迭戈-委拉斯开兹,他的时代:费利佩四世画家作品中的历史与虚构》,Héctor Ruiz Soto 著(评论)

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Jeremy Roe
{"title":"迭戈-委拉斯开兹,他的时代:费利佩四世画家作品中的历史与虚构》,Héctor Ruiz Soto 著(评论)","authors":"Jeremy Roe","doi":"10.1353/boc.2022.a927779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV</em> by Héctor Ruiz Soto <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jeremy Roe </li> </ul> Héctor Ruiz Soto. <em>Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV</em>. BELIN ÉDUCATION / HUMENSIS, 2021. 182 PP. <p><strong>THE PUBLICATION</strong> of a new monographic study of the life and work of Diego Velázquez is an event not to be overlooked, and this book is no exception. First, it offers an insightful introduction to the work of Velázquez that engages with a range of recent research on the artist's life, paintings, and cultural context. As such it will undoubtedly provide a valuable teaching aid. Ruiz Soto's prose is well paced, and his succinct discussion of art historical, literary, cultural, and political themes distills for a new generation of students and scholars the major historiographical advances made in Velázquez studies over the last few decades by Jonathan Brown and John Elliott—needless to say—as well as Svetlana Alpers, Julián Gallego, Giles Knox, Felipe Pereda, and Victor Stoichita, among others. I highlight this facet of his book first, as it is seemingly the publisher's intended readership. The generic textbook cover informs the reader that <em>Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo</em> is intended to <em>réussir</em>, and, in this case, put to very good use, the author's <em>agrégation d'espagnol</em>: Ruiz's book forms part of a collaboration between the publisher and France's Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance. Presenting scholarly research for a student readership is by no means an easy task, and Ruiz's work is an excellent example of how successfully this can be done. Nevertheless, one shortcoming of this book is its lack of images. As a volume that analyzes pictorial composition and color, it might have been better off as an exclusively digital publication, which would have permitted a greater budget for image rights, as well as the possibility of adding hyperlinks within the text to the many images discussed.</p> <p>Nevertheless, it would be wrong to judge this book by its cover and pigeonhole it merely as undergraduate reading. Indeed, the second reason to hail the publication of this book is that it is more than a textbook. Despite the academic constraints of the <em>agrégation</em> and those imposed by the publisher, the author presents an approach to the life and work of Velázquez that merits the attention of those already immersed in the current debates and critical minutiae of Velázquez studies and Spanish Golden Age culture more broadly. <strong>[End Page 455]</strong> For those already acquainted with Ruiz's scholarship on Golden Age theater, Góngora, and other early modern Spanish authors, this will come as no surprise; the footnotes, unlike the book's somewhat cursory bibliography, reveal how a wealth of scholarship is condensed, into this work. Admittedly, his ideas are at times overly condensed, and intriguing concepts are not pursued in the depth required to fully develop them.</p> <p>The introduction is one example of this. It offers a reflection on \"the relationship between history, painting, and fiction,\" which Ruiz claims he will explore by addressing issues of \"style, composition, pictorial genres, the functions of painting, as well as its historicity and metapictorial discourse\" (10; translation mine). The scholarship on Golden Age literature and, in particular, the relationships between painting and poetic and theatrical writing are a key facet of this opening discussion, which invokes a range of theoretical questions such as literary and artistic invention, veracity and verisimilitude, stylistic modes such as sobriety and grandeur, as well as the practice of ekphrasis. A fundamental concern of the parallel drawn between word and image is to address what Brown termed Velázquez's \"oblique attitude\" to narration, to which Ruiz responds by arguing that Velázquez was a \"child of his time, who appreciated difficulty in poetry\" (24). For Ruiz such difficulty is synonymous with Góngora's verse, and this is above all identified with Velázquez's final two mythological paintings: <em>Mercury and Argus</em> (ca. 1659) and <em>The Spinners, or the Fable of Arachne...</em></p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42292,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV by Héctor Ruiz Soto (review)\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Roe\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/boc.2022.a927779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV</em> by Héctor Ruiz Soto <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jeremy Roe </li> </ul> Héctor Ruiz Soto. <em>Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV</em>. BELIN ÉDUCATION / HUMENSIS, 2021. 