美国基于病理学的全肩关节置换术手术时间和相对值单位

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"美国基于病理学的全肩关节置换术手术时间和相对值单位","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite total shoulder arthroplasty<span> (TSA) and reverse TSA<span><span> (rTSA) being fundamentally different procedures, and indicated in different pathologies (rTSA for rotator cuff<span> deficiency [RCD] and proximal humeral fractures [PHFx] and anatomic TSA [aTSA] for glenohumeral </span></span>osteoarthritis<span> [GHOA]), they have the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (23472). This paper’s aim is to investigate differences in operative time and work-related value units (wRVUs) per hour among these pathologies, and ultimately determine if there is a need to assign separate CPTs for aTSA and rTSA.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort of data from the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was collected, all patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA (CPT: 23472) between the years of 2006 and 2019 for diagnoses of GHOA, RCD, and PHFx were included. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative time, and wRVUs per hour.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to GHOA (reference group), the average operative time for the RCD cohort was 12.242 minutes shorter (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), while the wRVUs were higher by 1.627 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). The average operative time for rTSAs in the PHFx cohort were 17.615 minutes longer (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), while the wRVUs were lower by 2.205 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The average operative time for rTSAs for both RCDs and PHFx were longer than that for aTSAs for GHOA. Additionally, wRVUs were lower for rTSAs for RCD and PHFx compared to aTSAs for GHOA. This elucidates inconsistency in reimbursement structure for the procedures, which should be revisited.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 663-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative time and relative value units for total shoulder arthroplasty based on pathology in the United States\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite total shoulder arthroplasty<span> (TSA) and reverse TSA<span><span> (rTSA) being fundamentally different procedures, and indicated in different pathologies (rTSA for rotator cuff<span> deficiency [RCD] and proximal humeral fractures [PHFx] and anatomic TSA [aTSA] for glenohumeral </span></span>osteoarthritis<span> [GHOA]), they have the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (23472). This paper’s aim is to investigate differences in operative time and work-related value units (wRVUs) per hour among these pathologies, and ultimately determine if there is a need to assign separate CPTs for aTSA and rTSA.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort of data from the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was collected, all patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA (CPT: 23472) between the years of 2006 and 2019 for diagnoses of GHOA, RCD, and PHFx were included. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative time, and wRVUs per hour.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to GHOA (reference group), the average operative time for the RCD cohort was 12.242 minutes shorter (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), while the wRVUs were higher by 1.627 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). The average operative time for rTSAs in the PHFx cohort were 17.615 minutes longer (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), while the wRVUs were lower by 2.205 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The average operative time for rTSAs for both RCDs and PHFx were longer than that for aTSAs for GHOA. Additionally, wRVUs were lower for rTSAs for RCD and PHFx compared to aTSAs for GHOA. This elucidates inconsistency in reimbursement structure for the procedures, which should be revisited.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 663-671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管全肩关节置换术(TSA)和反向 TSA(rTSA)在本质上是不同的手术,适用于不同的病理(rTSA 适用于肩袖缺损 [RCD] 和肱骨近端骨折 [PHFx],解剖型 TSA [aTSA] 适用于盂肱骨关节炎 [GHOA]),但它们具有相同的现行医疗程序术语 (CPT) 代码 (23472)。本文旨在研究这些病症在手术时间和每小时工作相关价值单位(wRVUs)方面的差异,并最终确定是否有必要为aTSA和rTSA分配不同的CPT.方法从美国外科医生学会-国家外科质量改进计划中收集了一组回顾性数据,纳入了2006年至2019年期间因诊断为GHOA、RCD和PHFx而接受aTSA或rTSA(CPT:23472)的所有患者。结果与 GHOA(参照组)相比,RCD 队列的平均手术时间缩短了 12.242 分钟(P < .001),而 wRVUs 则增加了 1.627(P < .001)。PHFx 队列中的 rTSAs 平均手术时间延长了 17.615 分钟(P <.001),而 wRVU 则降低了 2.205(P <.001)。此外,与 GHOA 的 aTSAs 相比,RCD 和 PHFx 的 rTSAs 的 wRVU 更低。这说明这些手术的报销结构不一致,应重新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operative time and relative value units for total shoulder arthroplasty based on pathology in the United States

Background

Despite total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) being fundamentally different procedures, and indicated in different pathologies (rTSA for rotator cuff deficiency [RCD] and proximal humeral fractures [PHFx] and anatomic TSA [aTSA] for glenohumeral osteoarthritis [GHOA]), they have the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (23472). This paper’s aim is to investigate differences in operative time and work-related value units (wRVUs) per hour among these pathologies, and ultimately determine if there is a need to assign separate CPTs for aTSA and rTSA.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of data from the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was collected, all patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA (CPT: 23472) between the years of 2006 and 2019 for diagnoses of GHOA, RCD, and PHFx were included. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative time, and wRVUs per hour.

Results

Compared to GHOA (reference group), the average operative time for the RCD cohort was 12.242 minutes shorter (P < .001), while the wRVUs were higher by 1.627 (P < .001). The average operative time for rTSAs in the PHFx cohort were 17.615 minutes longer (P < .001), while the wRVUs were lower by 2.205 (P < .001).

Conclusion

The average operative time for rTSAs for both RCDs and PHFx were longer than that for aTSAs for GHOA. Additionally, wRVUs were lower for rTSAs for RCD and PHFx compared to aTSAs for GHOA. This elucidates inconsistency in reimbursement structure for the procedures, which should be revisited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信