运动是良药,但为了什么?英国好的临床指南中有关体育锻炼建议的绘图审查

Matthew D Jones, Mr Avi Goodman, Michael C. Ferraro, Mr Harrison Hansford, James H McAuley
{"title":"运动是良药,但为了什么?英国好的临床指南中有关体育锻炼建议的绘图审查","authors":"Matthew D Jones, Mr Avi Goodman, Michael C. Ferraro, Mr Harrison Hansford, James H McAuley","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Clinical guidelines are used to inform best practice care, with research evidence a key aspect informing guideline recommendations. Physical activity is recommended for the management of a large variety of health conditions; however, the conditions that physical activity is recommended for has not been synthesised, nor has the quality of the evidence that informs these guideline recommendations.\n \n \n \n To understand the extent and type of evidence for physical activity recommendations across different health conditions in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines.\n \n \n \n NICE was searched for clinical guidelines that recommended physical activity in the management/treatment of a health condition. Data relating to the condition, guideline date, physical activity recommendation(s) (general or specific), and evidence underpinning the recommendations was extracted. Where applicable, recommendations for research, priorities for implementation, and impact of the recommendations was also extracted.\n \n \n \n 221 clinical guidelines were reviewed, of which 52 provided one or more physical activity recommendations and were included in the analysis. The guidelines covered a range of conditions including cardiovascular, mental health, metabolic, neurological, musculoskeletal, and others. Most guidelines (n=43) provided general physical activity recommendations (e.g. advice to be active) whereas only 9 provided specific recommendations (e.g. type and dose of physical activity). The evidence underpinning the physical activity recommendations in the guidelines was mixed but was mostly based on very low-moderate quality evidence. Despite this, few guidelines recommended further research around physical activity.\n \n \n \n Physical activity is recommended in many clinical guidelines, demonstrating its perceived importance for improving health across a wide range of different conditions. The mostly low-quality evidence on which these recommendations are based questions why more guidelines do not recommend further high-quality research into physical activity. This would improve confidence in the evidence and hence confidence in the recommendations made by the guidelines.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXERCISE IS MEDICINE, BUT FOR WHAT? A MAPPING REVIEW OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UK NICE CLINICAL GUIDELINES\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D Jones, Mr Avi Goodman, Michael C. Ferraro, Mr Harrison Hansford, James H McAuley\",\"doi\":\"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Clinical guidelines are used to inform best practice care, with research evidence a key aspect informing guideline recommendations. Physical activity is recommended for the management of a large variety of health conditions; however, the conditions that physical activity is recommended for has not been synthesised, nor has the quality of the evidence that informs these guideline recommendations.\\n \\n \\n \\n To understand the extent and type of evidence for physical activity recommendations across different health conditions in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines.\\n \\n \\n \\n NICE was searched for clinical guidelines that recommended physical activity in the management/treatment of a health condition. Data relating to the condition, guideline date, physical activity recommendation(s) (general or specific), and evidence underpinning the recommendations was extracted. Where applicable, recommendations for research, priorities for implementation, and impact of the recommendations was also extracted.\\n \\n \\n \\n 221 clinical guidelines were reviewed, of which 52 provided one or more physical activity recommendations and were included in the analysis. The guidelines covered a range of conditions including cardiovascular, mental health, metabolic, neurological, musculoskeletal, and others. Most guidelines (n=43) provided general physical activity recommendations (e.g. advice to be active) whereas only 9 provided specific recommendations (e.g. type and dose of physical activity). The evidence underpinning the physical activity recommendations in the guidelines was mixed but was mostly based on very low-moderate quality evidence. Despite this, few guidelines recommended further research around physical activity.\\n \\n \\n \\n Physical activity is recommended in many clinical guidelines, demonstrating its perceived importance for improving health across a wide range of different conditions. The mostly low-quality evidence on which these recommendations are based questions why more guidelines do not recommend further high-quality research into physical activity. This would improve confidence in the evidence and hence confidence in the recommendations made by the guidelines.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床指南用于指导最佳护理实践,而研究证据是指南建议的一个重要方面。体育锻炼被推荐用于多种健康状况的管理;然而,体育锻炼被推荐用于哪些健康状况,以及为这些指南建议提供依据的证据的质量如何,尚未进行综合分析。 了解英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)临床指南中针对不同健康状况推荐体育锻炼的证据范围和类型。 在 NICE 中搜索了建议在管理/治疗某种健康状况时进行体育锻炼的临床指南。提取了与病症、指南日期、体育锻炼建议(一般或特定)以及建议所依据的证据相关的数据。在适用的情况下,还提取了研究建议、实施重点以及建议的影响。 共查阅了 221 份临床指南,其中 52 份提供了一项或多项体育锻炼建议并被纳入分析。这些指南涵盖了心血管、心理健康、代谢、神经、肌肉骨骼等一系列疾病。大多数指南(n=43)提供了一般性的体育锻炼建议(如建议积极锻炼),只有 9 份指南提供了具体建议(如体育锻炼的类型和剂量)。指南中体育锻炼建议所依据的证据参差不齐,但大多基于质量很低-中等的证据。尽管如此,很少有指南建议围绕体育锻炼开展进一步研究。 许多临床指南都建议进行体育锻炼,这表明体育锻炼对改善各种不同疾病的健康状况具有重要意义。这些建议所依据的大多是低质量的证据,这让人质疑为什么更多的指南不建议对体育锻炼进行进一步的高质量研究。这将提高人们对证据的信心,从而提高人们对指南所提建议的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXERCISE IS MEDICINE, BUT FOR WHAT? A MAPPING REVIEW OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UK NICE CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Clinical guidelines are used to inform best practice care, with research evidence a key aspect informing guideline recommendations. Physical activity is recommended for the management of a large variety of health conditions; however, the conditions that physical activity is recommended for has not been synthesised, nor has the quality of the evidence that informs these guideline recommendations. To understand the extent and type of evidence for physical activity recommendations across different health conditions in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines. NICE was searched for clinical guidelines that recommended physical activity in the management/treatment of a health condition. Data relating to the condition, guideline date, physical activity recommendation(s) (general or specific), and evidence underpinning the recommendations was extracted. Where applicable, recommendations for research, priorities for implementation, and impact of the recommendations was also extracted. 221 clinical guidelines were reviewed, of which 52 provided one or more physical activity recommendations and were included in the analysis. The guidelines covered a range of conditions including cardiovascular, mental health, metabolic, neurological, musculoskeletal, and others. Most guidelines (n=43) provided general physical activity recommendations (e.g. advice to be active) whereas only 9 provided specific recommendations (e.g. type and dose of physical activity). The evidence underpinning the physical activity recommendations in the guidelines was mixed but was mostly based on very low-moderate quality evidence. Despite this, few guidelines recommended further research around physical activity. Physical activity is recommended in many clinical guidelines, demonstrating its perceived importance for improving health across a wide range of different conditions. The mostly low-quality evidence on which these recommendations are based questions why more guidelines do not recommend further high-quality research into physical activity. This would improve confidence in the evidence and hence confidence in the recommendations made by the guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信