优化原始数据选择,减少呼吸控制四维序列扫描的伪影

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Juliane Szkitsak , Andre Karius , Susanne Fernolendt , Philipp Schubert , Stefan Speer , Rainer Fietkau , Christoph Bert , Christian Hofmann
{"title":"优化原始数据选择,减少呼吸控制四维序列扫描的伪影","authors":"Juliane Szkitsak ,&nbsp;Andre Karius ,&nbsp;Susanne Fernolendt ,&nbsp;Philipp Schubert ,&nbsp;Stefan Speer ,&nbsp;Rainer Fietkau ,&nbsp;Christoph Bert ,&nbsp;Christian Hofmann","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Even with most breathing-controlled four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms image artifacts caused by single significant longer breathing still occur, resulting in negative consequences for radiotherapy. Our study presents first phantom examinations of a new optimized raw data selection and binning algorithm, aiming to improve image quality and geometric accuracy without additional dose exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>To validate the new approach, phantom measurements were performed to assess geometric accuracy (volume fidelity, root mean square error, Dice coefficient of volume overlap) for one- and three-dimensional tumor motion trajectories with and without considering motion hysteresis effects. Scans without significantly longer breathing cycles served as references.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median volume deviations between optimized approach and reference of at maximum 1% were obtained considering all movements. In comparison, standard reconstruction yielded median deviations of 9%, 21% and 12% for one-dimensional, three-dimensional, and hysteresis motion, respectively. Measurements in one- and three-dimensional directions reached a median Dice coefficient of 0.970 ± 0.013 and 0.975 ± 0.012, respectively, but only 0.918 ± 0.075 for hysteresis motions averaged over all measurements for the optimized selection. However, for the standard reconstruction median Dice coefficients were 0.845 ± 0.200, 0.868 ± 0.205 and 0.915 ± 0.075 for one- and three-dimensional as well as hysteresis motions, respectively. Median root mean square errors for the optimized algorithm were 30 ± 16<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> and 120 ± 90<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> for three-dimensional and hysteresis motions, compared to 212 ± 145<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> and 130 ± 131<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> for the standard reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The algorithm was proven to reduce 4DCT-related artifacts due to missing projection data without further dose exposure. An improvement in radiotherapy treatment planning due to better image quality can be expected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162400054X/pdfft?md5=ed2755033be696dda13b8442200c2133&pid=1-s2.0-S240563162400054X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized raw data selection for artifact reduction of breathing controlled four-dimensional sequence scanning\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Szkitsak ,&nbsp;Andre Karius ,&nbsp;Susanne Fernolendt ,&nbsp;Philipp Schubert ,&nbsp;Stefan Speer ,&nbsp;Rainer Fietkau ,&nbsp;Christoph Bert ,&nbsp;Christian Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Even with most breathing-controlled four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms image artifacts caused by single significant longer breathing still occur, resulting in negative consequences for radiotherapy. Our study presents first phantom examinations of a new optimized raw data selection and binning algorithm, aiming to improve image quality and geometric accuracy without additional dose exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>To validate the new approach, phantom measurements were performed to assess geometric accuracy (volume fidelity, root mean square error, Dice coefficient of volume overlap) for one- and three-dimensional tumor motion trajectories with and without considering motion hysteresis effects. Scans without significantly longer breathing cycles served as references.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median volume deviations between optimized approach and reference of at maximum 1% were obtained considering all movements. In comparison, standard reconstruction yielded median deviations of 9%, 21% and 12% for one-dimensional, three-dimensional, and hysteresis motion, respectively. Measurements in one- and three-dimensional directions reached a median Dice coefficient of 0.970 ± 0.013 and 0.975 ± 0.012, respectively, but only 0.918 ± 0.075 for hysteresis motions averaged over all measurements for the optimized selection. However, for the standard reconstruction median Dice coefficients were 0.845 ± 0.200, 0.868 ± 0.205 and 0.915 ± 0.075 for one- and three-dimensional as well as hysteresis motions, respectively. Median root mean square errors for the optimized algorithm were 30 ± 16<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> and 120 ± 90<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> for three-dimensional and hysteresis motions, compared to 212 ± 145<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> and 130 ± 131<!--> <!-->HU<sup>2</sup> for the standard reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The algorithm was proven to reduce 4DCT-related artifacts due to missing projection data without further dose exposure. An improvement in radiotherapy treatment planning due to better image quality can be expected.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162400054X/pdfft?md5=ed2755033be696dda13b8442200c2133&pid=1-s2.0-S240563162400054X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162400054X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162400054X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的即使使用大多数呼吸控制四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)算法,仍会出现因单次较长时间呼吸而造成的图像伪影,从而给放疗带来负面影响。为了验证这种新方法,我们进行了人体模型测量,以评估在考虑和不考虑运动滞后效应的情况下,一维和三维肿瘤运动轨迹的几何精度(体积保真度、均方根误差、体积重叠的 Dice 系数)。结果在所有运动中,优化方法与参考方法之间的平均体积偏差最大为 1%。相比之下,标准重建法在一维、三维和滞后运动方面的中位偏差分别为 9%、21% 和 12%。一维和三维方向的测量结果的狄斯系数中值分别为 0.970 ± 0.013 和 0.975 ± 0.012,但在优化选择的所有测量结果中,滞后运动的平均狄斯系数仅为 0.918 ± 0.075。然而,在标准重建中,一维和三维以及滞后运动的狄斯系数中值分别为 0.845 ± 0.200、0.868 ± 0.205 和 0.915 ± 0.075。优化算法在三维和滞后运动方面的中位均方根误差分别为 30 ± 16 HU2 和 120 ± 90 HU2,而标准重建的中位均方根误差分别为 212 ± 145 HU2 和 130 ± 131 HU2。由于图像质量更好,放疗计划有望得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimized raw data selection for artifact reduction of breathing controlled four-dimensional sequence scanning

Background and purpose

Even with most breathing-controlled four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms image artifacts caused by single significant longer breathing still occur, resulting in negative consequences for radiotherapy. Our study presents first phantom examinations of a new optimized raw data selection and binning algorithm, aiming to improve image quality and geometric accuracy without additional dose exposure.

Materials and methods

To validate the new approach, phantom measurements were performed to assess geometric accuracy (volume fidelity, root mean square error, Dice coefficient of volume overlap) for one- and three-dimensional tumor motion trajectories with and without considering motion hysteresis effects. Scans without significantly longer breathing cycles served as references.

Results

Median volume deviations between optimized approach and reference of at maximum 1% were obtained considering all movements. In comparison, standard reconstruction yielded median deviations of 9%, 21% and 12% for one-dimensional, three-dimensional, and hysteresis motion, respectively. Measurements in one- and three-dimensional directions reached a median Dice coefficient of 0.970 ± 0.013 and 0.975 ± 0.012, respectively, but only 0.918 ± 0.075 for hysteresis motions averaged over all measurements for the optimized selection. However, for the standard reconstruction median Dice coefficients were 0.845 ± 0.200, 0.868 ± 0.205 and 0.915 ± 0.075 for one- and three-dimensional as well as hysteresis motions, respectively. Median root mean square errors for the optimized algorithm were 30 ± 16 HU2 and 120 ± 90 HU2 for three-dimensional and hysteresis motions, compared to 212 ± 145 HU2 and 130 ± 131 HU2 for the standard reconstruction.

Conclusions

The algorithm was proven to reduce 4DCT-related artifacts due to missing projection data without further dose exposure. An improvement in radiotherapy treatment planning due to better image quality can be expected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信