微波、平底锅加热和炖煮香草和香料的总酚类物质含量

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jonathan Nixon, Piranavi Sinnakandu, Magali Chohan
{"title":"微波、平底锅加热和炖煮香草和香料的总酚类物质含量","authors":"Jonathan Nixon,&nbsp;Piranavi Sinnakandu,&nbsp;Magali Chohan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Culinary herbs and spices help improve food flavour in cuisine all over the globe and possess some of the richest sources of polyphenols in edible plant foods which are linked to human health benefits. Food processing can affect these constituents and therefore may impact the health benefits these plants may confer. This study aimed to assess the impact of 3 commonly used domestic cooking methods on the total phenolic content, assessed via the total phenolic content (TPC) assay, on 15 culinary herbs and 12 spices, fresh and dried (50 samples total). Herbs and spices uncooked (aqueous extracts), microwaved with water (4 min), pan-heated without medium in a non-stick pan (5, 10, 15 and 20 min) and stewed with water (30, 60 and 120 min) were tested (n = 3) for TPC, expressed in gallic acid equivalent (GAE). TPC for uncooked plants were ranked from very low (below 50 GAE mg/100g) to very high (over 4000 GAE mg/100g). Dried herbs and spices were significantly higher in TPC than their fresh counterparts (P &lt; 0.01). Despite exceptions to the general trend, overall microwaving increased the TPC by 18% compared to uncooked extracts (P &lt; 0.01). Pan-heating in a non-stick pan caused a significant decrease in TPC, averaging 14% (p &lt; 0.01), similar between the 4 lengths of times. Stewing significantly increased the TPC (p &lt; 0.01) by 26% at 30 min, 39% at 60 min and 46% at 120 min. Therefore, polyphenol bioaccessibility in culinary herbs and spices decreased with dry pan-heating but increased with microwaving and stewing with water.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48594,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total phenolic content of microwaved, pan-heated and stewed, herbs and spices\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Nixon,&nbsp;Piranavi Sinnakandu,&nbsp;Magali Chohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Culinary herbs and spices help improve food flavour in cuisine all over the globe and possess some of the richest sources of polyphenols in edible plant foods which are linked to human health benefits. Food processing can affect these constituents and therefore may impact the health benefits these plants may confer. This study aimed to assess the impact of 3 commonly used domestic cooking methods on the total phenolic content, assessed via the total phenolic content (TPC) assay, on 15 culinary herbs and 12 spices, fresh and dried (50 samples total). Herbs and spices uncooked (aqueous extracts), microwaved with water (4 min), pan-heated without medium in a non-stick pan (5, 10, 15 and 20 min) and stewed with water (30, 60 and 120 min) were tested (n = 3) for TPC, expressed in gallic acid equivalent (GAE). TPC for uncooked plants were ranked from very low (below 50 GAE mg/100g) to very high (over 4000 GAE mg/100g). Dried herbs and spices were significantly higher in TPC than their fresh counterparts (P &lt; 0.01). Despite exceptions to the general trend, overall microwaving increased the TPC by 18% compared to uncooked extracts (P &lt; 0.01). Pan-heating in a non-stick pan caused a significant decrease in TPC, averaging 14% (p &lt; 0.01), similar between the 4 lengths of times. Stewing significantly increased the TPC (p &lt; 0.01) by 26% at 30 min, 39% at 60 min and 46% at 120 min. Therefore, polyphenol bioaccessibility in culinary herbs and spices decreased with dry pan-heating but increased with microwaving and stewing with water.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X24000854\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X24000854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烹饪香草和香料有助于改善全球各地菜肴的风味,它们是可食用植物食品中多酚含量最丰富的来源,与人类健康的益处息息相关。食品加工会影响这些成分,因此可能会影响这些植物可能带来的健康益处。本研究旨在通过总酚含量(TPC)测定法评估 15 种烹饪草本植物和 12 种香料(新鲜和干燥)(共 50 个样本)的 3 种常用烹饪方法对总酚含量的影响。对未烹煮(水提取物)、加水微波(4 分钟)、在不粘锅中无介质平底锅加热(5、10、15 和 20 分钟)和加水炖煮(30、60 和 120 分钟)的草药和香料(n = 3)进行了总酚含量测试,以没食子酸当量(GAE)表示。未烹煮植物的 TPC 含量从非常低(低于 50 GAE mg/100g)到非常高(超过 4000 GAE mg/100g)不等。干香草和香料的 TPC 明显高于新鲜香草和香料(P < 0.01)。尽管总体趋势有例外,但与未烹煮的提取物相比,微波加热总体上增加了 18% 的 TPC(P < 0.01)。在不粘锅中加热会导致 TPC 显著下降,平均下降 14% (P < 0.01),4 种加热时间长度相似。炖煮在 30 分钟、60 分钟和 120 分钟时,TPC 都会明显增加 26%(p < 0.01)、39% 和 46%。因此,烹饪香草和香料中的多酚生物可及性在干锅加热时会降低,但在微波加热和加水炖煮时会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Total phenolic content of microwaved, pan-heated and stewed, herbs and spices

Culinary herbs and spices help improve food flavour in cuisine all over the globe and possess some of the richest sources of polyphenols in edible plant foods which are linked to human health benefits. Food processing can affect these constituents and therefore may impact the health benefits these plants may confer. This study aimed to assess the impact of 3 commonly used domestic cooking methods on the total phenolic content, assessed via the total phenolic content (TPC) assay, on 15 culinary herbs and 12 spices, fresh and dried (50 samples total). Herbs and spices uncooked (aqueous extracts), microwaved with water (4 min), pan-heated without medium in a non-stick pan (5, 10, 15 and 20 min) and stewed with water (30, 60 and 120 min) were tested (n = 3) for TPC, expressed in gallic acid equivalent (GAE). TPC for uncooked plants were ranked from very low (below 50 GAE mg/100g) to very high (over 4000 GAE mg/100g). Dried herbs and spices were significantly higher in TPC than their fresh counterparts (P < 0.01). Despite exceptions to the general trend, overall microwaving increased the TPC by 18% compared to uncooked extracts (P < 0.01). Pan-heating in a non-stick pan caused a significant decrease in TPC, averaging 14% (p < 0.01), similar between the 4 lengths of times. Stewing significantly increased the TPC (p < 0.01) by 26% at 30 min, 39% at 60 min and 46% at 120 min. Therefore, polyphenol bioaccessibility in culinary herbs and spices decreased with dry pan-heating but increased with microwaving and stewing with water.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
170
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science is a peer-reviewed journal that explicitly focuses on the interface of food science and gastronomy. Articles focusing only on food science will not be considered. This journal equally encourages both scientists and chefs to publish original scientific papers, review articles and original culinary works. We seek articles with clear evidence of this interaction. From a scientific perspective, this publication aims to become the home for research from the whole community of food science and gastronomy. IJGFS explores all aspects related to the growing field of the interaction of gastronomy and food science, in areas such as food chemistry, food technology and culinary techniques, food microbiology, genetics, sensory science, neuroscience, psychology, culinary concepts, culinary trends, and gastronomic experience (all the elements that contribute to the appreciation and enjoyment of the meal. Also relevant is research on science-based educational programs in gastronomy, anthropology, gastronomic history and food sociology. All these areas of knowledge are crucial to gastronomy, as they contribute to a better understanding of this broad term and its practical implications for science and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信