{"title":"为印度及其他地区的研究规划人员提供疟疾分子诊断成本分析。","authors":"Vandana Panwar, Shivani Bansal, Charu Chauhan, Abhinav Sinha","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2356172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria elimination mandates early and accurate diagnosis of infection. Although malaria diagnosis is programmatically dependent on microscopy/RDTs, molecular diagnosis has much better diagnostic accuracy. Higher cost of molecular diagnoses is a recognized challenge for use at the point of care. Because funding is always a recognized constraint, we performed financial cost-analyses of available molecular platforms for better utilization of available budget.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two strategies were applied to deduce the cost per sample. Strategy 1 included recurring components (RC) in minimum pack size, and biologist's time whereas strategy 2 included only RC and non-recurring components and costs are calculated for sample sizes (1-1,000,000) to infer the sample size effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spin column-based manual DNA extraction (US$ 3.93 per sample) is the lowest-cost method, followed by magnetic bead-based automated, semi-automated, and PCI-based manual method. Further, DNA extraction cost per sample via spin column-based manual method and semi-automated method decreases with an increase in sample size up to 10,000. Real-time PCRs are ~ 2-fold more economical than conventional PCR, regardless of sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first for malaria to estimate systematic molecular diagnosis financial costs. Kit-based and automated methods may replace conventional DNA extraction and amplification methods for a frugal high-throughput diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"549-559"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost analyses for malaria molecular diagnosis for research planners in India and beyond.\",\"authors\":\"Vandana Panwar, Shivani Bansal, Charu Chauhan, Abhinav Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737159.2024.2356172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria elimination mandates early and accurate diagnosis of infection. Although malaria diagnosis is programmatically dependent on microscopy/RDTs, molecular diagnosis has much better diagnostic accuracy. Higher cost of molecular diagnoses is a recognized challenge for use at the point of care. Because funding is always a recognized constraint, we performed financial cost-analyses of available molecular platforms for better utilization of available budget.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two strategies were applied to deduce the cost per sample. Strategy 1 included recurring components (RC) in minimum pack size, and biologist's time whereas strategy 2 included only RC and non-recurring components and costs are calculated for sample sizes (1-1,000,000) to infer the sample size effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spin column-based manual DNA extraction (US$ 3.93 per sample) is the lowest-cost method, followed by magnetic bead-based automated, semi-automated, and PCI-based manual method. Further, DNA extraction cost per sample via spin column-based manual method and semi-automated method decreases with an increase in sample size up to 10,000. Real-time PCRs are ~ 2-fold more economical than conventional PCR, regardless of sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first for malaria to estimate systematic molecular diagnosis financial costs. Kit-based and automated methods may replace conventional DNA extraction and amplification methods for a frugal high-throughput diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"549-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2356172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2356172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:消除疟疾要求对感染进行早期准确诊断。尽管疟疾诊断在程序上依赖于显微镜/RDT,但分子诊断的诊断准确性要高得多。分子诊断的成本较高,这对在医疗点使用分子诊断是一个公认的挑战。由于资金始终是公认的制约因素,我们对现有的分子平台进行了财务成本分析,以便更好地利用现有预算:方法:我们采用了两种策略来推算每个样本的成本。方法:采用两种策略推算每个样本的成本。策略 1 包括最小包装中的经常性成本(RC)和生物学家的时间,而策略 2 仅包括经常性成本和非经常性成本,并计算样本量(1-1,000,000)的成本,以推断样本量效应:结果:基于旋转柱的手动 DNA 提取(每个样本 3.93 美元)是成本最低的方法,其次是基于磁珠的自动、半自动和基于 PCI 的手动方法。此外,通过旋柱式手动方法和半自动方法提取每个样本的 DNA 成本随着样本量的增加而降低,最高可达 10,000 个样本。无论样本量多少,实时 PCR 都比传统 PCR 经济约 2 倍:这项研究首次对疟疾的系统分子诊断成本进行了估算。基于试剂盒的自动方法可取代传统的 DNA 提取和扩增方法,从而实现节俭的高通量诊断。
Cost analyses for malaria molecular diagnosis for research planners in India and beyond.
Background: Malaria elimination mandates early and accurate diagnosis of infection. Although malaria diagnosis is programmatically dependent on microscopy/RDTs, molecular diagnosis has much better diagnostic accuracy. Higher cost of molecular diagnoses is a recognized challenge for use at the point of care. Because funding is always a recognized constraint, we performed financial cost-analyses of available molecular platforms for better utilization of available budget.
Methods: Two strategies were applied to deduce the cost per sample. Strategy 1 included recurring components (RC) in minimum pack size, and biologist's time whereas strategy 2 included only RC and non-recurring components and costs are calculated for sample sizes (1-1,000,000) to infer the sample size effect.
Results: Spin column-based manual DNA extraction (US$ 3.93 per sample) is the lowest-cost method, followed by magnetic bead-based automated, semi-automated, and PCI-based manual method. Further, DNA extraction cost per sample via spin column-based manual method and semi-automated method decreases with an increase in sample size up to 10,000. Real-time PCRs are ~ 2-fold more economical than conventional PCR, regardless of sample size.
Conclusions: This study is the first for malaria to estimate systematic molecular diagnosis financial costs. Kit-based and automated methods may replace conventional DNA extraction and amplification methods for a frugal high-throughput diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.