影响医疗保健与社会医疗保健之间有效共享老年人护理数据的因素:定性证据综述。

Siân de Bell, Zhivko Zhelev, Alison Bethel, Jo Thompson Coon, Rob Anderson
{"title":"影响医疗保健与社会医疗保健之间有效共享老年人护理数据的因素:定性证据综述。","authors":"Siân de Bell, Zhivko Zhelev, Alison Bethel, Jo Thompson Coon, Rob Anderson","doi":"10.3310/TTWG4738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within <i>Goals</i>, we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In <i>Relationships</i>, building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational <i>Processes and procedures</i>, such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within <i>Technology and infrastructure</i>, the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"12 12","pages":"1-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Siân de Bell, Zhivko Zhelev, Alison Bethel, Jo Thompson Coon, Rob Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/TTWG4738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within <i>Goals</i>, we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In <i>Relationships</i>, building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational <i>Processes and procedures</i>, such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within <i>Technology and infrastructure</i>, the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"1-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/TTWG4738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/TTWG4738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在医疗和社会医疗机构及专业人员之间共享病人的数据(如用药详情)对于提供协调的、以人为本的医疗服务至关重要。虽然专业人员可以通过多种方式共享数据--例如,通过共享电子记录系统或多学科团队会议--但有许多因素使得跨越医疗和社会护理边界共享数据变得困难。这些因素包括专业等级制度、无法访问电子系统以及对保密性的担忧。数据共享对老年人的护理尤为重要,因为他们更有可能患有多种或长期疾病;需要了解如何实现有效的数据共享:目的:确定影响有效数据共享的因素,包括成功采取干预措施以改善医疗保健和社会护理组织及专业人员之间有关老年人护理的数据共享:方法:检索了 MEDLINE 和其他七个数据库(截至 2023 年 3 月)中的定性和混合方法研究。对相关网站进行了搜索,并对纳入的研究进行了引文搜索。如果研究的重点是老年人(由研究定义)和数据共享(定义为医疗保健和社会护理机构或护理专业人员之间有关患者的信息传递),并且是在英国进行的,则纳入研究。通过有目的的抽样,最终获得了一组研究,并采用框架综合法对其进行了分析。采用华莱士核对表进行质量评估。在整个项目过程中,我们咨询了利益相关者、公众和患者参与团体:结果:共纳入 24 项研究;大多数研究在质量评估清单中得分很高。确定了四大主题。在 "目标 "中,我们发现了数据共享的五个目的:联合(医疗和社会护理)评估、综合病例管理、从医院到家庭的过渡、针对护理院居民的数据共享以及姑息治疗。在 "关系 "中,专业人员之间建立跨专业关系,从而建立信任和尊重,有助于数据共享,而专业偏见和不信任的存在则阻碍了数据共享。组织间的流程和程序,如共同的护理愿景和正式协议(如数据管理)的可操作性,支持数据共享。在技术和基础设施方面,技术作为一种工具的使用支持数据共享,专业人员对更广泛的护理系统的认识也支持数据共享。影响数据共享的具体因素还与其目的有关;例如,姑息关怀领域缺乏法律框架:局限性:数据共享通常是在综合医疗等更广泛的倡议背景下讨论的,这意味着所提供的信息往往是有限的。COVID-19大流行对工作方式产生了重大影响;我们所纳入的研究都不是在大流行期间或之后进行的:我们的研究结果表明,建立跨专业关系并确保专业人员能够以多种方式共享数据非常重要:需要探索 COVID-19 大流行后采用的新技术和工作方式对数据共享的影响。此外,研究还应该探讨患者的体验以及预防医疗和社会护理专业人员中的数字排斥现象:研究方案已在 PROSPERO CRD42023416621 上注册:该奖项由国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康与社会护理服务研究计划(NIHR奖项编号:NIHR135660)资助,是NIHR130538奖项下一系列证据综合的一部分,全文发表于《健康与社会护理服务研究》第12卷第12期。更多奖项信息,请参阅 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Background: Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing.

Objectives: To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people.

Methods: MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within Goals, we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In Relationships, building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational Processes and procedures, such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within Technology and infrastructure, the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care.

Limitations: Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways.

Future work: Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals.

Study registration: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信