, acute exposure to high CO<sub>2</sub> caused a large acidosis in trout (blood pH decreased by 0.43 units), while a combination of hyperoxia and ~1 kPa CO<sub>2</sub> increased the aerobic scope of trout by 28%. Despite large changes in blood pH and aerobic scope between treatments, we observed no impacts on the CT<sub>max</sub> of trout. Our results suggest that the mechanisms that determine the maximum temperature tolerance of trout are independent of blood acid-base balance or the capacity to deliver O<sub>2</sub> to tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coae026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coae026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对决定鱼类温度耐受性的机理知之甚少,这就为厘清额外的环境挑战(如二氧化碳引起的水生酸化和氧气供应波动)如何加剧鱼类对气候变暖和极端高温事件的脆弱性造成了障碍。在这里,我们探讨了两次急性接触(约 0.5 小时或约 72 小时)二氧化碳增加是否会影响淡水鱼虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的急性温度耐受极限。我们将虹鳟鱼暴露在 ~1 kPa CO2(~1% 或 10 000 μatm)与常氧或高氧(分别为 ~21 或 42 kPa O2)环境中,通过呼吸性酸中毒(体内 pH 值降低)或氧气供应能力(有氧范围)来分离急性高 CO2 暴露对临界温度最大值(CTmax)的潜在影响。在常氧条件下,急性暴露于高浓度二氧化碳会导致鳟鱼严重酸中毒(血液 pH 值下降了 0.43 个单位),而结合高氧和 ~1 kPa CO2 则会使鳟鱼的有氧范围增加 28%。尽管在不同处理之间血液 pH 值和有氧范围发生了很大变化,但我们观察到鳟鱼的 CTmax 没有受到影响。我们的结果表明,决定鳟鱼最高温度耐受性的机制与血液酸碱平衡或向组织输送氧气的能力无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Respiratory acidosis and O2 supply capacity do not affect the acute temperature tolerance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

The mechanisms that determine the temperature tolerances of fish are poorly understood, creating barriers to disentangle how additional environmental challenges-such as CO2-induced aquatic acidification and fluctuating oxygen availability-may exacerbate vulnerability to a warming climate and extreme heat events. Here, we explored whether two acute exposures (~0.5 hours or ~72 hours) to increased CO2 impact acute temperature tolerance limits in a freshwater fish, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). We separated the potential effects of acute high CO2 exposure on critical thermal maximum (CTmax), caused via either respiratory acidosis (reduced internal pH) or O2 supply capacity (aerobic scope), by exposing rainbow trout to ~1 kPa CO2 (~1% or 10 000 μatm) in combination with normoxia or hyperoxia (~21 or 42 kPa O2, respectively). In normoxia, acute exposure to high CO2 caused a large acidosis in trout (blood pH decreased by 0.43 units), while a combination of hyperoxia and ~1 kPa CO2 increased the aerobic scope of trout by 28%. Despite large changes in blood pH and aerobic scope between treatments, we observed no impacts on the CTmax of trout. Our results suggest that the mechanisms that determine the maximum temperature tolerance of trout are independent of blood acid-base balance or the capacity to deliver O2 to tissues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Physiology
Conservation Physiology Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Physiology is an online only, fully open access journal published on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. Biodiversity across the globe faces a growing number of threats associated with human activities. Conservation Physiology will publish research on all taxa (microbes, plants and animals) focused on understanding and predicting how organisms, populations, ecosystems and natural resources respond to environmental change and stressors. Physiology is considered in the broadest possible terms to include functional and mechanistic responses at all scales. We also welcome research towards developing and refining strategies to rebuild populations, restore ecosystems, inform conservation policy, and manage living resources. We define conservation physiology broadly and encourage potential authors to contact the editorial team if they have any questions regarding the remit of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信