Ilan Merdler , Kalyan R. Chitturi , Abhishek Chaturvedi , Jason Li , Matteo Cellamare , Sevket Tolga Ozturk , Vaishnavi Sawant , Itsik Ben-Dor , Ron Waksman , Brian C. Case , Hayder D. Hashim
{"title":"冠状动脉微血管功能障碍与炎症:冠状动脉微血管疾病登记的启示","authors":"Ilan Merdler , Kalyan R. Chitturi , Abhishek Chaturvedi , Jason Li , Matteo Cellamare , Sevket Tolga Ozturk , Vaishnavi Sawant , Itsik Ben-Dor , Ron Waksman , Brian C. Case , Hayder D. Hashim","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary microvascular dysfunction<span> (CMD) is associated with various inflammatory conditions that worsen endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CMD and inflammation using common inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count (CBC) analysis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Information was gathered from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry to examine the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR), and monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) in a cohort of patients with angina who showed non-obstructive </span>coronary arteries and underwent invasive physiological assessments for CMD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 171 patients studied, 126 were CMD-negative and 45 were CMD-positive, constituting two groups of interest. The average age of all patients was 61.7 ± 11.1 years, and 63.7 % were female. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, or potential anti-inflammatory medications. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in NLR (2.54 ± 3.71 vs. 2.52 ± 2.28, <em>p</em> = 0.97), EMR (0.3 ± 0.21 vs. 0.34 ± 0.29, <em>p</em> = 0.31), or MHR (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01, <em>p</em> = 0.54) between CMD-positive and CMD-negative patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings did not show a noteworthy connection between CMD and inflammation, as suggested by various simple CBC-based biomarkers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary microvascular dysfunction and inflammation: Insights from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry\",\"authors\":\"Ilan Merdler , Kalyan R. Chitturi , Abhishek Chaturvedi , Jason Li , Matteo Cellamare , Sevket Tolga Ozturk , Vaishnavi Sawant , Itsik Ben-Dor , Ron Waksman , Brian C. Case , Hayder D. Hashim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary microvascular dysfunction<span> (CMD) is associated with various inflammatory conditions that worsen endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CMD and inflammation using common inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count (CBC) analysis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Information was gathered from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry to examine the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR), and monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) in a cohort of patients with angina who showed non-obstructive </span>coronary arteries and underwent invasive physiological assessments for CMD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 171 patients studied, 126 were CMD-negative and 45 were CMD-positive, constituting two groups of interest. The average age of all patients was 61.7 ± 11.1 years, and 63.7 % were female. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, or potential anti-inflammatory medications. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in NLR (2.54 ± 3.71 vs. 2.52 ± 2.28, <em>p</em> = 0.97), EMR (0.3 ± 0.21 vs. 0.34 ± 0.29, <em>p</em> = 0.31), or MHR (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01, <em>p</em> = 0.54) between CMD-positive and CMD-negative patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings did not show a noteworthy connection between CMD and inflammation, as suggested by various simple CBC-based biomarkers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 30-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838924004883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838924004883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coronary microvascular dysfunction and inflammation: Insights from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry
Background
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with various inflammatory conditions that worsen endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CMD and inflammation using common inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count (CBC) analysis.
Methods
Information was gathered from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry to examine the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR), and monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) in a cohort of patients with angina who showed non-obstructive coronary arteries and underwent invasive physiological assessments for CMD.
Results
Of the 171 patients studied, 126 were CMD-negative and 45 were CMD-positive, constituting two groups of interest. The average age of all patients was 61.7 ± 11.1 years, and 63.7 % were female. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, or potential anti-inflammatory medications. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in NLR (2.54 ± 3.71 vs. 2.52 ± 2.28, p = 0.97), EMR (0.3 ± 0.21 vs. 0.34 ± 0.29, p = 0.31), or MHR (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01, p = 0.54) between CMD-positive and CMD-negative patients.
Conclusion
Our findings did not show a noteworthy connection between CMD and inflammation, as suggested by various simple CBC-based biomarkers.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.