全科医生对下呼吸道感染实施肺部超声波检查:一项可行性研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Félix Amiot, Thomas Delomas, François-Xavier Laborne, Thomas Ecolivet, Richard Macrez, Axel Benhamed
{"title":"全科医生对下呼吸道感染实施肺部超声波检查:一项可行性研究。","authors":"Félix Amiot, Thomas Delomas, François-Xavier Laborne, Thomas Ecolivet, Richard Macrez, Axel Benhamed","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2343678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020).</p><p><strong>Settings and subjects: </strong>Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (<i>n</i> = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, <i>p</i> < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, <i>p</i> = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, <i>p</i> < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"463-470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Félix Amiot, Thomas Delomas, François-Xavier Laborne, Thomas Ecolivet, Richard Macrez, Axel Benhamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02813432.2024.2343678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020).</p><p><strong>Settings and subjects: </strong>Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (<i>n</i> = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, <i>p</i> < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, <i>p</i> = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, <i>p</i> < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"463-470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2343678\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2343678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估新手用户的全科医生(GPs)在初级医疗机构诊断下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)的可行性:前瞻性多中心干预研究(2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 3 月):设置和受试者:年龄大于3个月,在法国三个不同的全科医生诊所(农村、半农村和城市)就诊的疑似LRTI患者:全科医生进行 LUS 检查的可行性通过以下方面进行评估:(1) 未进行 LUS 检查的患者比例;(2) 技术故障;(3) 全科医生对图像的解读能力;(4) 检查持续时间;(5) 患者的看法和接受程度:共招募了 151 名患者,全科医生为 111 名(73.5%)患者(LUS 组)进行了 LUS 检查。在99.1%(n = 110)的病例中,全科医生表示他们能够解读图像。检查时间的中位数[IQR]为4[3-5]分钟。LUS组和未LUS组分别有70.3%和60%的患者被诊断为LRTI(P = .43)。LUS 后,全科医生将 6 例患者的诊断从 "其他 "改为 "LRTI"(+5.4%,P = .164),并为 10 例患者补充了胸部影像学检查(+9%,P 结论:全科医生使用手持式 LUS 进行 LUS 检查时,其诊断从 "其他 "改为 "LRTI":全科医生使用手持设备进行 LUS 是初级医疗保健中针对 LRTI 症状的一种可行的诊断工具,其有效性和患者接受度都很高:试验注册号:Clinicaltrial.gov:NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings.

Design: A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020).

Settings and subjects: Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France.

Main outcome measures: Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability.

Results: A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS.

Conclusions: LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception.

Trial registration number: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信