癌症幸存者护理需求讨论:农村与城市之间是否存在不平等?

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002014
Tyrone F Borders, Lindsey Hammerslag
{"title":"癌症幸存者护理需求讨论:农村与城市之间是否存在不平等?","authors":"Tyrone F Borders, Lindsey Hammerslag","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural cancer survivors may face greater challenges receiving survivorship care than urban cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test for rural versus urban inequities and identify other correlates of discussions about cancer survivorship care with healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which included a cancer survivorship supplement. Adult survivors were asked if they discussed with a healthcare professional 5 components of survivorship care: need for follow-up services, lifestyle/health recommendations, emotional/social needs, long-term side effects, and a summary of treatments received. The Behavioral Model of Health Services guided the inclusion of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in ordered logit regression models of each survivorship care variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly lower proportion of rural than urban survivors (42% rural, 52% urban) discussed in detail the treatments they received, but this difference did not persist in the multivariable model. Although 69% of rural and 70% of urban ssurvivors discussed in detail their follow-up care needs, less than 50% of both rural and urban survivors discussed in detail other dimensions of survivorship care. Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and time since treatment were associated with lower odds of discussing 3 or more dimensions of survivorship care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found only a single rural/urban difference in discussions about survivorship care. With the exception of discussions about the need for follow-up care, rates of discussing in detail other dimensions of survivorship care were low among rural and urban survivors alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussions of Cancer Survivorship Care Needs: Are There Rural Versus Urban Inequities?\",\"authors\":\"Tyrone F Borders, Lindsey Hammerslag\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural cancer survivors may face greater challenges receiving survivorship care than urban cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test for rural versus urban inequities and identify other correlates of discussions about cancer survivorship care with healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which included a cancer survivorship supplement. Adult survivors were asked if they discussed with a healthcare professional 5 components of survivorship care: need for follow-up services, lifestyle/health recommendations, emotional/social needs, long-term side effects, and a summary of treatments received. The Behavioral Model of Health Services guided the inclusion of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in ordered logit regression models of each survivorship care variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly lower proportion of rural than urban survivors (42% rural, 52% urban) discussed in detail the treatments they received, but this difference did not persist in the multivariable model. Although 69% of rural and 70% of urban ssurvivors discussed in detail their follow-up care needs, less than 50% of both rural and urban survivors discussed in detail other dimensions of survivorship care. Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and time since treatment were associated with lower odds of discussing 3 or more dimensions of survivorship care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found only a single rural/urban difference in discussions about survivorship care. With the exception of discussions about the need for follow-up care, rates of discussing in detail other dimensions of survivorship care were low among rural and urban survivors alike.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155275/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与城市癌症幸存者相比,农村癌症幸存者在接受幸存者护理方面可能面临更大的挑战:目的:检验农村与城市之间的不平等,并确定与医疗保健专业人员讨论癌症幸存者护理的其他相关因素:数据来自2017年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS),其中包括癌症幸存者补充调查。成年幸存者被问及是否与医疗保健专业人员讨论过幸存者护理的 5 项内容:后续服务需求、生活方式/健康建议、情感/社会需求、长期副作用以及所接受治疗的总结。在健康服务行为模型的指导下,在每个幸存者护理变量的有序对数回归模型中纳入了易感因素、有利因素和需求因素:农村幸存者详细讨论所接受治疗的比例明显低于城市幸存者(农村为 42%,城市为 52%),但这一差异在多变量模型中并不存在。尽管69%的农村幸存者和70%的城市幸存者详细讨论了他们的后续护理需求,但只有不到50%的农村幸存者和城市幸存者详细讨论了幸存者护理的其他方面。非西班牙裔黑人种族/人种和治疗后时间与讨论 3 个或更多幸存者护理方面的几率较低有关:本研究发现,在有关幸存者护理的讨论中,城乡之间只有一个差异。除了关于后续护理需求的讨论外,农村和城市幸存者详细讨论幸存者护理其他方面的比率都很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussions of Cancer Survivorship Care Needs: Are There Rural Versus Urban Inequities?

Background: Rural cancer survivors may face greater challenges receiving survivorship care than urban cancer survivors.

Purpose: To test for rural versus urban inequities and identify other correlates of discussions about cancer survivorship care with healthcare professionals.

Methods: Data are from the 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which included a cancer survivorship supplement. Adult survivors were asked if they discussed with a healthcare professional 5 components of survivorship care: need for follow-up services, lifestyle/health recommendations, emotional/social needs, long-term side effects, and a summary of treatments received. The Behavioral Model of Health Services guided the inclusion of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in ordered logit regression models of each survivorship care variable.

Results: A significantly lower proportion of rural than urban survivors (42% rural, 52% urban) discussed in detail the treatments they received, but this difference did not persist in the multivariable model. Although 69% of rural and 70% of urban ssurvivors discussed in detail their follow-up care needs, less than 50% of both rural and urban survivors discussed in detail other dimensions of survivorship care. Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and time since treatment were associated with lower odds of discussing 3 or more dimensions of survivorship care.

Conclusions: This study found only a single rural/urban difference in discussions about survivorship care. With the exception of discussions about the need for follow-up care, rates of discussing in detail other dimensions of survivorship care were low among rural and urban survivors alike.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信