用集合理论中介模型研究技术创新和创业的复杂因果过程

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yunzhou Du , Qiuchen Liu , Phillip H. Kim , Johannes Meuer
{"title":"用集合理论中介模型研究技术创新和创业的复杂因果过程","authors":"Yunzhou Du ,&nbsp;Qiuchen Liu ,&nbsp;Phillip H. Kim ,&nbsp;Johannes Meuer","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers often turn to linear mediation models to understand the complex causal processes inherent within innovation and entrepreneurship phenomena. However, these models are not always the most appropriate methods for increasing our understanding of these phenomena. This is because linear models depend on the principle of reductionism – which separates causal processes into their independent components – and overlooks systemwide attributes. To advance research findings that do not adequately address complex causal processes, we advocate using set-theoretic mediation models that offer analytical features better suited for holistically uncovering interdependent and intervening pathways. This method enables investigating complex causal processes associated with the conjunction, equifinality, and asymmetry that can occur with multiple interdependent variables. We provide researchers with practical guidance on constructing and testing set-theoretic mediation models using widely available software while demonstrating these procedures with an illustrative analysis. In doing so, we seek to guide researchers interested in integrating these models into their studies and recommend best practices for implementation. We argue that set-theoretic meditation models can be utilized in various contexts, as they offer new research opportunities for exploring unified necessity and sufficiency relational systems in ways existing methods have yet to address.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 103015"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying complex causal processes in technological innovation and entrepreneurship with set-theoretic mediation models\",\"authors\":\"Yunzhou Du ,&nbsp;Qiuchen Liu ,&nbsp;Phillip H. Kim ,&nbsp;Johannes Meuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Researchers often turn to linear mediation models to understand the complex causal processes inherent within innovation and entrepreneurship phenomena. However, these models are not always the most appropriate methods for increasing our understanding of these phenomena. This is because linear models depend on the principle of reductionism – which separates causal processes into their independent components – and overlooks systemwide attributes. To advance research findings that do not adequately address complex causal processes, we advocate using set-theoretic mediation models that offer analytical features better suited for holistically uncovering interdependent and intervening pathways. This method enables investigating complex causal processes associated with the conjunction, equifinality, and asymmetry that can occur with multiple interdependent variables. We provide researchers with practical guidance on constructing and testing set-theoretic mediation models using widely available software while demonstrating these procedures with an illustrative analysis. In doing so, we seek to guide researchers interested in integrating these models into their studies and recommend best practices for implementation. We argue that set-theoretic meditation models can be utilized in various contexts, as they offer new research opportunities for exploring unified necessity and sufficiency relational systems in ways existing methods have yet to address.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员常常求助于线性中介模型来理解创新和创业现象中固有的复杂因果过程。然而,这些模型并不总是加深我们对这些现象理解的最合适方法。这是因为线性模型依赖于还原论原则--该原则将因果过程分离为独立的组成部分--而忽略了整个系统的属性。为了推进那些不能充分解决复杂因果过程的研究成果,我们提倡使用集合理论中介模型,这种模型的分析特点更适合于从整体上揭示相互依存和相互影响的途径。这种方法可以研究与多个相互依存变量的连带性、等价性和不对称性相关的复杂因果过程。我们为研究人员提供了使用广泛可用的软件构建和测试集合理论中介模型的实用指导,同时通过实例分析展示了这些程序。在此过程中,我们试图指导有兴趣将这些模型纳入其研究的研究人员,并推荐实施的最佳实践。我们认为,集合理论中介模型可以在各种情况下使用,因为它们为探索统一的必要性和充分性关系系统提供了新的研究机会,而现有的方法还无法解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying complex causal processes in technological innovation and entrepreneurship with set-theoretic mediation models

Researchers often turn to linear mediation models to understand the complex causal processes inherent within innovation and entrepreneurship phenomena. However, these models are not always the most appropriate methods for increasing our understanding of these phenomena. This is because linear models depend on the principle of reductionism – which separates causal processes into their independent components – and overlooks systemwide attributes. To advance research findings that do not adequately address complex causal processes, we advocate using set-theoretic mediation models that offer analytical features better suited for holistically uncovering interdependent and intervening pathways. This method enables investigating complex causal processes associated with the conjunction, equifinality, and asymmetry that can occur with multiple interdependent variables. We provide researchers with practical guidance on constructing and testing set-theoretic mediation models using widely available software while demonstrating these procedures with an illustrative analysis. In doing so, we seek to guide researchers interested in integrating these models into their studies and recommend best practices for implementation. We argue that set-theoretic meditation models can be utilized in various contexts, as they offer new research opportunities for exploring unified necessity and sufficiency relational systems in ways existing methods have yet to address.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信