一项随机对照试验,研究前十字韧带重建术后的功能恢复,采用单肌腱采集还是双肌腱采集

Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Adam Lawless, Mr Toby Leys, Mr Peter D’Alessandro
{"title":"一项随机对照试验,研究前十字韧带重建术后的功能恢复,采用单肌腱采集还是双肌腱采集","authors":"Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Adam Lawless, Mr Toby Leys, Mr Peter D’Alessandro","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common. While surgical reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly advocated and a hamstring autograft is the popular choice, hamstring tendon harvest has been linked to reduced hamstring strength and ongoing donor site pain. While traditional surgical techniques required a harvest of both semitendinosus/gracilis tendons, modern harvesting and fixation methods permit a shorter, broader harvest of semitendinosus only. This study investigated donor site pain, strength and functional recovery in patients undergoing ACLR via a single (ST) versus dual (DT) tendon hamstring harvest.\n \n \n \n This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 138 patients to ACLR with one of the two hamstring tendon graft options (ST=71, DT=67) followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including a validated donor-site morbidity score. Graft laxity, peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and a 6-hop performance battery were assessed. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated.\n \n \n \n All PROMs significantly improved (p<0.0001) and were largely similar between groups (p>0.05), apart from significantly less graft morbidity reported in the ST group (p=0.001). No group differences were observed for knee laxity or LSIs for hop measures (p>0.05), nor the LSIs for peak knee flexor (p=0.113) or extensor (p=0.286) torque.\n \n \n \n While the ST ACLR group reported significantly less harvest site morbidity, no other subjective or functional differences were observed in patients undergoing ACLR with either a single or dual hamstring tendon autograft harvest.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL INVESTIGATING FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING A SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE TENDON HARVEST\",\"authors\":\"Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Adam Lawless, Mr Toby Leys, Mr Peter D’Alessandro\",\"doi\":\"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common. While surgical reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly advocated and a hamstring autograft is the popular choice, hamstring tendon harvest has been linked to reduced hamstring strength and ongoing donor site pain. While traditional surgical techniques required a harvest of both semitendinosus/gracilis tendons, modern harvesting and fixation methods permit a shorter, broader harvest of semitendinosus only. This study investigated donor site pain, strength and functional recovery in patients undergoing ACLR via a single (ST) versus dual (DT) tendon hamstring harvest.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 138 patients to ACLR with one of the two hamstring tendon graft options (ST=71, DT=67) followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including a validated donor-site morbidity score. Graft laxity, peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and a 6-hop performance battery were assessed. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated.\\n \\n \\n \\n All PROMs significantly improved (p<0.0001) and were largely similar between groups (p>0.05), apart from significantly less graft morbidity reported in the ST group (p=0.001). No group differences were observed for knee laxity or LSIs for hop measures (p>0.05), nor the LSIs for peak knee flexor (p=0.113) or extensor (p=0.286) torque.\\n \\n \\n \\n While the ST ACLR group reported significantly less harvest site morbidity, no other subjective or functional differences were observed in patients undergoing ACLR with either a single or dual hamstring tendon autograft harvest.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前十字韧带(ACL)撕裂很常见。虽然手术重建(前交叉韧带撕裂重建术)通常被提倡,腘绳肌自体移植也是流行的选择,但腘绳肌肌腱的采集与腘绳肌肌力下降和持续的供体部位疼痛有关。传统的手术技术需要同时采集半腱肌腱和肱骨肌腱,而现代的采集和固定方法允许只采集更短更宽的半腱肌腱。本研究调查了通过单(ST)与双(DT)肌腱腘绳肌腱切断术进行前交叉韧带重建的患者的供体部位疼痛、肌力和功能恢复情况。 这项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)对 138 名患者进行了前交叉韧带置换术,并从两种腘绳肌腱移植方案中选择了一种(ST=71 人,DT=67 人),随后进行了结构化康复计划。患者在术前、术后3个月、6个月和12个月接受了一系列患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)评估,包括有效的供体部位发病率评分。此外,还对移植物松弛度、膝关节伸屈肌峰值等动肌力和 6 跳运动能力进行了评估。计算了肢体对称指数(LSI)。 所有 PROM 均有明显改善(P0.05),ST 组的移植物发病率明显降低(P=0.001)。膝关节松弛或跳跃测量的 LSIs 没有观察到组间差异(P>0.05),膝关节屈伸峰值扭矩的 LSIs 也没有观察到组间差异(P=0.113)或伸展扭矩的 LSIs 也没有观察到组间差异(P=0.286)。 虽然 ST ACLR 组报告的取材部位发病率明显较低,但在接受单股或双股腘绳肌腱自体移植物 ACLR 的患者中,未观察到其他主观或功能上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL INVESTIGATING FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING A SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE TENDON HARVEST
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common. While surgical reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly advocated and a hamstring autograft is the popular choice, hamstring tendon harvest has been linked to reduced hamstring strength and ongoing donor site pain. While traditional surgical techniques required a harvest of both semitendinosus/gracilis tendons, modern harvesting and fixation methods permit a shorter, broader harvest of semitendinosus only. This study investigated donor site pain, strength and functional recovery in patients undergoing ACLR via a single (ST) versus dual (DT) tendon hamstring harvest. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 138 patients to ACLR with one of the two hamstring tendon graft options (ST=71, DT=67) followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including a validated donor-site morbidity score. Graft laxity, peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and a 6-hop performance battery were assessed. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated. All PROMs significantly improved (p<0.0001) and were largely similar between groups (p>0.05), apart from significantly less graft morbidity reported in the ST group (p=0.001). No group differences were observed for knee laxity or LSIs for hop measures (p>0.05), nor the LSIs for peak knee flexor (p=0.113) or extensor (p=0.286) torque. While the ST ACLR group reported significantly less harvest site morbidity, no other subjective or functional differences were observed in patients undergoing ACLR with either a single or dual hamstring tendon autograft harvest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信