无人机辅助实时视频指导反馈有助于提高非专业旁观者基本生命支持的质量。随机对照模拟试验。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Calvin Lukas Kienbacher, Wolfgang Schreiber, Harald Herkner, Christoph Holzhacker, Christof C Chwojka, Katharina Tscherny, Alexander Egger, Verena Fuhrmann, Maximilian Niederer, Marco Neymayer, Larissa Bernert, Alexandra Gamsjäger, Isabella Grünbeck, Marietta B Heitger, Line Saleh, Sophie Schmidt, Stephanie Schönecker, Dilara Wirth, Kenneth A Williams, Dominik Roth
{"title":"无人机辅助实时视频指导反馈有助于提高非专业旁观者基本生命支持的质量。随机对照模拟试验。","authors":"Calvin Lukas Kienbacher, Wolfgang Schreiber, Harald Herkner, Christoph Holzhacker, Christof C Chwojka, Katharina Tscherny, Alexander Egger, Verena Fuhrmann, Maximilian Niederer, Marco Neymayer, Larissa Bernert, Alexandra Gamsjäger, Isabella Grünbeck, Marietta B Heitger, Line Saleh, Sophie Schmidt, Stephanie Schönecker, Dilara Wirth, Kenneth A Williams, Dominik Roth","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2351970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Telephone instructions are commonly used to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by lay bystanders. This usually implies an audio but no visual connection between the provider and the emergency medical telecommunicator. We aimed to investigate whether video-guided feedback via a camera drone enhances the quality of CPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled simulation trial. Lay rescuers performed 8 min of CPR on an objective feedback manikin. Participants were randomized to receive telephone instructions with (intervention group) or without (control group) a drone providing a visual connection with the telecommunicator after a 2-min run-in phase. Performed work (total compression depth minus total lean depth) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of effective chest compressions, average compression depth, subjective physical strain measured every 2 min, and dexterity in the nine-hole peg test after the scenario. Outcomes were compared using the <i>t</i>- and Mann Whitney-<i>U</i> tests. A two-sided <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 27 individuals (14 (52%) female, mean age 41 ± 14 years). Performed work was greater in the intervention than in the control group (41.3 ± 7.0 vs. 33.9 ± 10.9 m; absolute difference 7.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 14.8; <i>p</i> = 0.046), with higher average compression depth (49 ± 7 vs. 40 ± 13 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.041), and higher proportions of adequate chest compressions (43 (IQR 14-60) vs. 3 (0-29) %; <i>p</i> = 0.041). We did not find any significant differences regarding the remaining secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-guided feedback via drones might be a helpful tool to enhance the quality of telephone-assisted CPR in lay bystanders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drone-Facilitated Real-Time Video-Guided Feedback Helps to Improve the Quality of Lay Bystander Basic Life Support. A Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Calvin Lukas Kienbacher, Wolfgang Schreiber, Harald Herkner, Christoph Holzhacker, Christof C Chwojka, Katharina Tscherny, Alexander Egger, Verena Fuhrmann, Maximilian Niederer, Marco Neymayer, Larissa Bernert, Alexandra Gamsjäger, Isabella Grünbeck, Marietta B Heitger, Line Saleh, Sophie Schmidt, Stephanie Schönecker, Dilara Wirth, Kenneth A Williams, Dominik Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2351970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Telephone instructions are commonly used to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by lay bystanders. This usually implies an audio but no visual connection between the provider and the emergency medical telecommunicator. We aimed to investigate whether video-guided feedback via a camera drone enhances the quality of CPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled simulation trial. Lay rescuers performed 8 min of CPR on an objective feedback manikin. Participants were randomized to receive telephone instructions with (intervention group) or