利用数字化提供的整体 "术前路径",优化关节置换手术的护理和选择。

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Eleanor R Bills, Anastasia Dimopoulos, Anne Lj Burke, Kathryn L Collins, Ecushla C Linedale, Vicki Hume, Jackie Yeoh, Sharyn Coles, Mandy Nolan, Kate Southam, Lesley Thomas, Melanie Ramsey, Jane M Andrews
{"title":"利用数字化提供的整体 \"术前路径\",优化关节置换手术的护理和选择。","authors":"Eleanor R Bills, Anastasia Dimopoulos, Anne Lj Burke, Kathryn L Collins, Ecushla C Linedale, Vicki Hume, Jackie Yeoh, Sharyn Coles, Mandy Nolan, Kate Southam, Lesley Thomas, Melanie Ramsey, Jane M Andrews","doi":"10.1177/10225536241234032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the implementation and evaluation of a hospital-initiated, community-based, digital prehabilitation program (<i>My PreHab Program</i>: MPP<i>)</i> for adults referred for elective joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPP was implemented July 2022 and comprises a personalised digital health screen that guides the provision of self-management resources. Adults (<u>></u>18 years) referred and accepted, or already waitlisted, for total knee/hip replacement surgery were eligible. Individuals requiring category 1 (urgent) or emergency surgery and those without a mobile phone were excluded. Implementation and intervention outcome measures (program adoption, equity of reach, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, engagement, preliminary surgical outcomes) were explored via study-specific measures and hospital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those invited (<i>N</i> = 689), 77.8% participated. Participants and non-participants were similar in key demographic variables except regional invitees were more likely to participate than metropolitan (88.0% vs 75.4%, <i>p</i> = .002) and non-participants tended to be older (median age = 69.0 vs 64.0, <i>p</i> = .005). Participants reported on average four modifiable risk factors: most commonly chronic pain (79.1%), obesity (57.3%), and frailty (40.9%). Most participants (80.4%) reviewed all resources provided and reported action/intention to address issues identified (90.9%). Participants perceived MPP as acceptable (3.2/5), appropriate (3.3/5), and feasible (3.4/5). Early trends for participants progressing to surgery (<i>n</i> = 33) show a reduced length of stay (MPP = 4.3, baseline = 5.3 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MPP demonstrated high adoption, fidelity, and participant engagement. It is acceptable, appropriate and feasible and has the potential to be scaled-up digitally at low-cost. Modifiable risk factors were prevalent and early indications suggest this preoperative intervention may benefit both patients and the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 2","pages":"10225536241234032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities to optimise care and choice in joint replacement surgery using a digitally delivered, holistic PreHab pathway.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor R Bills, Anastasia Dimopoulos, Anne Lj Burke, Kathryn L Collins, Ecushla C Linedale, Vicki Hume, Jackie Yeoh, Sharyn Coles, Mandy Nolan, Kate Southam, Lesley Thomas, Melanie Ramsey, Jane M Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536241234032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the implementation and evaluation of a hospital-initiated, community-based, digital prehabilitation program (<i>My PreHab Program</i>: MPP<i>)</i> for adults referred for elective joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPP was implemented July 2022 and comprises a personalised digital health screen that guides the provision of self-management resources. Adults (<u>></u>18 years) referred and accepted, or already waitlisted, for total knee/hip replacement surgery were eligible. Individuals requiring category 1 (urgent) or emergency surgery and those without a mobile phone were excluded. Implementation and intervention outcome measures (program adoption, equity of reach, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, engagement, preliminary surgical outcomes) were explored via study-specific measures and hospital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those invited (<i>N</i> = 689), 77.8% participated. Participants and non-participants were similar in key demographic variables except regional invitees were more likely to participate than metropolitan (88.0% vs 75.4%, <i>p</i> = .002) and non-participants tended to be older (median age = 69.0 vs 64.0, <i>p</i> = .005). Participants reported on average four modifiable risk factors: most commonly chronic pain (79.1%), obesity (57.3%), and frailty (40.9%). Most participants (80.4%) reviewed all resources provided and reported action/intention to address issues identified (90.9%). Participants perceived MPP as acceptable (3.2/5), appropriate (3.3/5), and feasible (3.4/5). Early trends for participants progressing to surgery (<i>n</i> = 33) show a reduced length of stay (MPP = 4.3, baseline = 5.3 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MPP demonstrated high adoption, fidelity, and participant engagement. It is acceptable, appropriate and feasible and has the potential to be scaled-up digitally at low-cost. Modifiable risk factors were prevalent and early indications suggest this preoperative intervention may benefit both patients and the healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"10225536241234032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241234032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241234032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述一项由医院发起、基于社区的数字化预康复计划(My PreHab Program:MPP)的实施和评估情况,该计划面向转诊接受择期关节置换术的成人:MPP于2022年7月开始实施,包括一个个性化的数字健康筛查,指导提供自我管理资源。转诊并接受或已在等待名单上的全膝关节/髋关节置换手术的成人(18 岁以上)均符合条件。需要进行1类(紧急)或急诊手术的患者以及没有手机的患者除外。研究人员通过特定的研究措施和医院记录对实施和干预结果(计划采用率、覆盖公平性、忠实性、可接受性、适宜性、可行性、参与度、初步手术结果)进行了探讨:在受邀者(N = 689)中,77.8% 的人参与了研究。除了地区受邀者比城市受邀者更有可能参与(88.0% vs 75.4%,p = .002)和非参与者年龄偏大(中位年龄 = 69.0 vs 64.0,p = .005)外,参与者和非参与者的主要人口统计学变量相似。参与者平均报告了四种可改变的风险因素:最常见的是慢性疼痛(79.1%)、肥胖(57.3%)和体弱(40.9%)。大多数参与者(80.4%)查看了所有提供的资源,并报告了解决所发现问题的行动/意向(90.9%)。参与者认为 MPP 是可接受的(3.2/5)、适当的(3.3/5)和可行的(3.4/5)。进入手术阶段的参与者(33 人)的早期趋势显示,住院时间缩短了(MPP = 4.3 天,基线 = 5.3 天):结论:MPP 的采用率、忠实度和参与者参与度都很高。结论:MPP 的采用率、忠实度和参与者的参与度都很高,是可接受的、适当的和可行的,并有可能以低成本的方式扩大数字化规模。可改变的风险因素普遍存在,早期迹象表明,这种术前干预可能对患者和医疗保健系统都有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opportunities to optimise care and choice in joint replacement surgery using a digitally delivered, holistic PreHab pathway.

