Rui Ping Meng, Bao Bao Huang, Yan Ling Wei, Lin Lyu, Huan Yang, Cheng Liu, Hong Li Zhou, Xi Ping Liao, Jian Yun Zhou, Xia Xie
{"title":"维多珠单抗和英夫利西单抗对中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者的有效性和安全性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Rui Ping Meng, Bao Bao Huang, Yan Ling Wei, Lin Lyu, Huan Yang, Cheng Liu, Hong Li Zhou, Xi Ping Liao, Jian Yun Zhou, Xia Xie","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.13270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated with IFX or VDZ for at least 14 weeks at three tertiary hospitals in southwest China between January 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Efficacy of the biologics was evaluated based on the steroid-free clinical remission rate, clinical remission rate, and mucosal healing rate at Weeks 14 and 52. Adverse events related to biologic use were recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Altogether 122 biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included. No marked differences in the steroid-free clinical remission rate and clinical remission rate were observed between the two groups at Week 14 or Week 52 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The VDZ group exhibited a higher mucosal healing rate at Week 14 compared to the IFX group (33.3% vs 16.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.036), while that at Week 52 did not differ between the two groups (65.6% vs 47.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.098). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.071).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>VDZ and IFX showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles and can be used as viable first-line therapeutic options for biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"25 4","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Rui Ping Meng, Bao Bao Huang, Yan Ling Wei, Lin Lyu, Huan Yang, Cheng Liu, Hong Li Zhou, Xi Ping Liao, Jian Yun Zhou, Xia Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1751-2980.13270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated with IFX or VDZ for at least 14 weeks at three tertiary hospitals in southwest China between January 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Efficacy of the biologics was evaluated based on the steroid-free clinical remission rate, clinical remission rate, and mucosal healing rate at Weeks 14 and 52. Adverse events related to biologic use were recorded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Altogether 122 biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included. No marked differences in the steroid-free clinical remission rate and clinical remission rate were observed between the two groups at Week 14 or Week 52 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The VDZ group exhibited a higher mucosal healing rate at Week 14 compared to the IFX group (33.3% vs 16.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.036), while that at Week 52 did not differ between the two groups (65.6% vs 47.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.098). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.071).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>VDZ and IFX showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles and can be used as viable first-line therapeutic options for biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"230-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.13270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.13270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的我们开展了这项多中心、回顾性队列研究,旨在评估维多珠单抗(VDZ)和英夫利昔单抗(IFX)对生物制剂无效的中重度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的有效性和安全性:回顾性纳入2021年1月至2023年1月期间在中国西南地区三家三甲医院接受IFX或VDZ治疗至少14周的中重度UC患者。根据第14周和第52周的无类固醇临床缓解率、临床缓解率和粘膜愈合率评估生物制剂的疗效。记录了与使用生物制剂相关的不良事件:结果:共纳入了122例未经生物制剂治疗的中重度UC患者。在第14周或第52周,两组患者的无类固醇临床缓解率和临床缓解率无明显差异(P>0.05)。与IFX组相比,VDZ组在第14周的粘膜愈合率更高(33.3% vs 16.9%,P = 0.036),而在第52周,两组的粘膜愈合率没有差异(65.6% vs 47.1%,P = 0.098)。两组的不良反应发生率无统计学差异(P = 0.071):结论:VDZ和IFX显示出相似的临床疗效和安全性,可作为中度至重度UC患者的一线治疗选择。
Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study
Objectives
We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods
Biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated with IFX or VDZ for at least 14 weeks at three tertiary hospitals in southwest China between January 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Efficacy of the biologics was evaluated based on the steroid-free clinical remission rate, clinical remission rate, and mucosal healing rate at Weeks 14 and 52. Adverse events related to biologic use were recorded.
Results
Altogether 122 biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included. No marked differences in the steroid-free clinical remission rate and clinical remission rate were observed between the two groups at Week 14 or Week 52 (P > 0.05). The VDZ group exhibited a higher mucosal healing rate at Week 14 compared to the IFX group (33.3% vs 16.9%, P = 0.036), while that at Week 52 did not differ between the two groups (65.6% vs 47.1%, P = 0.098). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups (P = 0.071).
Conclusion
VDZ and IFX showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles and can be used as viable first-line therapeutic options for biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.