{"title":"带土工复合材料侧排水沟的土工合成材料加固土墙的吸湿机制和模量现场评估","authors":"Susit Chaiprakaikeow , Apiniti Jotisankasa , Washirawat Praphatsorn , Avishek Shrestha , Sawek Cheento , Sony Pramusandi , Pragith Chaisri , Shinya Inazumi","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls built on hillslopes are more increasingly incorporated with geo-composite side drain in order to prevent the side-seepage entering the fill. This study evaluates the long-term moisture, pore-water pressure, and shear modulus, of a 6.5 m-high geogrid-reinforced soil wall in western Thailand. Through extensive field monitoring and in-situ spectral analysis of surface wave (SASW) tests, conducted during the Years 2018–2019, as well as laboratory tests, several key findings emerge. Free-free resonant frequency (FFR) testing of non-reinforced samples reveals the role of soil wetting and drying history and hysteresis in the stiffness-moisture relationship. In-situ pore-water pressure was found to be highest below the road surface near the wall face, decreasing with depth due to underdrainage, with values ranging from −27 to 5 kPa. The intersection of the side drainage board with the underdrain bottom layer shows the highest water content. In-situ and laboratory-derived soil-water retention curve (SWRC) were found to differ at greater depths. In unsaturated conditions, the in-situ small strain modulus of GRS appeared insensitive to suction stress below 10 kPa but was slightly affected under positive pore-water pressure, with multiple linear regression modeling indicating a dependency of stiffness on depth and pore-water pressure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"52 5","pages":"Pages 860-873"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field evaluation of moisture-suction regime and modulus of geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall with geo-composite side-drain\",\"authors\":\"Susit Chaiprakaikeow , Apiniti Jotisankasa , Washirawat Praphatsorn , Avishek Shrestha , Sawek Cheento , Sony Pramusandi , Pragith Chaisri , Shinya Inazumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls built on hillslopes are more increasingly incorporated with geo-composite side drain in order to prevent the side-seepage entering the fill. This study evaluates the long-term moisture, pore-water pressure, and shear modulus, of a 6.5 m-high geogrid-reinforced soil wall in western Thailand. Through extensive field monitoring and in-situ spectral analysis of surface wave (SASW) tests, conducted during the Years 2018–2019, as well as laboratory tests, several key findings emerge. Free-free resonant frequency (FFR) testing of non-reinforced samples reveals the role of soil wetting and drying history and hysteresis in the stiffness-moisture relationship. In-situ pore-water pressure was found to be highest below the road surface near the wall face, decreasing with depth due to underdrainage, with values ranging from −27 to 5 kPa. The intersection of the side drainage board with the underdrain bottom layer shows the highest water content. In-situ and laboratory-derived soil-water retention curve (SWRC) were found to differ at greater depths. In unsaturated conditions, the in-situ small strain modulus of GRS appeared insensitive to suction stress below 10 kPa but was slightly affected under positive pore-water pressure, with multiple linear regression modeling indicating a dependency of stiffness on depth and pore-water pressure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 860-873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000475\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Field evaluation of moisture-suction regime and modulus of geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall with geo-composite side-drain
Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls built on hillslopes are more increasingly incorporated with geo-composite side drain in order to prevent the side-seepage entering the fill. This study evaluates the long-term moisture, pore-water pressure, and shear modulus, of a 6.5 m-high geogrid-reinforced soil wall in western Thailand. Through extensive field monitoring and in-situ spectral analysis of surface wave (SASW) tests, conducted during the Years 2018–2019, as well as laboratory tests, several key findings emerge. Free-free resonant frequency (FFR) testing of non-reinforced samples reveals the role of soil wetting and drying history and hysteresis in the stiffness-moisture relationship. In-situ pore-water pressure was found to be highest below the road surface near the wall face, decreasing with depth due to underdrainage, with values ranging from −27 to 5 kPa. The intersection of the side drainage board with the underdrain bottom layer shows the highest water content. In-situ and laboratory-derived soil-water retention curve (SWRC) were found to differ at greater depths. In unsaturated conditions, the in-situ small strain modulus of GRS appeared insensitive to suction stress below 10 kPa but was slightly affected under positive pore-water pressure, with multiple linear regression modeling indicating a dependency of stiffness on depth and pore-water pressure.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.