182 PP. <p><strong>THE PUBLICATION</strong> of a new monographic study of the life and work of Diego Velázquez is an event not to be overlooked, and this book is no exception. First, it offers an insightful introduction to the work of Velázquez that engages with a range of recent research on the artist's life, paintings, and cultural context. As such it will undoubtedly provide a valuable teaching aid. Ruiz Soto's prose is well paced, and his succinct discussion of art historical, literary, cultural, and political themes distills for a new generation of students and scholars the major historiographical advances made in Velázquez studies over the last few decades by Jonathan Brown and John Elliott—needless to say—as well as Svetlana Alpers, Julián Gallego, Giles Knox, Felipe Pereda, and Victor Stoichita, among others. I highlight this facet of his book first, as it is seemingly the publisher's intended readership. The generic textbook cover informs the reader that <em>Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo</em> is intended to <em>réussir</em>, and, in this case, put to very good use, the author's <em>agrégation d'espagnol</em>: Ruiz's book forms part of a collaboration between the publisher and France's Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance. Presenting scholarly research for a student readership is by no means an easy task, and Ruiz's work is an excellent example of how successfully this can be done. Nevertheless, one shortcoming of this book is its lack of images. As a volume that analyzes pictorial composition and color, it might have been better off as an exclusively digital publication, which would have permitted a greater budget for image rights, as well as the possibility of adding hyperlinks within the text to the many images discussed.</p> <p>Nevertheless, it would be wrong to judge this book by its cover and pigeonhole it merely as undergraduate reading. Indeed, the second reason to hail the publication of this book is that it is more than a textbook. Despite the academic constraints of the <em>agrégation</em> and those imposed by the publisher, the author presents an approach to the life and work of Velázquez that merits the attention of those already immersed in the current debates and critical minutiae of Velázquez studies and Spanish Golden Age culture more broadly. <strong>[End Page 455]</strong> For those already acquainted with Ruiz's scholarship on Golden Age theater, Góngora, and other early modern Spanish authors, this will come as no surprise; the footnotes, unlike the book's somewhat cursory bibliography, reveal how a wealth of scholarship is condensed, into this work. Admittedly, his ideas are at times overly condensed, and intriguing concepts are not pursued in the depth required to fully develop them.</p> <p>The introduction is one example of this. It offers a reflection on \\\"the relationship between history, painting, and fiction,\\\" which Ruiz claims he will explore by addressing issues of \\\"style, composition, pictorial genres, the functions of painting, as well as its historicity and metapictorial discourse\\\" (10; translation mine). The scholarship on Golden Age literature and, in particular, the relationships between painting and poetic and theatrical writing are a key facet of this opening discussion, which invokes a range of theoretical questions such as literary and artistic invention, veracity and verisimilitude, stylistic modes such as sobriety and grandeur, as well as the practice of ekphrasis. A fundamental concern of the parallel drawn between word and image is to address what Brown termed Velázquez's \\\"oblique attitude\\\" to narration, to which Ruiz responds by arguing that Velázquez was a \\\"child of his time, who appreciated difficulty in poetry\\\" (24). For Ruiz such difficulty is synonymous with Góngora's verse, and this is above all identified with Velázquez's final two mythological paintings: <em>Mercury and Argus</em> (ca. 1659) and <em>The Spinners, or the Fable of Arachne...</em></p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/boc.2022.a927779\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/boc.2022.a927779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV by Héctor Ruiz Soto Jeremy Roe Héctor Ruiz Soto.Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV.Belin éducation / Humensis, 2021.182 PP.关于迭戈-委拉斯开兹生平和作品的新专著的出版是一件不容忽视的大事,本书也不例外。首先,该书对委拉斯开兹的作品进行了深入浅出的介绍,并对艺术家的生平、绘画和文化背景进行了一系列最新研究。因此,它无疑将为教学提供宝贵的帮助。鲁伊斯-索托的散文节奏明快,他对艺术史、文学、文化和政治主题的简明论述,为新一代学生和学者提炼了乔纳森-布朗和约翰-艾略特--不用说--以及斯韦特兰娜-阿尔珀斯、胡利安-加列戈、吉尔斯-诺克斯、费利佩-佩雷达和维克多-斯托伊奇塔等人在过去几十年里在委拉斯开兹研究方面取得的重大史学进展。我首先要强调的是他书中的这个方面,因为这似乎是出版商的目标读者群。一般教科书的封面告诉读者,Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo 的目的是让读者了解作者的西班牙语水平,在此书中,作者的西班牙语水平得到了很好的运用:鲁伊斯的这本书是出版社与法国国家远程教育中心合作的一部分。为学生读者呈现学术研究绝非易事,而鲁伊斯的作品则是成功做到这一点的典范。然而,本书的一个不足之处是缺少图片。作为一本分析绘画构图和色彩的专著,它可能更适合作为一本纯粹的数字出版物,这样就可以有更多的预算来购买图片版权,也可以在文本中添加超链接来链接所讨论的众多图片。尽管如此,如果只从封面来判断这本书,将其视为本科生读物,那就大错特错了。事实上,称赞本书出版的第二个原因是,它不仅仅是一本教科书。尽管受到协议和出版商强加的学术限制,但作者对委拉斯开兹的生平和作品提出了一种方法,值得那些已经沉浸在委拉斯开兹研究和更广泛的西班牙黄金时代文化的当前辩论和批评琐事中的人关注。[对于那些已经熟悉鲁伊斯关于黄金时代戏剧、贡戈拉和其他早期现代西班牙作家的学术研究的人来说,这并不奇怪;与本书略显粗略的参考书目不同,脚注揭示了大量学术研究是如何浓缩到这部作品中的。不可否认的是,他的观点有时过于凝练,对一些耐人寻味的概念也没有深入探讨以充分展开。导言就是一个例子。引言对 "历史、绘画和小说之间的关系 "进行了反思,鲁伊斯声称他将通过探讨 "风格、构图、绘画流派、绘画的功能及其历史性和元绘画话语"(10;译者注)等问题来探讨这一关系。关于黄金时代文学的学术研究,尤其是绘画与诗歌和戏剧写作之间的关系,是这一开篇讨论的一个重要方面,它引出了一系列理论问题,如文学和艺术创作、真实性和真实性、风格模式(如简洁和华丽)以及咏物诗的实践。文字与图像之间的平行关系的一个根本问题是要解决布朗所说的委拉斯开兹对叙述的 "斜视态度",鲁伊斯对此回应说,委拉斯开兹是 "他那个时代的孩子,他欣赏诗歌中的困难"(24)。在鲁伊斯看来,这种难度是贡戈拉诗歌的同义词,而这首先与委拉斯开兹的最后两幅神话画作相吻合:墨丘利与阿耳戈斯》(约 1659 年)和《纺纱者,或阿拉克涅的寓言》......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV by Héctor Ruiz Soto (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV by Héctor Ruiz Soto
