精神科医生和精神科实习生使用个人疗法:系统性综述。

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
R E Aubry, M Morgan, G Donohue
{"title":"精神科医生和精神科实习生使用个人疗法:系统性综述。","authors":"R E Aubry, M Morgan, G Donohue","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2024.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely acknowledged that personal therapy positively contributes to the continued personal well-being and ongoing professional development of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists. As a result, most training bodies continue to recommend personal therapy to their trainees. Given its reported value and benefits, one might hypothesize that a high proportion of psychiatrists avail of personal therapy. This systematic review seeks to investigate whether this is the case.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and evaluate the findings derived from all available survey-based studies reporting quantitative data regarding psychiatrists' and psychiatry trainees' engagement in personal therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search for survey-based studies about the use of personal therapy by psychiatric practitioners was conducted in four databases and platforms (PubMed, Scopus, Embase and EbscoHost) from inception to May 2022 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using the quality assessment checklist for survey studies in psychology (Q-SSP) and findings summarized using narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of trainees who engaged in personal therapy ranged from a low of 13.4% in a recent UK based study to a high of 65.3% among Israeli residents. The proportion of fully qualified psychiatrists who engaged in personal therapy varied from 32.1% in South Korea to 89% in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review represents the first known attempt to collect and synthesize data aimed at providing insights into the past and current trends in psychiatrists' use of personal therapy across different geographic regions and career stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of personal therapy by psychiatrists and psychiatry trainees: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"R E Aubry, M Morgan, G Donohue\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ipm.2024.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely acknowledged that personal therapy positively contributes to the continued personal well-being and ongoing professional development of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists. As a result, most training bodies continue to recommend personal therapy to their trainees. Given its reported value and benefits, one might hypothesize that a high proportion of psychiatrists avail of personal therapy. This systematic review seeks to investigate whether this is the case.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and evaluate the findings derived from all available survey-based studies reporting quantitative data regarding psychiatrists' and psychiatry trainees' engagement in personal therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search for survey-based studies about the use of personal therapy by psychiatric practitioners was conducted in four databases and platforms (PubMed, Scopus, Embase and EbscoHost) from inception to May 2022 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using the quality assessment checklist for survey studies in psychology (Q-SSP) and findings summarized using narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of trainees who engaged in personal therapy ranged from a low of 13.4% in a recent UK based study to a high of 65.3% among Israeli residents. The proportion of fully qualified psychiatrists who engaged in personal therapy varied from 32.1% in South Korea to 89% in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review represents the first known attempt to collect and synthesize data aimed at providing insights into the past and current trends in psychiatrists' use of personal therapy across different geographic regions and career stages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们普遍认为,个人治疗对心理健康专业人员(包括精神科医生)的持续个人健康和持续专业发展有积极的促进作用。因此,大多数培训机构继续向学员推荐个人疗法。鉴于个人疗法的价值和益处,我们可以推测有很大一部分精神科医生都会采用个人疗法。本系统性综述旨在调查事实是否如此。目的:确定并评估所有基于调查的研究中有关精神科医生和精神科受训人员参与个人治疗的定量数据:方法:根据系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南,在四个数据库和平台(PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 EbscoHost)上对精神科从业人员使用个人疗法的调查研究进行了系统性检索,检索时间从开始到 2022 年 5 月。研究采用心理学调查研究质量评估清单(Q-SSP)进行质量评估,并采用叙事综合法对研究结果进行总结:参与个人治疗的受训人员比例不等,在英国最近的一项研究中最低为 13.4%,而在以色列居民中则高达 65.3%。完全合格的精神科医生中进行个人治疗的比例从韩国的 32.1% 到新西兰的 89% 不等:本综述首次尝试收集和综合数据,旨在深入了解不同地区和职业阶段的精神科医生过去和现在使用个人疗法的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of personal therapy by psychiatrists and psychiatry trainees: a systematic review.

Background: It is widely acknowledged that personal therapy positively contributes to the continued personal well-being and ongoing professional development of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists. As a result, most training bodies continue to recommend personal therapy to their trainees. Given its reported value and benefits, one might hypothesize that a high proportion of psychiatrists avail of personal therapy. This systematic review seeks to investigate whether this is the case.

Aim: To identify and evaluate the findings derived from all available survey-based studies reporting quantitative data regarding psychiatrists' and psychiatry trainees' engagement in personal therapy.

Method: A systematic search for survey-based studies about the use of personal therapy by psychiatric practitioners was conducted in four databases and platforms (PubMed, Scopus, Embase and EbscoHost) from inception to May 2022 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using the quality assessment checklist for survey studies in psychology (Q-SSP) and findings summarized using narrative synthesis.

Results: The proportion of trainees who engaged in personal therapy ranged from a low of 13.4% in a recent UK based study to a high of 65.3% among Israeli residents. The proportion of fully qualified psychiatrists who engaged in personal therapy varied from 32.1% in South Korea to 89% in New Zealand.

Conclusion: This review represents the first known attempt to collect and synthesize data aimed at providing insights into the past and current trends in psychiatrists' use of personal therapy across different geographic regions and career stages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信