{"title":"美国基于病理学的全肩关节置换术手术时间和相对值单位","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite total shoulder arthroplasty<span> (TSA) and reverse TSA<span><span> (rTSA) being fundamentally different procedures, and indicated in different pathologies (rTSA for rotator cuff<span> deficiency [RCD] and proximal humeral fractures [PHFx] and anatomic TSA [aTSA] for glenohumeral </span></span>osteoarthritis<span> [GHOA]), they have the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (23472). This paper’s aim is to investigate differences in operative time and work-related value units (wRVUs) per hour among these pathologies, and ultimately determine if there is a need to assign separate CPTs for aTSA and rTSA.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort of data from the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was collected, all patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA (CPT: 23472) between the years of 2006 and 2019 for diagnoses of GHOA, RCD, and PHFx were included. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative time, and wRVUs per hour.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to GHOA (reference group), the average operative time for the RCD cohort was 12.242 minutes shorter (<em>P</em> < .001), while the wRVUs were higher by 1.627 (<em>P</em> < .001). The average operative time for rTSAs in the PHFx cohort were 17.615 minutes longer (<em>P</em> < .001), while the wRVUs were lower by 2.205 (<em>P</em> < .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The average operative time for rTSAs for both RCDs and PHFx were longer than that for aTSAs for GHOA. Additionally, wRVUs were lower for rTSAs for RCD and PHFx compared to aTSAs for GHOA. This elucidates inconsistency in reimbursement structure for the procedures, which should be revisited.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 663-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative time and relative value units for total shoulder arthroplasty based on pathology in the United States\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite total shoulder arthroplasty<span> (TSA) and reverse TSA<span><span> (rTSA) being fundamentally different procedures, and indicated in different pathologies (rTSA for rotator cuff<span> deficiency [RCD] and proximal humeral fractures [PHFx] and anatomic TSA [aTSA] for glenohumeral </span></span>osteoarthritis<span> [GHOA]), they have the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (23472). This paper’s aim is to investigate differences in operative time and work-related value units (wRVUs) per hour among these pathologies, and ultimately determine if there is a need to assign separate CPTs for aTSA and rTSA.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort of data from the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was collected, all patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA (CPT: 23472) between the years of 2006 and 2019 for diagnoses of GHOA, RCD, and PHFx were included. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative time, and wRVUs per hour.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to GHOA (reference group), the average operative time for the RCD cohort was 12.242 minutes shorter (<em>P</em> < .001), while the wRVUs were higher by 1.627 (<em>P</em> < .001). The average operative time for rTSAs in the PHFx cohort were 17.615 minutes longer (<em>P</em> < .001), while the wRVUs were lower by 2.205 (<em>P</em> < .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The average operative time for rTSAs for both RCDs and PHFx were longer than that for aTSAs for GHOA. Additionally, wRVUs were lower for rTSAs for RCD and PHFx compared to aTSAs for GHOA. This elucidates inconsistency in reimbursement structure for the procedures, which should be revisited.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 663-671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Operative time and relative value units for total shoulder arthroplasty based on pathology in the United States
Background
Despite total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) being fundamentally different procedures, and indicated in different pathologies (rTSA for rotator cuff deficiency [RCD] and proximal humeral fractures [PHFx] and anatomic TSA [aTSA] for glenohumeral osteoarthritis [GHOA]), they have the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (23472). This paper’s aim is to investigate differences in operative time and work-related value units (wRVUs) per hour among these pathologies, and ultimately determine if there is a need to assign separate CPTs for aTSA and rTSA.
Methods
A retrospective cohort of data from the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was collected, all patients who underwent aTSA or rTSA (CPT: 23472) between the years of 2006 and 2019 for diagnoses of GHOA, RCD, and PHFx were included. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative time, and wRVUs per hour.
Results
Compared to GHOA (reference group), the average operative time for the RCD cohort was 12.242 minutes shorter (P < .001), while the wRVUs were higher by 1.627 (P < .001). The average operative time for rTSAs in the PHFx cohort were 17.615 minutes longer (P < .001), while the wRVUs were lower by 2.205 (P < .001).
Conclusion
The average operative time for rTSAs for both RCDs and PHFx were longer than that for aTSAs for GHOA. Additionally, wRVUs were lower for rTSAs for RCD and PHFx compared to aTSAs for GHOA. This elucidates inconsistency in reimbursement structure for the procedures, which should be revisited.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.