without (control group) a drone providing a visual connection with the telecommunicator after a 2-min run-in phase. Performed work (total compression depth minus total lean depth) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of effective chest compressions, average compression depth, subjective physical strain measured every 2 min, and dexterity in the nine-hole peg test after the scenario. Outcomes were compared using the <i>t</i>- and Mann Whitney-<i>U</i> tests. A two-sided <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 27 individuals (14 (52%) female, mean age 41 ± 14 years). Performed work was greater in the intervention than in the control group (41.3 ± 7.0 vs. 33.9 ± 10.9 m; absolute difference 7.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 14.8; <i>p</i> = 0.046), with higher average compression depth (49 ± 7 vs. 40 ± 13 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.041), and higher proportions of adequate chest compressions (43 (IQR 14-60) vs. 3 (0-29) %; <i>p</i> = 0.041). We did not find any significant differences regarding the remaining secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-guided feedback via drones might be a helpful tool to enhance the quality of telephone-assisted CPR in lay bystanders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2351970\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2351970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:电话指导通常用于改善非专业旁观者的心肺复苏(CPR)。这通常意味着提供者与紧急医疗电话通讯员之间有音频但无视频连接。我们的目的是研究通过无人机摄像进行视频指导反馈是否能提高心肺复苏术的质量:我们采用了随机对照模拟试验。非专业救援人员在客观反馈人体模型上进行了 8 分钟的心肺复苏。参与者被随机分配到有无人机(干预组)或没有无人机(对照组)的情况下接受电话指导,无人机会在 2 分钟的磨合阶段后提供与电话接线员的视觉连接。主要结果是完成的工作量(总压缩深度减去总倾斜深度)。次要结果是有效胸外按压的比例、平均按压深度、每两分钟的主观体力负荷以及情景模拟后九孔钉测试的灵巧性。结果比较采用 t 检验和 Mann Whitney-U 检验。双侧 p 值为结果:我们纳入了 27 人(14 人(52%)为女性,平均年龄为 41 ± 14 岁)。与对照组相比,无人机组完成的工作量更大(41.3 ± 7.0 对 33.9 ± 10.9 米;绝对差异 7.5,95% CI 1.4 至 14.8;p = 0.046),平均按压深度更高(49 ± 7 对 40 ± 13 毫米;p = 0.041),胸外按压充分的比例更高(43 (IQR 14-60) 对 3 (0-29) %;p = 0.041)。在其余次要结果方面,我们没有发现任何明显差异:结论:通过无人机进行视频指导反馈可能是一种有用的工具,有助于提高非专业旁观者电话辅助心肺复苏的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drone-Facilitated Real-Time Video-Guided Feedback Helps to Improve the Quality of Lay Bystander Basic Life Support. A Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial.

Objectives: Telephone instructions are commonly used to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by lay bystanders. This usually implies an audio but no visual connection between the provider and the emergency medical telecommunicator. We aimed to investigate whether video-guided feedback via a camera drone enhances the quality of CPR.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled simulation trial. Lay rescuers performed 8 min of CPR on an objective feedback manikin. Participants were randomized to receive telephone instructions with (intervention group) or without (control group) a drone providing a visual connection with the telecommunicator after a 2-min run-in phase. Performed work (total compression depth minus total lean depth) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of effective chest compressions, average compression depth, subjective physical strain measured every 2 min, and dexterity in the nine-hole peg test after the scenario. Outcomes were compared using the t- and Mann Whitney-U tests. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: We included 27 individuals (14 (52%) female, mean age 41 ± 14 years). Performed work was greater in the intervention than in the control group (41.3 ± 7.0 vs. 33.9 ± 10.9 m; absolute difference 7.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 14.8; p = 0.046), with higher average compression depth (49 ± 7 vs. 40 ± 13 mm; p = 0.041), and higher proportions of adequate chest compressions (43 (IQR 14-60) vs. 3 (0-29) %; p = 0.041). We did not find any significant differences regarding the remaining secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Video-guided feedback via drones might be a helpful tool to enhance the quality of telephone-assisted CPR in lay bystanders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信