运动疗法对慢性腰背痛患者的最小价值效应:离散选择实验研究

Mr Harrison Hansford, Matthew D Jones, Aidan G. Cashin, R. Ostelo, Alessandro Chiarotto, Sam A. Williams, Saurab Sharma, Jack J. Devonshire, Michael C. Ferraro, M. Wewege, James H McAuley, John M Rose
{"title":"运动疗法对慢性腰背痛患者的最小价值效应:离散选择实验研究","authors":"Mr Harrison Hansford, Matthew D Jones, Aidan G. Cashin, R. Ostelo, Alessandro Chiarotto, Sam A. Williams, Saurab Sharma, Jack J. Devonshire, Michael C. Ferraro, M. Wewege, James H McAuley, John M Rose","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Understanding the magnitude of treatment effect patients need to see to consider a treatment worthwhile is of clear clinical and research importance. Current measures of clinical importance, such as the minimum clinical important difference, are limited as they are not determined by patients, and do not reflect specific costs, risks or inconveniences of individual treatments, i.e. you could have the same MCID for surgery as for exercise. We aimed to identify the smallest worthwhile effect (SWE), a new measure of clinical importance, of exercise therapy for people with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) using discrete choice experiment.\n \n \n \n The SWE was estimated as the lowest reduction in pain that participants would consider exercising worthwhile, compared to not exercising i.e., effects due to natural history and other components (e.g., regression to the mean). We recruited English-speaking adults in Australia with non-specific CLBP to our online survey via email from a registry of previous participants and advertisements on social media. We used discrete choice experiment to estimate the SWE of exercise compared to no exercise for pain intensity. We analysed the discrete choice experiment using a mixed logit model, and mitigated hypothetical bias through certainty calibration, with sensitivity analyses performed with different certainty calibration thresholds.\n \n \n \n 213 participants completed the survey. Mean age (±SD) was 50.7±16.5, median (IQR) pain duration 10 years (5-20), and mean pain intensity (±SD) was 5.8±2.3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. For people with CLBP the SWE of exercise was a between-group reduction in pain of 20%, compared to no exercise. This means, for a baseline pain of 5, the SWE would be a 1/10 between-group reduction in pain.\n \n \n \n This patient-informed threshold of clinical importance should guide the interpretation of findings from randomised trials and meta-analyses of exercise therapy compared to no exercise.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE SMALLEST WORTHWHILE EFFECT OF EXERCISE THERAPY FOR PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Mr Harrison Hansford, Matthew D Jones, Aidan G. Cashin, R. Ostelo, Alessandro Chiarotto, Sam A. Williams, Saurab Sharma, Jack J. Devonshire, Michael C. Ferraro, M. Wewege, James H McAuley, John M Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Understanding the magnitude of treatment effect patients need to see to consider a treatment worthwhile is of clear clinical and research importance. Current measures of clinical importance, such as the minimum clinical important difference, are limited as they are not determined by patients, and do not reflect specific costs, risks or inconveniences of individual treatments, i.e. you could have the same MCID for surgery as for exercise. We aimed to identify the smallest worthwhile effect (SWE), a new measure of clinical importance, of exercise therapy for people with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) using discrete choice experiment.\\n \\n \\n \\n The SWE was estimated as the lowest reduction in pain that participants would consider exercising worthwhile, compared to not exercising i.e., effects due to natural history and other components (e.g., regression to the mean). We recruited English-speaking adults in Australia with non-specific CLBP to our online survey via email from a registry of previous participants and advertisements on social media. We used discrete choice experiment to estimate the SWE of exercise compared to no exercise for pain intensity. We analysed the discrete choice experiment using a mixed logit model, and mitigated hypothetical bias through certainty calibration, with sensitivity analyses performed with different certainty calibration thresholds.\\n \\n \\n \\n 213 participants completed the survey. Mean age (±SD) was 50.7±16.5, median (IQR) pain duration 10 years (5-20), and mean pain intensity (±SD) was 5.8±2.3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. For people with CLBP the SWE of exercise was a between-group reduction in pain of 20%, compared to no exercise. This means, for a baseline pain of 5, the SWE would be a 1/10 between-group reduction in pain.\\n \\n \\n \\n This patient-informed threshold of clinical importance should guide the interpretation of findings from randomised trials and meta-analyses of exercise therapy compared to no exercise.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解患者需要看到多大的治疗效果才能认为治疗是值得的,这显然具有重要的临床和研究意义。目前对临床重要性的衡量标准(如最小临床重要差异)是有限的,因为它们不是由患者决定的,也不能反映个别治疗的具体成本、风险或不便之处,例如,手术和运动的最小临床重要差异可能是相同的。我们的目标是利用离散选择实验确定运动疗法对非特异性慢性腰背痛患者的最小值得效应(SWE),这是衡量临床重要性的新标准。 SWE被估算为与不运动相比,参与者认为值得运动的最低疼痛减轻程度,即自然史和其他因素(如向均值回归)导致的影响。我们通过先前参与者登记处的电子邮件和社交媒体上的广告,招募澳大利亚讲英语的非特异性慢性前列腺炎成人参与我们的在线调查。我们使用离散选择实验来估算运动与不运动相比对疼痛强度的影响。我们使用混合 Logit 模型对离散选择实验进行了分析,并通过确定性校准减轻了假设偏差,同时使用不同的确定性校准阈值进行了敏感性分析。 213 名参与者完成了调查。平均年龄(±SD)为 50.7±16.5,疼痛持续时间中位数(IQR)为 10 年(5-20),疼痛强度平均值(±SD)为 5.8±2.3(0-10 分)。与不运动相比,运动对慢性前列腺痛患者的SWE在组间减少了20%。这意味着,如果基线疼痛为 5,那么 SWE 就是组间疼痛减轻的 1/10。 在解释运动疗法与不运动疗法相比的随机试验和荟萃分析结果时,应以患者知情的这一临床重要性阈值为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE SMALLEST WORTHWHILE EFFECT OF EXERCISE THERAPY FOR PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT STUDY
Understanding the magnitude of treatment effect patients need to see to consider a treatment worthwhile is of clear clinical and research importance. Current measures of clinical importance, such as the minimum clinical important difference, are limited as they are not determined by patients, and do not reflect specific costs, risks or inconveniences of individual treatments, i.e. you could have the same MCID for surgery as for exercise. We aimed to identify the smallest worthwhile effect (SWE), a new measure of clinical importance, of exercise therapy for people with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) using discrete choice experiment. The SWE was estimated as the lowest reduction in pain that participants would consider exercising worthwhile, compared to not exercising i.e., effects due to natural history and other components (e.g., regression to the mean). We recruited English-speaking adults in Australia with non-specific CLBP to our online survey via email from a registry of previous participants and advertisements on social media. We used discrete choice experiment to estimate the SWE of exercise compared to no exercise for pain intensity. We analysed the discrete choice experiment using a mixed logit model, and mitigated hypothetical bias through certainty calibration, with sensitivity analyses performed with different certainty calibration thresholds. 213 participants completed the survey. Mean age (±SD) was 50.7±16.5, median (IQR) pain duration 10 years (5-20), and mean pain intensity (±SD) was 5.8±2.3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. For people with CLBP the SWE of exercise was a between-group reduction in pain of 20%, compared to no exercise. This means, for a baseline pain of 5, the SWE would be a 1/10 between-group reduction in pain. This patient-informed threshold of clinical importance should guide the interpretation of findings from randomised trials and meta-analyses of exercise therapy compared to no exercise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信