使用超声引导进行颈内静脉插管与锁骨上脑静脉插管的比较

Zulfiqar Ali, Abdul Waheed Mir, Iqra Nazir, Sajad Hussain Arif, Altaf Mir, Mir Mohsin, Zoya Sehar, Shahid Ahmad Mir
{"title":"使用超声引导进行颈内静脉插管与锁骨上脑静脉插管的比较","authors":"Zulfiqar Ali, Abdul Waheed Mir, Iqra Nazir, Sajad Hussain Arif, Altaf Mir, Mir Mohsin, Zoya Sehar, Shahid Ahmad Mir","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i5.64139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ultrasound has become the standard of care for the insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) in the intensive care unit. With the introduction of ultrasonography in CVC insertion, there has been an improvement in the success rate and a dramatic decrease in the rate of complications.\nAims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and ease of insertion of ultrasonically guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) with that of the supraclavicular subclavian vein (SCV) in adult patients undergoing various surgical procedures.\nMaterials and Methods: All the patients in whom central venous cannulation was planned were assigned to two groups. Group I underwent ultrasound-guided IJV while as Group II underwent cannulation ultrasound-guided SCV cannulation. A comparison was made between the two groups, of the success rates, durations of procedure, number of attempts at needle redirections, difficulties if any during insertion of guidewires, and the complications encountered.\nResults: The IJV group had a higher proportion of first-attempt success (93.2% versus 62.7%). The IJV group had a lesser incidence (3.2%) of complications such as guidewire progression and needle redirections compared with SCV (15.2%). The frequency of adverse events did not differ between the two study groups with an incidence in 3.2% in IJV group and 9.6% in the subclavian group. Higher first-attempt success rates and fewer procedural complications were seen with ultrasound-guided IJV.\nConclusion: IJV central venous catheterization is an easier and less invasive and less risky procedure for patients.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of internal jugular vein cannulation versus supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein cannulation using ultrasound guidance\",\"authors\":\"Zulfiqar Ali, Abdul Waheed Mir, Iqra Nazir, Sajad Hussain Arif, Altaf Mir, Mir Mohsin, Zoya Sehar, Shahid Ahmad Mir\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/ajms.v15i5.64139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ultrasound has become the standard of care for the insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) in the intensive care unit. With the introduction of ultrasonography in CVC insertion, there has been an improvement in the success rate and a dramatic decrease in the rate of complications.\\nAims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and ease of insertion of ultrasonically guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) with that of the supraclavicular subclavian vein (SCV) in adult patients undergoing various surgical procedures.\\nMaterials and Methods: All the patients in whom central venous cannulation was planned were assigned to two groups. Group I underwent ultrasound-guided IJV while as Group II underwent cannulation ultrasound-guided SCV cannulation. A comparison was made between the two groups, of the success rates, durations of procedure, number of attempts at needle redirections, difficulties if any during insertion of guidewires, and the complications encountered.\\nResults: The IJV group had a higher proportion of first-attempt success (93.2% versus 62.7%). The IJV group had a lesser incidence (3.2%) of complications such as guidewire progression and needle redirections compared with SCV (15.2%). The frequency of adverse events did not differ between the two study groups with an incidence in 3.2% in IJV group and 9.6% in the subclavian group. Higher first-attempt success rates and fewer procedural complications were seen with ultrasound-guided IJV.\\nConclusion: IJV central venous catheterization is an easier and less invasive and less risky procedure for patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i5.64139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i5.64139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声已成为重症监护病房插入中心静脉导管(CVC)的标准护理方法。随着在插入 CVC 时引入超声波检查,成功率有所提高,并发症的发生率也大幅下降:本研究旨在比较在超声引导下插入颈内静脉(IJV)和锁骨上锁骨下静脉(SCV)的安全性和简便性,适用于接受各种外科手术的成年患者:将所有计划进行中心静脉插管的患者分为两组。第一组在超声引导下进行 IJV 插管,第二组在超声引导下进行 SCV 插管。对两组的成功率、手术持续时间、针头重定向的尝试次数、导丝插入过程中的困难以及遇到的并发症进行了比较:结果:IJV 组首次尝试成功的比例更高(93.2% 对 62.7%)。与 SCV(15.2%)相比,IJV 组的导丝前移和针头重定向等并发症发生率较低(3.2%)。不良事件的发生率在两个研究组之间没有差异,IJV 组为 3.2%,锁骨下组为 9.6%。超声引导 IJV 首次尝试成功率更高,手术并发症更少:结论:对患者来说,IJV 中心静脉导管植入术是一种更简单、创伤更小、风险更低的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of internal jugular vein cannulation versus supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein cannulation using ultrasound guidance
Background: Ultrasound has become the standard of care for the insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) in the intensive care unit. With the introduction of ultrasonography in CVC insertion, there has been an improvement in the success rate and a dramatic decrease in the rate of complications. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and ease of insertion of ultrasonically guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) with that of the supraclavicular subclavian vein (SCV) in adult patients undergoing various surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: All the patients in whom central venous cannulation was planned were assigned to two groups. Group I underwent ultrasound-guided IJV while as Group II underwent cannulation ultrasound-guided SCV cannulation. A comparison was made between the two groups, of the success rates, durations of procedure, number of attempts at needle redirections, difficulties if any during insertion of guidewires, and the complications encountered. Results: The IJV group had a higher proportion of first-attempt success (93.2% versus 62.7%). The IJV group had a lesser incidence (3.2%) of complications such as guidewire progression and needle redirections compared with SCV (15.2%). The frequency of adverse events did not differ between the two study groups with an incidence in 3.2% in IJV group and 9.6% in the subclavian group. Higher first-attempt success rates and fewer procedural complications were seen with ultrasound-guided IJV. Conclusion: IJV central venous catheterization is an easier and less invasive and less risky procedure for patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信