在空气空腔和密度不均匀的情况下,使用 Al2O3 OSL 剂量计测量高能光子的深度剂量

Mohd Fahmi Mohd Yusof, Amirah Sauki, Nur Ateqah Suzaini, Arifah Nazirah Abdullah, Ahmad Bazlie Abd Kadir, Norriza Mohd Isa
{"title":"在空气空腔和密度不均匀的情况下,使用 Al2O3 OSL 剂量计测量高能光子的深度剂量","authors":"Mohd Fahmi Mohd Yusof, Amirah Sauki, Nur Ateqah Suzaini, Arifah Nazirah Abdullah, Ahmad Bazlie Abd Kadir, Norriza Mohd Isa","doi":"10.1088/1757-899x/1308/1/012011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Air cavities and tissue density inhomogeneity significantly affects the distribution of radiation doses, potentially resulting in adverse consequences such as cancer recurrence. This research aims to assess the accuracy of Al2O3 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters in measuring doses within varying thicknesses of air cavities (3, 5, and 8 cm) and tissue inhomogeneity of low and high density simulated by the lung and bone phantoms. An expanded polystyrene (EPS) was employed in homogeneous solid water® phantoms to simulate the air cavity. The percentage depth-dose (PDD) curves at 6 MV photons were obtained in both presence of air cavity and density inhomogeneity and compared to that in the EBT3 radiochromic film dosimeters and treatment planning system (TPS). The results indicated that the presence of an air cavity and tissue inhomogeneity affected the depth dose measured in OSL dosimeters, EBT3 films and TPS. OSLD and TPS showed good agreement at the centre of the cavity, which is within ±5% but could not estimate scattered radiation to the distal and proximal surfaces of the air cavity. The obtained p-values showed no significant differences of dose measured in OSL dosimeters compared to those in EBT3 films and TPS. The Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney showed no significant difference between OSL dosimeters, EBT3 film and TPS in the measurement of depth doses in the presence of density inhomogeneity. The overall results indicated the suitability of OSL dosimeters as indirect dosimeters for the measurements of depth dose in the presence of air cavity and tissue density inhomogeneity","PeriodicalId":509593,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depth dose measurement by using Al2O3 OSL dosimeters in high energy photons in the presence of air cavity and density inhomogeneity\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Fahmi Mohd Yusof, Amirah Sauki, Nur Ateqah Suzaini, Arifah Nazirah Abdullah, Ahmad Bazlie Abd Kadir, Norriza Mohd Isa\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1757-899x/1308/1/012011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Air cavities and tissue density inhomogeneity significantly affects the distribution of radiation doses, potentially resulting in adverse consequences such as cancer recurrence. This research aims to assess the accuracy of Al2O3 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters in measuring doses within varying thicknesses of air cavities (3, 5, and 8 cm) and tissue inhomogeneity of low and high density simulated by the lung and bone phantoms. An expanded polystyrene (EPS) was employed in homogeneous solid water® phantoms to simulate the air cavity. The percentage depth-dose (PDD) curves at 6 MV photons were obtained in both presence of air cavity and density inhomogeneity and compared to that in the EBT3 radiochromic film dosimeters and treatment planning system (TPS). The results indicated that the presence of an air cavity and tissue inhomogeneity affected the depth dose measured in OSL dosimeters, EBT3 films and TPS. OSLD and TPS showed good agreement at the centre of the cavity, which is within ±5% but could not estimate scattered radiation to the distal and proximal surfaces of the air cavity. The obtained p-values showed no significant differences of dose measured in OSL dosimeters compared to those in EBT3 films and TPS. The Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney showed no significant difference between OSL dosimeters, EBT3 film and TPS in the measurement of depth doses in the presence of density inhomogeneity. The overall results indicated the suitability of OSL dosimeters as indirect dosimeters for the measurements of depth dose in the presence of air cavity and tissue density inhomogeneity\",\"PeriodicalId\":509593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1308/1/012011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1308/1/012011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气腔和组织密度的不均匀性会严重影响辐射剂量的分布,可能导致癌症复发等不良后果。本研究旨在评估 Al2O3 光激发发光(OSL)剂量计在不同厚度的气腔(3、5 和 8 厘米)内测量剂量的准确性,以及肺部和骨骼模型模拟的低密度和高密度组织不均匀性。在均质固体水®模型中使用了发泡聚苯乙烯(EPS)来模拟气腔。在存在气腔和密度不均匀的情况下,获得了 6 MV 光子下的深度剂量百分比(PDD)曲线,并与 EBT3 射线变色膜剂量计和治疗计划系统(TPS)中的曲线进行了比较。结果表明,气腔和组织不均匀性会影响 OSL 剂量计、EBT3 薄膜和 TPS 测得的深度剂量。OSLD 和 TPS 在气腔中心显示出良好的一致性,在 ±5% 的范围内,但无法估算气腔远端和近端表面的散射辐射。得出的 p 值显示,OSL 剂量计测量的剂量与 EBT3 胶片和 TPS 测量的剂量相比没有显著差异。Kruskal Wallis 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验表明,在密度不均匀的情况下,OSL 剂量计、EBT3 薄膜和 TPS 在测量深度剂量方面没有明显差异。总体结果表明,OSL剂量计适合作为间接剂量计,在存在气腔和组织密度不均匀的情况下测量深度剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Depth dose measurement by using Al2O3 OSL dosimeters in high energy photons in the presence of air cavity and density inhomogeneity
Air cavities and tissue density inhomogeneity significantly affects the distribution of radiation doses, potentially resulting in adverse consequences such as cancer recurrence. This research aims to assess the accuracy of Al2O3 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters in measuring doses within varying thicknesses of air cavities (3, 5, and 8 cm) and tissue inhomogeneity of low and high density simulated by the lung and bone phantoms. An expanded polystyrene (EPS) was employed in homogeneous solid water® phantoms to simulate the air cavity. The percentage depth-dose (PDD) curves at 6 MV photons were obtained in both presence of air cavity and density inhomogeneity and compared to that in the EBT3 radiochromic film dosimeters and treatment planning system (TPS). The results indicated that the presence of an air cavity and tissue inhomogeneity affected the depth dose measured in OSL dosimeters, EBT3 films and TPS. OSLD and TPS showed good agreement at the centre of the cavity, which is within ±5% but could not estimate scattered radiation to the distal and proximal surfaces of the air cavity. The obtained p-values showed no significant differences of dose measured in OSL dosimeters compared to those in EBT3 films and TPS. The Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney showed no significant difference between OSL dosimeters, EBT3 film and TPS in the measurement of depth doses in the presence of density inhomogeneity. The overall results indicated the suitability of OSL dosimeters as indirect dosimeters for the measurements of depth dose in the presence of air cavity and tissue density inhomogeneity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信