对有写作困难的学生进行 "语音到文本 "干预以支持文本制作:北欧国家的一项单一案例研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Gunilla Almgren Bäck, Margunn Mossige, Helle Bundgaard Svendsen, Vibeke Rønneberg, Heidi Selenius, Nina Berg Gøttsche, Grete Dolmer, Linda Fälth, Staffan Nilsson, Idor Svensson
{"title":"对有写作困难的学生进行 \"语音到文本 \"干预以支持文本制作:北欧国家的一项单一案例研究。","authors":"Gunilla Almgren Bäck, Margunn Mossige, Helle Bundgaard Svendsen, Vibeke Rønneberg, Heidi Selenius, Nina Berg Gøttsche, Grete Dolmer, Linda Fälth, Staffan Nilsson, Idor Svensson","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2351488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies report that speech-to-text applications (STT) may support students with writing difficulties in text production. However, existing research is sparse, shows mixed results, and lacks information on STT interventions and their applicability in schools. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether a systematic and intensive assistive technology intervention focusing on STT can improve text production. A modified multiple-baseline across-subject design was used involving eight middle school students, four Norwegian and four Swedish. Their STT-produced narrative texts were collected during and after the intervention and the productivity, accuracy, and text quality were analysed. Keyboarding was the baseline control condition. The results demonstrated that seven of the eight students increased text productivity and that the proportion of word-level accuracy was maintained or improved. The use of punctuation progressed in participants with poor baseline skills. Most students' STT-produced texts had at least a similar ratio of meaningfulness and text quality as keyboarding. However, the magnitude of the changes and development patterns varied, with three students showing the most notable impacts. In conclusion, this study's intervention seemed beneficial in initially instructing STT, and the progress monitoring guided individually adapted future interventions such as balancing productivity and formal language aspects. Removing the spelling barrier with STT provided an opportunity for students to improve their higher-order skills, such as vocabulary diversity and overall text quality. Furthermore, visible progress, such as the ability to produce longer texts, might motivate continued STT usage. However, such development may not always be immediate.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"3110-3129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech-to-text intervention to support text production among students with writing difficulties: a single-case study in nordic countries.\",\"authors\":\"Gunilla Almgren Bäck, Margunn Mossige, Helle Bundgaard Svendsen, Vibeke Rønneberg, Heidi Selenius, Nina Berg Gøttsche, Grete Dolmer, Linda Fälth, Staffan Nilsson, Idor Svensson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2351488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies report that speech-to-text applications (STT) may support students with writing difficulties in text production. However, existing research is sparse, shows mixed results, and lacks information on STT interventions and their applicability in schools. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether a systematic and intensive assistive technology intervention focusing on STT can improve text production. A modified multiple-baseline across-subject design was used involving eight middle school students, four Norwegian and four Swedish. Their STT-produced narrative texts were collected during and after the intervention and the productivity, accuracy, and text quality were analysed. Keyboarding was the baseline control condition. The results demonstrated that seven of the eight students increased text productivity and that the proportion of word-level accuracy was maintained or improved. The use of punctuation progressed in participants with poor baseline skills. Most students' STT-produced texts had at least a similar ratio of meaningfulness and text quality as keyboarding. However, the magnitude of the changes and development patterns varied, with three students showing the most notable impacts. In conclusion, this study's intervention seemed beneficial in initially instructing STT, and the progress monitoring guided individually adapted future interventions such as balancing productivity and formal language aspects. Removing the spelling barrier with STT provided an opportunity for students to improve their higher-order skills, such as vocabulary diversity and overall text quality. Furthermore, visible progress, such as the ability to produce longer texts, might motivate continued STT usage. However, such development may not always be immediate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3110-3129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2351488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2351488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有研究报告称,语音转文字应用程序(STT)可以帮助有写作困难的学生进行文字制作。然而,现有研究很少,结果参差不齐,而且缺乏有关 STT 干预及其在学校适用性的信息。因此,本研究旨在探讨以 STT 为重点的系统性强化辅助技术干预是否能提高文本写作能力。八名中学生(四名挪威学生和四名瑞典学生)参加了这项研究。在干预过程中和干预结束后,收集了他们用 STT 制作的叙事文本,并对其效率、准确性和文本质量进行了分析。键盘输入是基线对照条件。结果表明,八名学生中有七名提高了文本效率,单词准确率保持或有所提高。基础技能较差的学员在标点符号的使用方面取得了进步。大多数学生的 STT 生成文本的意义和文本质量比例至少与键盘输入相似。然而,变化的程度和发展模式各不相同,其中三名学生的影响最为显著。总之,本研究的干预措施似乎有益于 STT 的初步指导,而对进展情况的监测则为今后的干预措施提供了个别调整的指导,如平衡工作效率和正式语言方面。通过 STT 消除拼写障碍为学生提供了一个提高高阶技能的机会,如词汇多样性和整体文本质量。此外,明显的进步,如能写出较长的文章,可能会激励学生继续使用 STT。然而,这种发展并不总是立竿见影的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speech-to-text intervention to support text production among students with writing difficulties: a single-case study in nordic countries.

Studies report that speech-to-text applications (STT) may support students with writing difficulties in text production. However, existing research is sparse, shows mixed results, and lacks information on STT interventions and their applicability in schools. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether a systematic and intensive assistive technology intervention focusing on STT can improve text production. A modified multiple-baseline across-subject design was used involving eight middle school students, four Norwegian and four Swedish. Their STT-produced narrative texts were collected during and after the intervention and the productivity, accuracy, and text quality were analysed. Keyboarding was the baseline control condition. The results demonstrated that seven of the eight students increased text productivity and that the proportion of word-level accuracy was maintained or improved. The use of punctuation progressed in participants with poor baseline skills. Most students' STT-produced texts had at least a similar ratio of meaningfulness and text quality as keyboarding. However, the magnitude of the changes and development patterns varied, with three students showing the most notable impacts. In conclusion, this study's intervention seemed beneficial in initially instructing STT, and the progress monitoring guided individually adapted future interventions such as balancing productivity and formal language aspects. Removing the spelling barrier with STT provided an opportunity for students to improve their higher-order skills, such as vocabulary diversity and overall text quality. Furthermore, visible progress, such as the ability to produce longer texts, might motivate continued STT usage. However, such development may not always be immediate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信