牛津脊柱伙伴:脊柱肉瘤服务点对点支持的可接受性和可行性项目。

Q3 Nursing
Jasmine Cammas, Sheto Tomy, Louise Strickland, Gerard Mawhinney
{"title":"牛津脊柱伙伴:脊柱肉瘤服务点对点支持的可接受性和可行性项目。","authors":"Jasmine Cammas, Sheto Tomy, Louise Strickland, Gerard Mawhinney","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.33.10.S16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the spine are rare and account for less than 0.2% of all neoplasm incidences. Following a patient and public involvement event, the need to explore patient support pathways was identified, which initiated this service evaluation project.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the acceptability and feasibility of a peer-to-peer support project among people using the spine sarcoma service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Users were paired and introduced via Microsoft Teams. Quantitative and qualitative data both pre- and post-introduction of a buddy were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Service users felt that, although they would have preferred having a buddy at the time of their diagnosis, being allocated a buddy made them feel reassured and better supported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The project was well received and preliminary data are encouraging. Therefore, due to early findings from the first participants, the service is continuing to roll out the buddy programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":35761,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxford Spine Buddies: an acceptability and feasibility project for peer-to-peer support in a spine sarcoma service.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Cammas, Sheto Tomy, Louise Strickland, Gerard Mawhinney\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2024.33.10.S16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the spine are rare and account for less than 0.2% of all neoplasm incidences. Following a patient and public involvement event, the need to explore patient support pathways was identified, which initiated this service evaluation project.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the acceptability and feasibility of a peer-to-peer support project among people using the spine sarcoma service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Users were paired and introduced via Microsoft Teams. Quantitative and qualitative data both pre- and post-introduction of a buddy were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Service users felt that, although they would have preferred having a buddy at the time of their diagnosis, being allocated a buddy made them feel reassured and better supported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The project was well received and preliminary data are encouraging. Therefore, due to early findings from the first participants, the service is continuing to roll out the buddy programme.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.33.10.S16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.33.10.S16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊柱原发性骨与软组织肉瘤非常罕见,发病率不到所有肿瘤发病率的 0.2%。目的:确定脊柱肉瘤服务使用者对点对点支持项目的接受度和可行性:方法:通过 Microsoft Teams 对用户进行配对和介绍。研究结果:服务使用者认为,虽然他们愿意接受 "同伴互助 "项目,但他们也不愿意接受 "同伴互助 "项目:研究结果:服务用户认为,尽管他们更希望在确诊时就有一名伙伴,但分配给他们一名伙伴让他们感到安心,并得到了更好的支持:结论:该项目广受欢迎,初步数据令人鼓舞。因此,鉴于首批参与者的早期发现,该服务机构将继续推出 "伙伴 "计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxford Spine Buddies: an acceptability and feasibility project for peer-to-peer support in a spine sarcoma service.

Background: Primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the spine are rare and account for less than 0.2% of all neoplasm incidences. Following a patient and public involvement event, the need to explore patient support pathways was identified, which initiated this service evaluation project.

Aim: To determine the acceptability and feasibility of a peer-to-peer support project among people using the spine sarcoma service.

Methods: Users were paired and introduced via Microsoft Teams. Quantitative and qualitative data both pre- and post-introduction of a buddy were collected.

Findings: Service users felt that, although they would have preferred having a buddy at the time of their diagnosis, being allocated a buddy made them feel reassured and better supported.

Conclusion: The project was well received and preliminary data are encouraging. Therefore, due to early findings from the first participants, the service is continuing to roll out the buddy programme.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Nursing
British Journal of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
404
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nursing (BJN) provides all nurses, regardless of specialism, with a comprehensive resource that brings together nursing practice, education and leadership. We believe that the nurse''s role has become increasingly demanding, which is why we have made some important updates to the journal. It now has more clinical content, more practical features - with clear learning outcomes – and new ''bitesize'' articles designed for accessibility. These changes have been made for one reason – to help easily obtain essential information you can trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信