CT 测量的 LA 直径能否预测左心室舒张功能障碍的存在和程度?

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.194
Gae An Kim, Ji Ung Na, Dong Hyuk Shin, Jang Hee Lee
{"title":"CT 测量的 LA 直径能否预测左心室舒张功能障碍的存在和程度?","authors":"Gae An Kim, Ji Ung Na, Dong Hyuk Shin, Jang Hee Lee","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to determine whether the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) can be predicted by the simple computed tomography -measured left atrial diameter (CTLAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among adult patients who underwent both chest CT imaging and echocardiography in the emergency department from January 2020 to December 2021, a retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients in whom the time interval between the two tests was <24 hours. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of CTLAD for echocardiographic LVDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a study involving 373 patients, 192 (51.5%) had LVDD. Among them, 122 (63.5%) had grade 1, 61 (31.8%) had grade 2, and nine (4.7%) had ≥grade 3. Median CTLAD values were 4.1 cm for grade 1, 4.5 cm for grade 2, and 4.9 cm for ≥grade 3. The area under the ROC curve value of CTLAD in distinguishing ≥grade 1, ≥grade 2 (optimal cutoff ≥4.4 cm), and ≥grade 3 (optimal cutoff ≥4.5 cm) were 0.588, 0.657 (sensitivity, 61.4%; specificity, 66.0%, positive predictive value, 29.5%; negative predictive value, 88.1%; odds ratio, 3.1), and 0.834 (sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 70.1%; positive predictive value, 6.8%; negative predictive value, 99.6%, odds ratio, 18.7), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CTLAD ≥4.4 cm can be used as a rough reference value to distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 2, while CTLAD ≥4.5 cm can reliably distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 3. CTLAD might be a useful parameter for predicting LVDD in situations where echocardiography is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can left atrial diameter measured by computed tomography predict the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction?\",\"authors\":\"Gae An Kim, Ji Ung Na, Dong Hyuk Shin, Jang Hee Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.24.194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to determine whether the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) can be predicted by the simple computed tomography -measured left atrial diameter (CTLAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among adult patients who underwent both chest CT imaging and echocardiography in the emergency department from January 2020 to December 2021, a retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients in whom the time interval between the two tests was <24 hours. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of CTLAD for echocardiographic LVDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a study involving 373 patients, 192 (51.5%) had LVDD. Among them, 122 (63.5%) had grade 1, 61 (31.8%) had grade 2, and nine (4.7%) had ≥grade 3. Median CTLAD values were 4.1 cm for grade 1, 4.5 cm for grade 2, and 4.9 cm for ≥grade 3. The area under the ROC curve value of CTLAD in distinguishing ≥grade 1, ≥grade 2 (optimal cutoff ≥4.4 cm), and ≥grade 3 (optimal cutoff ≥4.5 cm) were 0.588, 0.657 (sensitivity, 61.4%; specificity, 66.0%, positive predictive value, 29.5%; negative predictive value, 88.1%; odds ratio, 3.1), and 0.834 (sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 70.1%; positive predictive value, 6.8%; negative predictive value, 99.6%, odds ratio, 18.7), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CTLAD ≥4.4 cm can be used as a rough reference value to distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 2, while CTLAD ≥4.5 cm can reliably distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 3. CTLAD might be a useful parameter for predicting LVDD in situations where echocardiography is not available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"358-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定是否可以通过计算机断层扫描(CTLAD)测量的简单LA直径预测左心室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)的存在和程度:2020年1月至2021年12月期间,在急诊科接受胸部CT和超声心动图检查的成年患者中,对两次检查时间间隔小于24小时的患者进行了回顾性横断面研究。研究采用接收者操作特征曲线分析法评估 CTLAD 对超声心动图 LVDD 的诊断能力:在一项涉及 373 名患者的研究中,192 人(51.5%)患有 LVDD。其中,122 例(63.5%)为 1 级,61 例(31.8%)为 2 级,9 例(4.7%)为≥3 级 LVDD。1 级 LVDD 的 CTLAD 中位值为 4.1 厘米,2 级为 4.5 厘米,≥3 级为 4.9 厘米。CTLAD 在区分≥1 级、≥2 级(最佳临界值≥4.4cm)和≥3 级(最佳临界值≥4.5cm)LVDD 时的 AUC 值分别为 0.588、0.657(敏感性 61.4%,特异性 66.0%,阳性预测值 [PPV] 29.5%,阴性预测值 [NPV] 88.1%,比值比 [OR] 3.1)和 0.834(敏感性 88.9%,特异性 70.1%,PPV 6.8%,NPV 99.6%,OR 18.7):结论:CTLAD≥4.4cm可作为区分≥2级LVDD的粗略参考值,CTLAD≥4.5cm可非常可靠地区分≥3级LVDD。在没有超声心动图的情况下,CTLAD可能是预测LVDD的非常有用的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can left atrial diameter measured by computed tomography predict the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction?

Objective: This study was conducted to determine whether the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) can be predicted by the simple computed tomography -measured left atrial diameter (CTLAD).

Methods: Among adult patients who underwent both chest CT imaging and echocardiography in the emergency department from January 2020 to December 2021, a retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients in whom the time interval between the two tests was <24 hours. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of CTLAD for echocardiographic LVDD.

Results: In a study involving 373 patients, 192 (51.5%) had LVDD. Among them, 122 (63.5%) had grade 1, 61 (31.8%) had grade 2, and nine (4.7%) had ≥grade 3. Median CTLAD values were 4.1 cm for grade 1, 4.5 cm for grade 2, and 4.9 cm for ≥grade 3. The area under the ROC curve value of CTLAD in distinguishing ≥grade 1, ≥grade 2 (optimal cutoff ≥4.4 cm), and ≥grade 3 (optimal cutoff ≥4.5 cm) were 0.588, 0.657 (sensitivity, 61.4%; specificity, 66.0%, positive predictive value, 29.5%; negative predictive value, 88.1%; odds ratio, 3.1), and 0.834 (sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 70.1%; positive predictive value, 6.8%; negative predictive value, 99.6%, odds ratio, 18.7), respectively.

Conclusion: CTLAD ≥4.4 cm can be used as a rough reference value to distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 2, while CTLAD ≥4.5 cm can reliably distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 3. CTLAD might be a useful parameter for predicting LVDD in situations where echocardiography is not available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信