单层腰椎后路融合术术中预防性使用头孢唑啉与头孢唑啉联合妥布霉素或庆大霉素的比较

Meera M. Dhodapkar, Seongho Jeong, Scott J. Halperin, Daniel R. Rubio, Mengnai Li, Jonathan N. Grauer
{"title":"单层腰椎后路融合术术中预防性使用头孢唑啉与头孢唑啉联合妥布霉素或庆大霉素的比较","authors":"Meera M. Dhodapkar, Seongho Jeong, Scott J. Halperin, Daniel R. Rubio, Mengnai Li, Jonathan N. Grauer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a rare but serious complication of lumbar fusion. Determining an optimal antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to minimize its incidence is critical. Methods: Adult single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) patients were identified from the 2010 to October 2021 PearlDiver M157 database, excluding those with infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses in the 90 days preoperatively or inactivity in 90 days postoperatively. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using the Current Procedural Terminology J-codes. Two cohorts were created: (1) patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) patients who received cefazolin and either tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes and 2-year revision rates were assessed with univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI. Results: Of 8,161 PLF patients, 7,562 (92.7%) received cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and 599 (7.3%) received cefazolin and gentamicin/tobramycin. Antibiotic subgroups did not vary in age, sex, or ECI (P > 0.05 for all). On univariable and multivariable analyses, no 90-day outcomes, nor 2-year revision rates varied significantly between the antibiotic prophylaxis subgroups (P > 0.05 for all). Discussion: For single-level PLF, cefazolin alone versus cefazolin and gentamicin/tobramycin did not differ in rates of 90-day adverse outcomes or 2-year revisions.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"95 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cefazolin Alone Versus Cefazolin with Tobramycin or Gentamicin as Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion\",\"authors\":\"Meera M. Dhodapkar, Seongho Jeong, Scott J. Halperin, Daniel R. Rubio, Mengnai Li, Jonathan N. Grauer\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a rare but serious complication of lumbar fusion. Determining an optimal antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to minimize its incidence is critical. Methods: Adult single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) patients were identified from the 2010 to October 2021 PearlDiver M157 database, excluding those with infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses in the 90 days preoperatively or inactivity in 90 days postoperatively. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using the Current Procedural Terminology J-codes. Two cohorts were created: (1) patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) patients who received cefazolin and either tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes and 2-year revision rates were assessed with univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI. Results: Of 8,161 PLF patients, 7,562 (92.7%) received cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and 599 (7.3%) received cefazolin and gentamicin/tobramycin. Antibiotic subgroups did not vary in age, sex, or ECI (P > 0.05 for all). On univariable and multivariable analyses, no 90-day outcomes, nor 2-year revision rates varied significantly between the antibiotic prophylaxis subgroups (P > 0.05 for all). Discussion: For single-level PLF, cefazolin alone versus cefazolin and gentamicin/tobramycin did not differ in rates of 90-day adverse outcomes or 2-year revisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews\",\"volume\":\"95 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:手术部位感染(SSI)是腰椎融合术中一种罕见但严重的并发症。确定最佳的抗生素预防方案以尽量降低其发生率至关重要。方法:从 2010 年至 2021 年 10 月的 PearlDiver M157 数据库中识别成人单层后路腰椎融合术(PLF)患者,排除术前 90 天内有感染、肿瘤或外伤诊断或术后 90 天内无活动的患者。术中抗生素预防方案是根据当前程序术语 J 代码确定的。我们创建了两个队列:(1) 仅接受头孢唑啉治疗的患者;(2) 接受头孢唑啉和妥布霉素或庆大霉素治疗的患者。通过单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归评估了患者的年龄、性别、Elixhauser 综合征指数(ECI)、术后 90 天不良预后和 2 年翻修率的差异,并对患者的年龄、性别和 ECI 进行了控制。结果:在 8,161 例 PLF 患者中,7,562 例(92.7%)接受了头孢唑啉围手术期抗生素预防,599 例(7.3%)接受了头孢唑啉和庆大霉素/妥布霉素。抗生素亚组在年龄、性别或 ECI 方面没有差异(P > 0.05)。在单变量和多变量分析中,抗生素预防亚组之间的 90 天结果和 2 年翻修率均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。讨论对于单层 PLF,单用头孢唑啉与头孢唑啉和庆大霉素/妥布霉素在 90 天不良反应率或 2 年翻修率方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cefazolin Alone Versus Cefazolin with Tobramycin or Gentamicin as Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion
Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a rare but serious complication of lumbar fusion. Determining an optimal antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to minimize its incidence is critical. Methods: Adult single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) patients were identified from the 2010 to October 2021 PearlDiver M157 database, excluding those with infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses in the 90 days preoperatively or inactivity in 90 days postoperatively. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using the Current Procedural Terminology J-codes. Two cohorts were created: (1) patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) patients who received cefazolin and either tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes and 2-year revision rates were assessed with univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI. Results: Of 8,161 PLF patients, 7,562 (92.7%) received cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and 599 (7.3%) received cefazolin and gentamicin/tobramycin. Antibiotic subgroups did not vary in age, sex, or ECI (P > 0.05 for all). On univariable and multivariable analyses, no 90-day outcomes, nor 2-year revision rates varied significantly between the antibiotic prophylaxis subgroups (P > 0.05 for all). Discussion: For single-level PLF, cefazolin alone versus cefazolin and gentamicin/tobramycin did not differ in rates of 90-day adverse outcomes or 2-year revisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信