实现全球净零排放:自愿碳市场在后巴黎气候机制中寻找自己的位置

Nicolas Kreibich
{"title":"实现全球净零排放:自愿碳市场在后巴黎气候机制中寻找自己的位置","authors":"Nicolas Kreibich","doi":"10.1002/wcc.892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This focus article traces the evolution of the voluntary carbon market (VCM), putting emphasis on the more recent developments following the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015. It focuses on the interplay between the privately governed VCM and the global climate regime under the United Nations (UN). For years, the VCM and the UN carbon market operated in parallel and mutually influenced each other. The adoption of the Paris Agreement, however, marked a turning point for the VCM. It triggered the proliferation of net zero targets, sparking the interest in the VCM as a supplier of carbon credits to offset companies' remaining emissions. At the same time, the global scope and ambitious targets set by the agreement have put the future of the VCM in limbo, raising concerns about double claiming and more generally, questioning the adequacy of offsetting. Considering these challenges, numerous stakeholders have started a process to redefine the rules of the market to ensure its credibility and legitimacy. While some areas of convergence were identified, the VCM's private governance has long been unable to address the question of how to deal with double claiming and the claims companies should be allowed to make. In this situation, signals from international policy and regulation under national policy point the way forward for the VCM. By moving from offsetting toward a contribution claim model, the VCM may overcome its “identity crisis” and find a new place within the broader climate change regime.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation &gt; Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; Private Governance of Climate Change</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward global net zero: The voluntary carbon market on its quest to find its place in the post‐Paris climate regime\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Kreibich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcc.892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This focus article traces the evolution of the voluntary carbon market (VCM), putting emphasis on the more recent developments following the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015. It focuses on the interplay between the privately governed VCM and the global climate regime under the United Nations (UN). For years, the VCM and the UN carbon market operated in parallel and mutually influenced each other. The adoption of the Paris Agreement, however, marked a turning point for the VCM. It triggered the proliferation of net zero targets, sparking the interest in the VCM as a supplier of carbon credits to offset companies' remaining emissions. At the same time, the global scope and ambitious targets set by the agreement have put the future of the VCM in limbo, raising concerns about double claiming and more generally, questioning the adequacy of offsetting. Considering these challenges, numerous stakeholders have started a process to redefine the rules of the market to ensure its credibility and legitimacy. While some areas of convergence were identified, the VCM's private governance has long been unable to address the question of how to deal with double claiming and the claims companies should be allowed to make. In this situation, signals from international policy and regulation under national policy point the way forward for the VCM. By moving from offsetting toward a contribution claim model, the VCM may overcome its “identity crisis” and find a new place within the broader climate change regime.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\\\"simple\\\"> <jats:list-item>The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation &gt; Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; Private Governance of Climate Change</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Climate Change\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇重点文章追溯了自愿碳市场(VCM)的演变过程,重点关注 2015 年《巴黎协定》通过后的最新发展。文章重点关注由私人管理的自愿碳市场与联合国(UN)下的全球气候机制之间的相互作用。多年来,自愿碳市场和联合国碳市场并行运作,相互影响。然而,《巴黎协定》的通过标志着自愿碳市场的转折点。它引发了净零目标的激增,激发了人们对作为碳信用额供应商的虚拟货币市场的兴趣,以抵消公司的剩余排放量。与此同时,该协议所设定的全球范围和雄心勃勃的目标使《自愿碳管理协议》的未来陷入困境,引发了对双重索赔的担忧,更普遍的是,对抵消的充分性提出了质疑。考虑到这些挑战,许多利益相关方已开始重新定义市场规则,以确保其可信度和合法性。虽然确定了一些趋同的领域,但《维也纳公约》的私人治理长期以来一直无法解决如何处理双重索赔以及应允许公司提出索赔的问题。在这种情况下,来自国际政策和国家政策监管的信号为《维也纳公约》指明了前进的方向。通过从抵消向贡献索赔模式的转变,自愿碳市场可能会克服其 "身份危机",并在更广泛的气候变化制度中找到新的位置:碳经济与气候减缓 > 政策、工具、生活方式、行为 政策与治理 > 多层次与跨国气候变化治理 政策与治理 > 气候变化的私人治理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward global net zero: The voluntary carbon market on its quest to find its place in the post‐Paris climate regime
This focus article traces the evolution of the voluntary carbon market (VCM), putting emphasis on the more recent developments following the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015. It focuses on the interplay between the privately governed VCM and the global climate regime under the United Nations (UN). For years, the VCM and the UN carbon market operated in parallel and mutually influenced each other. The adoption of the Paris Agreement, however, marked a turning point for the VCM. It triggered the proliferation of net zero targets, sparking the interest in the VCM as a supplier of carbon credits to offset companies' remaining emissions. At the same time, the global scope and ambitious targets set by the agreement have put the future of the VCM in limbo, raising concerns about double claiming and more generally, questioning the adequacy of offsetting. Considering these challenges, numerous stakeholders have started a process to redefine the rules of the market to ensure its credibility and legitimacy. While some areas of convergence were identified, the VCM's private governance has long been unable to address the question of how to deal with double claiming and the claims companies should be allowed to make. In this situation, signals from international policy and regulation under national policy point the way forward for the VCM. By moving from offsetting toward a contribution claim model, the VCM may overcome its “identity crisis” and find a new place within the broader climate change regime.This article is categorized under: The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance Policy and Governance > Private Governance of Climate Change
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信