Dina El Zarka , Anneliese Kelterer , Michele Gubian , Barbara Schuppler
{"title":"埃及阿拉伯语中主题、韵律和重点的前奏:对曲调、配置和说话者变异性的定量研究","authors":"Dina El Zarka , Anneliese Kelterer , Michele Gubian , Barbara Schuppler","doi":"10.1016/j.specom.2024.103082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the prosody of sentences elicited in three Information Structure (IS) conditions: all-new, theme-rheme and rhematic focus-background. The sentences were produced by 18 speakers of Egyptian Arabic (EA). This is the first quantitative study to provide a comprehensive analysis of holistic f0 contours (by means of GAMM) and configurations of f0, duration and intensity (by means of FPCA) associated with the three IS conditions, both across and within speakers. A significant difference between focus-background and the other information structure conditions was found, but also strong inter-speaker variation in terms of strategies and the degree to which these strategies were applied. The results suggest that post-focus register lowering and the duration of the stressed syllables of the focused and the utterance-final word are more consistent cues to focus than a higher peak of the focus accent. In addition, some independence of duration and intensity from f0 could be identified. These results thus support the assumption that, when focus is marked prosodically in EA, it is marked by prominence. Nevertheless, the fact that a considerable number of EA speakers did not apply prosodic marking and the fact that prosodic focus marking was gradient rather than categorical suggest that EA does not have a fully conventionalized prosodic focus construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49485,"journal":{"name":"Speech Communication","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 103082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639324000542/pdfft?md5=dcb4ae8365c4f0e84a5827d3ae202551&pid=1-s2.0-S0167639324000542-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prosody of theme, rheme and focus in Egyptian Arabic: A quantitative investigation of tunes, configurations and speaker variability\",\"authors\":\"Dina El Zarka , Anneliese Kelterer , Michele Gubian , Barbara Schuppler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.specom.2024.103082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the prosody of sentences elicited in three Information Structure (IS) conditions: all-new, theme-rheme and rhematic focus-background. The sentences were produced by 18 speakers of Egyptian Arabic (EA). This is the first quantitative study to provide a comprehensive analysis of holistic f0 contours (by means of GAMM) and configurations of f0, duration and intensity (by means of FPCA) associated with the three IS conditions, both across and within speakers. A significant difference between focus-background and the other information structure conditions was found, but also strong inter-speaker variation in terms of strategies and the degree to which these strategies were applied. The results suggest that post-focus register lowering and the duration of the stressed syllables of the focused and the utterance-final word are more consistent cues to focus than a higher peak of the focus accent. In addition, some independence of duration and intensity from f0 could be identified. These results thus support the assumption that, when focus is marked prosodically in EA, it is marked by prominence. Nevertheless, the fact that a considerable number of EA speakers did not apply prosodic marking and the fact that prosodic focus marking was gradient rather than categorical suggest that EA does not have a fully conventionalized prosodic focus construction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Speech Communication\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639324000542/pdfft?md5=dcb4ae8365c4f0e84a5827d3ae202551&pid=1-s2.0-S0167639324000542-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Speech Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639324000542\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Communication","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639324000542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了在三种信息结构(IS)条件下激发的句子的拟声:全新、主题-主题和主题-焦点-背景。句子是由 18 位讲埃及阿拉伯语(EA)的人发出的。这是首次对三种 IS 条件下的整体 f0 等高线(通过 GAMM)和与之相关的 f0、持续时间和强度配置(通过 FPCA)进行全面分析的定量研究,包括不同说话者之间和说话者内部的分析。结果发现,焦点-背景与其他信息结构条件之间存在明显差异,但在策略和策略应用程度方面,不同说话者之间也存在很大差异。研究结果表明,聚焦后的音位降低以及聚焦词和语篇末尾词的重读音节的持续时间比聚焦重音的峰值更高,是更一致的聚焦线索。此外,还可以发现持续时间和强度与 f0 有一定的独立性。因此,这些结果支持了这样的假设,即在 EA 中,当重点在前音上被标记时,它是通过突出来标记的。然而,相当多的东亚语使用者没有使用前音标记,而且前音重心标记是渐变的而不是分类的,这些事实表明东亚语并没有完全常规化的前音重心结构。
The prosody of theme, rheme and focus in Egyptian Arabic: A quantitative investigation of tunes, configurations and speaker variability
This paper investigates the prosody of sentences elicited in three Information Structure (IS) conditions: all-new, theme-rheme and rhematic focus-background. The sentences were produced by 18 speakers of Egyptian Arabic (EA). This is the first quantitative study to provide a comprehensive analysis of holistic f0 contours (by means of GAMM) and configurations of f0, duration and intensity (by means of FPCA) associated with the three IS conditions, both across and within speakers. A significant difference between focus-background and the other information structure conditions was found, but also strong inter-speaker variation in terms of strategies and the degree to which these strategies were applied. The results suggest that post-focus register lowering and the duration of the stressed syllables of the focused and the utterance-final word are more consistent cues to focus than a higher peak of the focus accent. In addition, some independence of duration and intensity from f0 could be identified. These results thus support the assumption that, when focus is marked prosodically in EA, it is marked by prominence. Nevertheless, the fact that a considerable number of EA speakers did not apply prosodic marking and the fact that prosodic focus marking was gradient rather than categorical suggest that EA does not have a fully conventionalized prosodic focus construction.
期刊介绍:
Speech Communication is an interdisciplinary journal whose primary objective is to fulfil the need for the rapid dissemination and thorough discussion of basic and applied research results.
The journal''s primary objectives are:
• to present a forum for the advancement of human and human-machine speech communication science;
• to stimulate cross-fertilization between different fields of this domain;
• to contribute towards the rapid and wide diffusion of scientifically sound contributions in this domain.