Purpose: To describe the implementation and evaluation of a hospital-initiated, community-based, digital prehabilitation program (My PreHab Program: MPP) for adults referred for elective joint replacement.

Methods: MPP was implemented July 2022 and comprises a personalised digital health screen that guides the provision of self-management resources. Adults (>18 years) referred and accepted, or already waitlisted, for total knee/hip replacement surgery were eligible. Individuals requiring category 1 (urgent) or emergency surgery and those without a mobile phone were excluded. Implementation and intervention outcome measures (program adoption, equity of reach, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, engagement, preliminary surgical outcomes) were explored via study-specific measures and hospital records.

Results: Of those invited (N = 689), 77.8% participated. Participants and non-participants were similar in key demographic variables except regional invitees were more likely to participate than metropolitan (88.0% vs 75.4%, p = .002) and non-participants tended to be older (median age = 69.0 vs 64.0, p = .005). Participants reported on average four modifiable risk factors: most commonly chronic pain (79.1%), obesity (57.3%), and frailty (40.9%). Most participants (80.4%) reviewed all resources provided and reported action/intention to address issues identified (90.9%). Participants perceived MPP as acceptable (3.2/5), appropriate (3.3/5), and feasible (3.4/5). Early trends for participants progressing to surgery (n = 33) show a reduced length of stay (MPP = 4.3, baseline = 5.3 days).

Conclusion: MPP demonstrated high adoption, fidelity, and participant engagement. It is acceptable, appropriate and feasible and has the potential to be scaled-up digitally at low-cost. Modifiable risk factors were prevalent and early indications suggest this preoperative intervention may benefit both patients and the healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信