直播平台是否应该采用人工智能?销售工作视角

IF 5.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xiaoping Xu , Yuting Wang , T.C.E. Cheng , Tsan-Ming Choi
{"title":"直播平台是否应该采用人工智能?销售工作视角","authors":"Xiaoping Xu ,&nbsp;Yuting Wang ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng ,&nbsp;Tsan-Ming Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analytically investigate a supply chain (SC) that is composed of a manufacturer and a live broadcasting platform, and examine whether the latter should adopt artificial intelligence (AI) considering sales effort. We consider several important factors that affect the SC partners’ decision-making including live broadcasting power, consumer expectations of the product, and unfit probability that the consumer is unsatisfied with the bought product. Specifically, the “live broadcasting power” refers to the power of influencers’ personal influence and fans group to enhance product sales. The results are as follows: First, the optimal production quantity of the offline channel (platform) exhibits a positive (negative) correlation with the retail price of the offline channel in the agency mode with AI. Nevertheless, in the resale mode, the retail price of the offline channel has no influence on the two channels’ optimal production quantities. Second, with low marginal cost of adopting AI, the live broadcasting platform should (not) adopt AI under high (low) live broadcasting power. With high marginal cost of adopting AI, the live broadcasting platform should (not) adopt AI under low or high (moderate) live broadcasting power. In addition, the manufacturer without AI should select the agency mode (resale mode) under high (low) live broadcasting power, while the manufacturer with AI should always collaborate with the live broadcasting platform implementing the agency mode. Finally, the agency and resale modes can achieve coordination between the two firms. We also consider the partial unfit probability, hybrid mode, and “webrooming” behavior to extend our study, and numerically demonstrate our analytical findings’ robustness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Nano Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724003771/pdfft?md5=e58aae53ae054e8ab45f5640e192cd66&pid=1-s2.0-S0377221724003771-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should live broadcasting platforms adopt artificial intelligence? A sales effort perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoping Xu ,&nbsp;Yuting Wang ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng ,&nbsp;Tsan-Ming Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We analytically investigate a supply chain (SC) that is composed of a manufacturer and a live broadcasting platform, and examine whether the latter should adopt artificial intelligence (AI) considering sales effort. We consider several important factors that affect the SC partners’ decision-making including live broadcasting power, consumer expectations of the product, and unfit probability that the consumer is unsatisfied with the bought product. Specifically, the “live broadcasting power” refers to the power of influencers’ personal influence and fans group to enhance product sales. The results are as follows: First, the optimal production quantity of the offline channel (platform) exhibits a positive (negative) correlation with the retail price of the offline channel in the agency mode with AI. Nevertheless, in the resale mode, the retail price of the offline channel has no influence on the two channels’ optimal production quantities. Second, with low marginal cost of adopting AI, the live broadcasting platform should (not) adopt AI under high (low) live broadcasting power. With high marginal cost of adopting AI, the live broadcasting platform should (not) adopt AI under low or high (moderate) live broadcasting power. In addition, the manufacturer without AI should select the agency mode (resale mode) under high (low) live broadcasting power, while the manufacturer with AI should always collaborate with the live broadcasting platform implementing the agency mode. Finally, the agency and resale modes can achieve coordination between the two firms. We also consider the partial unfit probability, hybrid mode, and “webrooming” behavior to extend our study, and numerically demonstrate our analytical findings’ robustness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Nano Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724003771/pdfft?md5=e58aae53ae054e8ab45f5640e192cd66&pid=1-s2.0-S0377221724003771-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Nano Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724003771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Nano Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724003771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对由制造商和直播平台组成的供应链(SC)进行了分析研究,并探讨了后者在考虑销售工作时是否应采用人工智能(AI)。我们考虑了影响供应链合作伙伴决策的几个重要因素,包括直播能力、消费者对产品的期望以及消费者对所购产品不满意的不合适概率。其中,"直播力 "是指影响力者的个人影响力和粉丝群体对产品销售的促进作用。研究结果如下:首先,在有人工智能的代理模式下,线下渠道(平台)的最优生产量与线下渠道的零售价呈正(负)相关。然而,在转售模式下,线下渠道的零售价格对两种渠道的最优生产量没有影响。其次,采用人工智能的边际成本低,直播平台在直播能力高(低)的情况下应(不)采用人工智能。在采用人工智能的边际成本较高的情况下,直播平台应该(不应该)在低或高(中等)直播功率下采用人工智能。此外,没有人工智能的制造商应选择高(低)直播功率下的代理模式(转售模式),而有人工智能的制造商应始终与实施代理模式的直播平台合作。最后,代理模式和转售模式可以实现两家公司之间的协调。我们还考虑了部分不适合概率、混合模式和 "网络rooming "行为,以扩展我们的研究,并用数字证明了我们分析结论的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should live broadcasting platforms adopt artificial intelligence? A sales effort perspective

We analytically investigate a supply chain (SC) that is composed of a manufacturer and a live broadcasting platform, and examine whether the latter should adopt artificial intelligence (AI) considering sales effort. We consider several important factors that affect the SC partners’ decision-making including live broadcasting power, consumer expectations of the product, and unfit probability that the consumer is unsatisfied with the bought product. Specifically, the “live broadcasting power” refers to the power of influencers’ personal influence and fans group to enhance product sales. The results are as follows: First, the optimal production quantity of the offline channel (platform) exhibits a positive (negative) correlation with the retail price of the offline channel in the agency mode with AI. Nevertheless, in the resale mode, the retail price of the offline channel has no influence on the two channels’ optimal production quantities. Second, with low marginal cost of adopting AI, the live broadcasting platform should (not) adopt AI under high (low) live broadcasting power. With high marginal cost of adopting AI, the live broadcasting platform should (not) adopt AI under low or high (moderate) live broadcasting power. In addition, the manufacturer without AI should select the agency mode (resale mode) under high (low) live broadcasting power, while the manufacturer with AI should always collaborate with the live broadcasting platform implementing the agency mode. Finally, the agency and resale modes can achieve coordination between the two firms. We also consider the partial unfit probability, hybrid mode, and “webrooming” behavior to extend our study, and numerically demonstrate our analytical findings’ robustness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
1601
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Nano Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to applications of nanomaterials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important applications of nanomaterials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信