利用无人机载图像进行深度估计和 3D 重建:对 UseGeo 数据集的评估

M. Hermann , M. Weinmann , F. Nex , E.K. Stathopoulou , F. Remondino , B. Jutzi , B. Ruf
{"title":"利用无人机载图像进行深度估计和 3D 重建:对 UseGeo 数据集的评估","authors":"M. Hermann ,&nbsp;M. Weinmann ,&nbsp;F. Nex ,&nbsp;E.K. Stathopoulou ,&nbsp;F. Remondino ,&nbsp;B. Jutzi ,&nbsp;B. Ruf","doi":"10.1016/j.ophoto.2024.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Depth estimation and 3D model reconstruction from aerial imagery is an important task in photogrammetry, remote sensing, and computer vision. To compare the performance of different image-based approaches, this study presents a benchmark for UAV-based aerial imagery using the UseGeo dataset. The contributions include the release of various evaluation routines on GitHub, as well as a comprehensive comparison of baseline approaches, such as methods for offline multi-view 3D reconstruction resulting in point clouds and triangle meshes, online multi-view depth estimation, as well as single-image depth estimation using self-supervised deep learning. With the release of our evaluation routines, we aim to provide a universal protocol for the evaluation of depth estimation and 3D reconstruction methods on the UseGeo dataset. The conducted experiments and analyses show that each method excels in a different category: the depth estimation from COLMAP outperforms that of the other approaches, ACMMP achieves the lowest error and highest completeness for point clouds, while OpenMVS produces triangle meshes with the lowest error. Among the online methods for depth estimation, the approach from the Plane-Sweep Library outperforms the FaSS-MVS approach, while the latter achieves the lowest processing time. And even though the particularly challenging nature of the dataset and the small amount of training data leads to a significantly higher error in the results of the self-supervised single-image depth estimation approach, it outperforms all other approaches in terms of processing time and frame rate. In our evaluation, we have also considered modern learning-based approaches that can be used for image-based 3D reconstruction, such as NeRFs. However, due to the significantly lower quality of the resulting 3D models, we have only included a qualitative comparison between NeRF-based and conventional approaches in the scope of this work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100730,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667393224000085/pdfft?md5=62b1d4520d924b174fc6755a9b752484&pid=1-s2.0-S2667393224000085-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depth estimation and 3D reconstruction from UAV-borne imagery: Evaluation on the UseGeo dataset\",\"authors\":\"M. Hermann ,&nbsp;M. Weinmann ,&nbsp;F. Nex ,&nbsp;E.K. Stathopoulou ,&nbsp;F. Remondino ,&nbsp;B. Jutzi ,&nbsp;B. Ruf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophoto.2024.100065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Depth estimation and 3D model reconstruction from aerial imagery is an important task in photogrammetry, remote sensing, and computer vision. To compare the performance of different image-based approaches, this study presents a benchmark for UAV-based aerial imagery using the UseGeo dataset. The contributions include the release of various evaluation routines on GitHub, as well as a comprehensive comparison of baseline approaches, such as methods for offline multi-view 3D reconstruction resulting in point clouds and triangle meshes, online multi-view depth estimation, as well as single-image depth estimation using self-supervised deep learning. With the release of our evaluation routines, we aim to provide a universal protocol for the evaluation of depth estimation and 3D reconstruction methods on the UseGeo dataset. The conducted experiments and analyses show that each method excels in a different category: the depth estimation from COLMAP outperforms that of the other approaches, ACMMP achieves the lowest error and highest completeness for point clouds, while OpenMVS produces triangle meshes with the lowest error. Among the online methods for depth estimation, the approach from the Plane-Sweep Library outperforms the FaSS-MVS approach, while the latter achieves the lowest processing time. And even though the particularly challenging nature of the dataset and the small amount of training data leads to a significantly higher error in the results of the self-supervised single-image depth estimation approach, it outperforms all other approaches in terms of processing time and frame rate. In our evaluation, we have also considered modern learning-based approaches that can be used for image-based 3D reconstruction, such as NeRFs. However, due to the significantly lower quality of the resulting 3D models, we have only included a qualitative comparison between NeRF-based and conventional approaches in the scope of this work.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667393224000085/pdfft?md5=62b1d4520d924b174fc6755a9b752484&pid=1-s2.0-S2667393224000085-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667393224000085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667393224000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据航空图像进行深度估计和三维模型重建是摄影测量、遥感和计算机视觉领域的一项重要任务。为了比较不同图像方法的性能,本研究利用 UseGeo 数据集为基于无人机的航空图像提供了一个基准。本研究的贡献包括在 GitHub 上发布各种评估例程,以及对基准方法进行全面比较,如离线多视角三维重建生成点云和三角网格的方法、在线多视角深度估计,以及使用自监督深度学习的单图像深度估计。随着评估例程的发布,我们的目标是为在 UseGeo 数据集上评估深度估计和三维重建方法提供一个通用协议。实验和分析表明,每种方法都在不同的类别中表现出色:COLMAP 的深度估计优于其他方法,ACMMP 的点云误差最小、完整性最高,而 OpenMVS 生成的三角形网格误差最小。在深度估计的在线方法中,Plane-Sweep 库的方法优于 FaSS-MVS 方法,而后者的处理时间最少。尽管数据集的特殊挑战性和少量的训练数据导致自监督单图像深度估算方法的结果误差显著增大,但它在处理时间和帧率方面优于所有其他方法。在评估中,我们还考虑了可用于基于图像的 3D 重建的现代学习方法,如 NeRF。不过,由于生成的三维模型质量明显较低,我们只将基于 NeRF 的方法与传统方法进行了定性比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Depth estimation and 3D reconstruction from UAV-borne imagery: Evaluation on the UseGeo dataset

Depth estimation and 3D model reconstruction from aerial imagery is an important task in photogrammetry, remote sensing, and computer vision. To compare the performance of different image-based approaches, this study presents a benchmark for UAV-based aerial imagery using the UseGeo dataset. The contributions include the release of various evaluation routines on GitHub, as well as a comprehensive comparison of baseline approaches, such as methods for offline multi-view 3D reconstruction resulting in point clouds and triangle meshes, online multi-view depth estimation, as well as single-image depth estimation using self-supervised deep learning. With the release of our evaluation routines, we aim to provide a universal protocol for the evaluation of depth estimation and 3D reconstruction methods on the UseGeo dataset. The conducted experiments and analyses show that each method excels in a different category: the depth estimation from COLMAP outperforms that of the other approaches, ACMMP achieves the lowest error and highest completeness for point clouds, while OpenMVS produces triangle meshes with the lowest error. Among the online methods for depth estimation, the approach from the Plane-Sweep Library outperforms the FaSS-MVS approach, while the latter achieves the lowest processing time. And even though the particularly challenging nature of the dataset and the small amount of training data leads to a significantly higher error in the results of the self-supervised single-image depth estimation approach, it outperforms all other approaches in terms of processing time and frame rate. In our evaluation, we have also considered modern learning-based approaches that can be used for image-based 3D reconstruction, such as NeRFs. However, due to the significantly lower quality of the resulting 3D models, we have only included a qualitative comparison between NeRF-based and conventional approaches in the scope of this work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信