膝关节骨性关节炎患者使用家用足穿装置治疗后医疗资源利用的减少:回顾性索赔分析

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-05-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.117155
Josh Mark, Shirley Shema-Shiratzky, Joel Sommer, Tim Nolan, Ganit Segal
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎患者使用家用足穿装置治疗后医疗资源利用的减少:回顾性索赔分析","authors":"Josh Mark, Shirley Shema-Shiratzky, Joel Sommer, Tim Nolan, Ganit Segal","doi":"10.36469/001c.117155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> One in 7 US adults has knee osteoarthritis (OA) and almost two-thirds of them suffer from low back pain. OA is the third most rapidly rising condition associated with disability and leads to a significant burden on the healthcare system and society. <b>Objective:</b> This study looked at the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with knee OA and low back pain before and after the utilization of a new, home-based, noninvasive, biomechanical intervention. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective claims analysis of 585 patients treated with a personalized, noninvasive, home-based, biomechanical treatment that aims to alleviate knee pain and improve function (AposHealth®). The date of the first AposHealth claim was the index date. Data prior to the index date and post-index date were used to monitor changes in HCRU while in treatment. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means and standard deviations, were used to present patient characteristics. To standardize the results, an average monthly claims data rate was calculated and an expected annual rate was extrapolated. Annual HCRU rate per 1000 members was calculated. <b>Results:</b> HCRU decreased after utilizing the new intervention including a decrease of 79% in diagnostic claims, a 70% decrease in outpatient services, a 22% decrease in non-operative treatments, a 61% decrease in pain medications including an 85% drop in opioids use, and a 44% decrease in intra-articular injections. The pre-index estimated rate for total knee replacement (TKR), which is based on existing literature, was 15.1%, whereas the post-index rate of TKR was 0.9%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with knee OA treated with a home-based, noninvasive, biomechanical intervention incurred fewer healthcare resources, leading to an overall reduction in the cost of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction in Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Treatment With a Home-Based Footworn Device in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Josh Mark, Shirley Shema-Shiratzky, Joel Sommer, Tim Nolan, Ganit Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.36469/001c.117155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> One in 7 US adults has knee osteoarthritis (OA) and almost two-thirds of them suffer from low back pain. OA is the third most rapidly rising condition associated with disability and leads to a significant burden on the healthcare system and society. <b>Objective:</b> This study looked at the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with knee OA and low back pain before and after the utilization of a new, home-based, noninvasive, biomechanical intervention. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective claims analysis of 585 patients treated with a personalized, noninvasive, home-based, biomechanical treatment that aims to alleviate knee pain and improve function (AposHealth®). The date of the first AposHealth claim was the index date. Data prior to the index date and post-index date were used to monitor changes in HCRU while in treatment. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means and standard deviations, were used to present patient characteristics. To standardize the results, an average monthly claims data rate was calculated and an expected annual rate was extrapolated. Annual HCRU rate per 1000 members was calculated. <b>Results:</b> HCRU decreased after utilizing the new intervention including a decrease of 79% in diagnostic claims, a 70% decrease in outpatient services, a 22% decrease in non-operative treatments, a 61% decrease in pain medications including an 85% drop in opioids use, and a 44% decrease in intra-articular injections. The pre-index estimated rate for total knee replacement (TKR), which is based on existing literature, was 15.1%, whereas the post-index rate of TKR was 0.9%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with knee OA treated with a home-based, noninvasive, biomechanical intervention incurred fewer healthcare resources, leading to an overall reduction in the cost of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102045/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.117155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.117155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:每 7 个美国成年人中就有 1 人患有膝关节骨关节炎(OA),其中近三分之二的人患有腰背痛。膝关节骨性关节炎是第三大急剧上升的致残疾病,给医疗保健系统和社会造成了沉重负担。研究目的本研究调查了膝关节 OA 和腰背痛患者在使用一种新的、基于家庭的非侵入性生物力学干预措施前后的医疗资源利用率(HCRU)。方法:这是对 585 名患者进行的回顾性索赔分析,这些患者接受了旨在缓解膝关节疼痛和改善功能的个性化、非侵入性、家庭式生物力学治疗(AposHealth®)。首次 AposHealth 索赔日期为索引日期。指数日期之前和指数日期之后的数据用于监测治疗期间 HCRU 的变化。描述性统计(包括频率、平均值和标准差)用于显示患者特征。为使结果标准化,计算了平均每月报销数据率,并推断出预期年报销率。计算出每 1000 名成员的年度 HCRU 率。结果:采用新的干预措施后,HCRU 有所下降,其中诊断索赔下降了 79%,门诊服务下降了 70%,非手术治疗下降了 22%,止痛药物下降了 61%,其中阿片类药物的使用下降了 85%,关节内注射下降了 44%。根据现有文献,索引前的全膝关节置换术(TKR)估计率为 15.1%,而索引后的全膝关节置换术率为 0.9%。结论膝关节 OA 患者在接受基于家庭的非侵入性生物力学干预治疗后,花费的医疗资源更少,从而降低了总体医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction in Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Treatment With a Home-Based Footworn Device in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.

Background: One in 7 US adults has knee osteoarthritis (OA) and almost two-thirds of them suffer from low back pain. OA is the third most rapidly rising condition associated with disability and leads to a significant burden on the healthcare system and society. Objective: This study looked at the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with knee OA and low back pain before and after the utilization of a new, home-based, noninvasive, biomechanical intervention. Methods: This was a retrospective claims analysis of 585 patients treated with a personalized, noninvasive, home-based, biomechanical treatment that aims to alleviate knee pain and improve function (AposHealth®). The date of the first AposHealth claim was the index date. Data prior to the index date and post-index date were used to monitor changes in HCRU while in treatment. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means and standard deviations, were used to present patient characteristics. To standardize the results, an average monthly claims data rate was calculated and an expected annual rate was extrapolated. Annual HCRU rate per 1000 members was calculated. Results: HCRU decreased after utilizing the new intervention including a decrease of 79% in diagnostic claims, a 70% decrease in outpatient services, a 22% decrease in non-operative treatments, a 61% decrease in pain medications including an 85% drop in opioids use, and a 44% decrease in intra-articular injections. The pre-index estimated rate for total knee replacement (TKR), which is based on existing literature, was 15.1%, whereas the post-index rate of TKR was 0.9%. Conclusions: Patients with knee OA treated with a home-based, noninvasive, biomechanical intervention incurred fewer healthcare resources, leading to an overall reduction in the cost of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信