{"title":"燃料计量机构的单腔和双腔结构闭环特性研究","authors":"Peng Zhang, AnChang Jiang","doi":"10.1177/16878132241242986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two forms of engine fuel metering devices which are single and double chamber structures using electro-hydraulic servo valves as electro-hydraulic conversion devices to realize accurate fuel flow measurements and constant pressure differential valve is used to maintain the constant pressure difference of the metering valve. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the time domain and frequency domain characteristics of constant pressure differential valve assembly and compare the closed-loop characteristics of two metering mechanisms. Firstly, the mathematical model of constant pressure differential valve assembly (including the fuel pump and constant pressure differential valve) is established and its time and frequency domain characteristics are analyzed. The conclusion that the constant pressure differential of the metering valve can meet the practical requirements is obtained. Secondly, the mathematical models of single and double-chamber fuel metering mechanisms are established considering the specific working conditions. Finally, the characteristics of two kinds of metering mechanisms are compared and analyzed under the same control method in the time and frequency domain. The extension overshoot with a maximum value of 3.564% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is smaller than that of the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum extension overshoot of 6.04%. The negative overshoot with a maximum value of 1.391% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is bigger than the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum negative overshoot value of 1.17%. In terms of steady-state error, the steady-state error of a single chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum value of 0.194 mm and minimum value of 1.25e-6 mm is smaller than that maximum value of 0.302 mm and minimum value of 1.95e-6 mm of double chamber control metering valve mechanism under the same controller parameters. The bandwidth of the extension motion of the single and double chamber control metering valve is greater than that of the retraction motion. Under the same proportional control parameter, the bandwidth of the double chamber control metering valve extension motion system is greater than that of the single chamber extension motion system.","PeriodicalId":502561,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research of closed loop characteristics of single and double chamber structure for fuel metering mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Peng Zhang, AnChang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/16878132241242986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two forms of engine fuel metering devices which are single and double chamber structures using electro-hydraulic servo valves as electro-hydraulic conversion devices to realize accurate fuel flow measurements and constant pressure differential valve is used to maintain the constant pressure difference of the metering valve. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the time domain and frequency domain characteristics of constant pressure differential valve assembly and compare the closed-loop characteristics of two metering mechanisms. Firstly, the mathematical model of constant pressure differential valve assembly (including the fuel pump and constant pressure differential valve) is established and its time and frequency domain characteristics are analyzed. The conclusion that the constant pressure differential of the metering valve can meet the practical requirements is obtained. Secondly, the mathematical models of single and double-chamber fuel metering mechanisms are established considering the specific working conditions. Finally, the characteristics of two kinds of metering mechanisms are compared and analyzed under the same control method in the time and frequency domain. The extension overshoot with a maximum value of 3.564% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is smaller than that of the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum extension overshoot of 6.04%. The negative overshoot with a maximum value of 1.391% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is bigger than the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum negative overshoot value of 1.17%. In terms of steady-state error, the steady-state error of a single chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum value of 0.194 mm and minimum value of 1.25e-6 mm is smaller than that maximum value of 0.302 mm and minimum value of 1.95e-6 mm of double chamber control metering valve mechanism under the same controller parameters. The bandwidth of the extension motion of the single and double chamber control metering valve is greater than that of the retraction motion. Under the same proportional control parameter, the bandwidth of the double chamber control metering valve extension motion system is greater than that of the single chamber extension motion system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132241242986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132241242986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research of closed loop characteristics of single and double chamber structure for fuel metering mechanism
There are two forms of engine fuel metering devices which are single and double chamber structures using electro-hydraulic servo valves as electro-hydraulic conversion devices to realize accurate fuel flow measurements and constant pressure differential valve is used to maintain the constant pressure difference of the metering valve. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the time domain and frequency domain characteristics of constant pressure differential valve assembly and compare the closed-loop characteristics of two metering mechanisms. Firstly, the mathematical model of constant pressure differential valve assembly (including the fuel pump and constant pressure differential valve) is established and its time and frequency domain characteristics are analyzed. The conclusion that the constant pressure differential of the metering valve can meet the practical requirements is obtained. Secondly, the mathematical models of single and double-chamber fuel metering mechanisms are established considering the specific working conditions. Finally, the characteristics of two kinds of metering mechanisms are compared and analyzed under the same control method in the time and frequency domain. The extension overshoot with a maximum value of 3.564% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is smaller than that of the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum extension overshoot of 6.04%. The negative overshoot with a maximum value of 1.391% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is bigger than the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum negative overshoot value of 1.17%. In terms of steady-state error, the steady-state error of a single chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum value of 0.194 mm and minimum value of 1.25e-6 mm is smaller than that maximum value of 0.302 mm and minimum value of 1.95e-6 mm of double chamber control metering valve mechanism under the same controller parameters. The bandwidth of the extension motion of the single and double chamber control metering valve is greater than that of the retraction motion. Under the same proportional control parameter, the bandwidth of the double chamber control metering valve extension motion system is greater than that of the single chamber extension motion system.