  • Jeremy Roe
Héctor Ruiz Soto. Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo: historia y ficción en la obra del pintor de Felipe IV. BELIN ÉDUCATION / HUMENSIS, 2021. 182 PP.

THE PUBLICATION of a new monographic study of the life and work of Diego Velázquez is an event not to be overlooked, and this book is no exception. First, it offers an insightful introduction to the work of Velázquez that engages with a range of recent research on the artist's life, paintings, and cultural context. As such it will undoubtedly provide a valuable teaching aid. Ruiz Soto's prose is well paced, and his succinct discussion of art historical, literary, cultural, and political themes distills for a new generation of students and scholars the major historiographical advances made in Velázquez studies over the last few decades by Jonathan Brown and John Elliott—needless to say—as well as Svetlana Alpers, Julián Gallego, Giles Knox, Felipe Pereda, and Victor Stoichita, among others. I highlight this facet of his book first, as it is seemingly the publisher's intended readership. The generic textbook cover informs the reader that Diego Velázquez, Apeles de su siglo is intended to réussir, and, in this case, put to very good use, the author's agrégation d'espagnol: Ruiz's book forms part of a collaboration between the publisher and France's Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance. Presenting scholarly research for a student readership is by no means an easy task, and Ruiz's work is an excellent example of how successfully this can be done. Nevertheless, one shortcoming of this book is its lack of images. As a volume that analyzes pictorial composition and color, it might have been better off as an exclusively digital publication, which would have permitted a greater budget for image rights, as well as the possibility of adding hyperlinks within the text to the many images discussed.

Nevertheless, it would be wrong to judge this book by its cover and pigeonhole it merely as undergraduate reading. Indeed, the second reason to hail the publication of this book is that it is more than a textbook. Despite the academic constraints of the agrégation and those imposed by the publisher, the author presents an approach to the life and work of Velázquez that merits the attention of those already immersed in the current debates and critical minutiae of Velázquez studies and Spanish Golden Age culture more broadly. [End Page 455] For those already acquainted with Ruiz's scholarship on Golden Age theater, Góngora, and other early modern Spanish authors, this will come as no surprise; the footnotes, unlike the book's somewhat cursory bibliography, reveal how a wealth of scholarship is condensed, into this work. Admittedly, his ideas are at times overly condensed, and intriguing concepts are not pursued in the depth required to fully develop them.

The introduction is one example of this. It offers a reflection on "the relationship between history, painting, and fiction," which Ruiz claims he will explore by addressing issues of "style, composition, pictorial genres, the functions of painting, as well as its historicity and metapictorial discourse" (10; translation mine). The scholarship on Golden Age literature and, in particular, the relationships between painting and poetic and theatrical writing are a key facet of this opening discussion, which invokes a range of theoretical questions such as literary and artistic invention, veracity and verisimilitude, stylistic modes such as sobriety and grandeur, as well as the practice of ekphrasis. A fundamental concern of the parallel drawn between word and image is to address what Brown termed Velázquez's "oblique attitude" to narration, to which Ruiz responds by arguing that Velázquez was a "child of his time, who appreciated difficulty in poetry" (24). For Ruiz such difficulty is synonymous with Góngora's verse, and this is above all identified with Velázquez's final two mythological paintings: Mercury and Argus (ca. 1659) and The Spinners, or the Fable of Arachne...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published semiannually by the Comediantes, an international group of scholars interested in early modern Hispanic theater, the Bulletin welcomes articles and notes in Spanish and English dealing with sixteenth- and seventeenth-century peninsular and colonial Latin American drama. Submissions are refereed by at least two specialists in the field. In order to expedite a decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信