腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌:巴林一家医疗机构的临床和病理结果。

Q3 Medicine
The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-01
Khaled Nazzal, Layla Hasan, Asma Alqaseer, Hussain A Abdulla, Alaa S Majed, Mohamed A Abushwemeh, Esra S Salman, Mohamed Arafa, Ahmed Jawad
{"title":"腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌:巴林一家医疗机构的临床和病理结果。","authors":"Khaled Nazzal, Layla Hasan, Asma Alqaseer, Hussain A Abdulla, Alaa S Majed, Mohamed A Abushwemeh, Esra S Salman, Mohamed Arafa, Ahmed Jawad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal carcinoma is commonly diagnosed and accounts for an important cause of cancerrelated mortality worldwide. Despite that literature has shown the superiority of laparoscopic surgery, with improved short-term clinical benefits and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open surgery for colorectal cancer, most cases are operated by open approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and pathological outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>126 patients who had operations for colorectal cancers were identified. Patients ' clinical data, surgery type and details, postoperative early clinical outcomes and histology reports were retrieved from the database and retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was used to assess the differences between laparoscopy and open approach in terms of clinical and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant advantages were associated with minimally invasive colorectal surgery, with shorter postoperative hospital stay, less incidence of medical complications and improved survival. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in pathological parameters, namely, number of retrieved lymph nodes and margins.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the hands of skilled trained surgeons, laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is oncologically safe as it showed adequate dissection and appropriate number of resected lymph nodes, and is associated with reduction in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Conversion to open surgery is a risk associated with minimally invasive surgery. However, it is reported that conversion and postoperative complications are decreasing with increased surgical experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In accordance with the current worldwide practice, our study indicates that minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer has the benefits of laparoscopy in terms of short-term clinical outcomes but show similar pathological outcomes in comparison to open approach. With increased surgical expertise, laparoscopic surgery is becoming the standard approach to treat colorectal cancer in our centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":"1 45","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancers: Clinical and Pathological Outcomes from a Single Institution in Bahrain.\",\"authors\":\"Khaled Nazzal, Layla Hasan, Asma Alqaseer, Hussain A Abdulla, Alaa S Majed, Mohamed A Abushwemeh, Esra S Salman, Mohamed Arafa, Ahmed Jawad\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal carcinoma is commonly diagnosed and accounts for an important cause of cancerrelated mortality worldwide. Despite that literature has shown the superiority of laparoscopic surgery, with improved short-term clinical benefits and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open surgery for colorectal cancer, most cases are operated by open approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and pathological outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>126 patients who had operations for colorectal cancers were identified. Patients ' clinical data, surgery type and details, postoperative early clinical outcomes and histology reports were retrieved from the database and retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was used to assess the differences between laparoscopy and open approach in terms of clinical and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant advantages were associated with minimally invasive colorectal surgery, with shorter postoperative hospital stay, less incidence of medical complications and improved survival. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in pathological parameters, namely, number of retrieved lymph nodes and margins.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the hands of skilled trained surgeons, laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is oncologically safe as it showed adequate dissection and appropriate number of resected lymph nodes, and is associated with reduction in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Conversion to open surgery is a risk associated with minimally invasive surgery. However, it is reported that conversion and postoperative complications are decreasing with increased surgical experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In accordance with the current worldwide practice, our study indicates that minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer has the benefits of laparoscopy in terms of short-term clinical outcomes but show similar pathological outcomes in comparison to open approach. With increased surgical expertise, laparoscopic surgery is becoming the standard approach to treat colorectal cancer in our centre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The gulf journal of oncology\",\"volume\":\"1 45\",\"pages\":\"64-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The gulf journal of oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:结直肠癌是一种常见的癌症,也是全球癌症相关死亡率的重要原因之一。尽管有文献显示腹腔镜手术具有优越性,与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术能改善结直肠癌的短期临床疗效,并获得同等的肿瘤治疗效果,但大多数病例仍采用开腹手术。本研究的目的是比较本院腹腔镜和开腹结直肠癌手术的临床和病理结果。从数据库中检索患者的临床数据、手术类型和细节、术后早期临床结果和组织学报告,并进行回顾性审查。统计分析用于评估腹腔镜手术与开腹手术在临床和肿瘤结果方面的差异:结果:微创结直肠手术具有显著优势,术后住院时间短,医疗并发症发生率低,生存率高。两组患者在病理参数,即取材淋巴结数量和边缘方面的差异无统计学意义:讨论:在训练有素的熟练外科医生手中,腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌在肿瘤学上是安全的,因为腹腔镜手术显示了充分的清扫和适当数量的淋巴结切除,并且与术后发病率和死亡率的降低有关。微创手术存在转为开放手术的风险。不过,据报道,随着手术经验的增加,转为开放手术的风险和术后并发症正在减少:我们的研究表明,根据目前世界范围内的实践,微创手术治疗结直肠癌在短期临床效果方面具有腹腔镜手术的优势,但与开腹手术相比,其病理结果相似。随着外科专业技术的提高,腹腔镜手术正成为本中心治疗结直肠癌的标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancers: Clinical and Pathological Outcomes from a Single Institution in Bahrain.

Introduction: Colorectal carcinoma is commonly diagnosed and accounts for an important cause of cancerrelated mortality worldwide. Despite that literature has shown the superiority of laparoscopic surgery, with improved short-term clinical benefits and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open surgery for colorectal cancer, most cases are operated by open approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and pathological outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery at our institution.

Methodology: 126 patients who had operations for colorectal cancers were identified. Patients ' clinical data, surgery type and details, postoperative early clinical outcomes and histology reports were retrieved from the database and retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was used to assess the differences between laparoscopy and open approach in terms of clinical and oncological outcomes.

Results: Significant advantages were associated with minimally invasive colorectal surgery, with shorter postoperative hospital stay, less incidence of medical complications and improved survival. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in pathological parameters, namely, number of retrieved lymph nodes and margins.

Discussion: In the hands of skilled trained surgeons, laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is oncologically safe as it showed adequate dissection and appropriate number of resected lymph nodes, and is associated with reduction in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Conversion to open surgery is a risk associated with minimally invasive surgery. However, it is reported that conversion and postoperative complications are decreasing with increased surgical experience.

Conclusion: In accordance with the current worldwide practice, our study indicates that minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer has the benefits of laparoscopy in terms of short-term clinical outcomes but show similar pathological outcomes in comparison to open approach. With increased surgical expertise, laparoscopic surgery is becoming the standard approach to treat colorectal cancer in our centre.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信