实现飞跃:通过谈判获取资源

Truls Erikson, Daniel Leunbach, Yangyang Zhao
{"title":"实现飞跃:通过谈判获取资源","authors":"Truls Erikson,&nbsp;Daniel Leunbach,&nbsp;Yangyang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvd.2024.100021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To suspend uncertainty, we can simply just choose to believe. A leap of faith - or the <em>suspension</em> of uncertainty - is the essence of trust, yet it remains a relatively unexplored phenomenon within the entrepreneurship literature. Trust reflects a willingness to bear risks, and as such, it is an underappreciated risk-bearing mechanism. Choosing to trust not only translates into the way entrepreneurs negotiate, but as we will see, also into the negotiated outcome. In the current study, we show that trust relates positively to negotiations, but we find that positional negotiations relate negatively to accomplishments, whereas collaborative negotiations relate positively. We study entrepreneurs who act <em>as if</em> those whom they are negotiating with are trustworthy, and we explore the effects of such leaps of faith on not only collaborative, but also positional negotiations, and their interaction effects. Using abductive reasoning, we unpack three related design principles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Design","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277424000021/pdfft?md5=8c07de83044af4a6d7bc64ca17eca03a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667277424000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the leap: Negotiating resource acquisition\",\"authors\":\"Truls Erikson,&nbsp;Daniel Leunbach,&nbsp;Yangyang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvd.2024.100021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To suspend uncertainty, we can simply just choose to believe. A leap of faith - or the <em>suspension</em> of uncertainty - is the essence of trust, yet it remains a relatively unexplored phenomenon within the entrepreneurship literature. Trust reflects a willingness to bear risks, and as such, it is an underappreciated risk-bearing mechanism. Choosing to trust not only translates into the way entrepreneurs negotiate, but as we will see, also into the negotiated outcome. In the current study, we show that trust relates positively to negotiations, but we find that positional negotiations relate negatively to accomplishments, whereas collaborative negotiations relate positively. We study entrepreneurs who act <em>as if</em> those whom they are negotiating with are trustworthy, and we explore the effects of such leaps of faith on not only collaborative, but also positional negotiations, and their interaction effects. Using abductive reasoning, we unpack three related design principles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Design\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277424000021/pdfft?md5=8c07de83044af4a6d7bc64ca17eca03a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667277424000021-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277424000021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277424000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了中止不确定性,我们可以简单地选择相信。信念的飞跃--或中止不确定性--是信任的精髓,但在创业文献中,这仍是一个相对未被探讨的现象。信任反映了承担风险的意愿,因此,它是一种未得到充分重视的风险承担机制。选择信任不仅体现在创业者的谈判方式上,而且正如我们将看到的,还体现在谈判结果上。在当前的研究中,我们发现信任与谈判有正面关系,但立场谈判与成就有负面关系,而合作谈判与成就有正面关系。我们研究了那些认为与自己谈判的人值得信任的企业家,并探讨了这种信任的飞跃不仅对合作谈判,而且对立场谈判的影响,以及它们之间的互动效应。通过归纳推理,我们解读了三个相关的设计原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making the leap: Negotiating resource acquisition

To suspend uncertainty, we can simply just choose to believe. A leap of faith - or the suspension of uncertainty - is the essence of trust, yet it remains a relatively unexplored phenomenon within the entrepreneurship literature. Trust reflects a willingness to bear risks, and as such, it is an underappreciated risk-bearing mechanism. Choosing to trust not only translates into the way entrepreneurs negotiate, but as we will see, also into the negotiated outcome. In the current study, we show that trust relates positively to negotiations, but we find that positional negotiations relate negatively to accomplishments, whereas collaborative negotiations relate positively. We study entrepreneurs who act as if those whom they are negotiating with are trustworthy, and we explore the effects of such leaps of faith on not only collaborative, but also positional negotiations, and their interaction effects. Using abductive reasoning, we unpack three related design principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信