{"title":"认识生态系统服务对可持续发展目标的贡献:可持续发展的生态基础","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is less than half the time left to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and progress toward SDGs is obviously insufficient. The contribution of ecosystem services (ES) to SDGs realization has received extensive attentions, but systematic generalization and recognition are still lacking. Based on a review of the progress and challenge of sustainable development, this study summarized ES’s potential contribution to 17 SDGs, and systematically reviewed empirical researches focused on the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES). The results showed that from the 1960s to the 2020s, the ES’s contribution has gradually become more important in sustainable development. ES has potential contribution to all SDGs, but the contribution to different SDGs varies. In the empirical study, ES’s contribution to SDG2, SDG6, SDG13, and SDG15 were strongly focused. ES’s contribution to SDG4, SDG5, SDG10, SDG16, and SDG17 were weakly focused. Most researches have explored the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on ES supply at a single scale, lacking attentions to ES demand and scale differences, and insufficient attentions to intervention factors affecting the ES’s contribution to SDGs. Faced with the above deficiencies, future research could deepen the exploration of ES’s contribution to SDGs from the following four perspectives: clarifying true contributions, exploring leverage point, integrating multi-scale differences, and focusing on intervention factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 511-525"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000373/pdfft?md5=9eeeaf052f93a628b39d268c43f9a859&pid=1-s2.0-S2666683924000373-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing ecosystem service's contribution to SDGs: Ecological foundation of sustainable development\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geosus.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is less than half the time left to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and progress toward SDGs is obviously insufficient. The contribution of ecosystem services (ES) to SDGs realization has received extensive attentions, but systematic generalization and recognition are still lacking. Based on a review of the progress and challenge of sustainable development, this study summarized ES’s potential contribution to 17 SDGs, and systematically reviewed empirical researches focused on the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES). The results showed that from the 1960s to the 2020s, the ES’s contribution has gradually become more important in sustainable development. ES has potential contribution to all SDGs, but the contribution to different SDGs varies. In the empirical study, ES’s contribution to SDG2, SDG6, SDG13, and SDG15 were strongly focused. ES’s contribution to SDG4, SDG5, SDG10, SDG16, and SDG17 were weakly focused. Most researches have explored the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on ES supply at a single scale, lacking attentions to ES demand and scale differences, and insufficient attentions to intervention factors affecting the ES’s contribution to SDGs. Faced with the above deficiencies, future research could deepen the exploration of ES’s contribution to SDGs from the following four perspectives: clarifying true contributions, exploring leverage point, integrating multi-scale differences, and focusing on intervention factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geography and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 511-525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000373/pdfft?md5=9eeeaf052f93a628b39d268c43f9a859&pid=1-s2.0-S2666683924000373-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geography and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000373\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
距离联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)的实现只剩下不到一半的时间,而实现可持续发展目标的进展明显不足。生态系统服务(ES)对实现可持续发展目标的贡献已受到广泛关注,但仍缺乏系统的归纳和认识。本研究在回顾可持续发展的进展与挑战的基础上,总结了生态系统服务对 17 个可持续发展目标的潜在贡献,并根据系统证据综合报告标准(ROSES)系统地回顾了以生态系统服务对可持续发展目标的贡献为重点的实证研究。结果表明,从 20 世纪 60 年代到 2020 年代,ES 在可持续发展中的贡献逐渐变得更加重要。环境科学对所有可持续发展目标都有潜在贡献,但对不同可持续发展目标的贡献各不相同。在实证研究中,ES 对 SDG2、SDG6、SDG13 和 SDG15 的贡献非常突出。ES 对 SDG4、SDG5、SDG10、SDG16 和 SDG17 的贡献较弱。大多数研究都是基于单一尺度的 ES 供给来探讨 ES 对 SDGs 的贡献,缺乏对 ES 需求和尺度差异的关注,对影响 ES 对 SDGs 贡献的干预因素关注不足。面对上述不足,未来的研究可以从以下四个方面深化ES对可持续发展目标贡献的探索:明确真实贡献、探索杠杆点、整合多尺度差异、关注干预因素。
Recognizing ecosystem service's contribution to SDGs: Ecological foundation of sustainable development
There is less than half the time left to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and progress toward SDGs is obviously insufficient. The contribution of ecosystem services (ES) to SDGs realization has received extensive attentions, but systematic generalization and recognition are still lacking. Based on a review of the progress and challenge of sustainable development, this study summarized ES’s potential contribution to 17 SDGs, and systematically reviewed empirical researches focused on the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES). The results showed that from the 1960s to the 2020s, the ES’s contribution has gradually become more important in sustainable development. ES has potential contribution to all SDGs, but the contribution to different SDGs varies. In the empirical study, ES’s contribution to SDG2, SDG6, SDG13, and SDG15 were strongly focused. ES’s contribution to SDG4, SDG5, SDG10, SDG16, and SDG17 were weakly focused. Most researches have explored the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on ES supply at a single scale, lacking attentions to ES demand and scale differences, and insufficient attentions to intervention factors affecting the ES’s contribution to SDGs. Faced with the above deficiencies, future research could deepen the exploration of ES’s contribution to SDGs from the following four perspectives: clarifying true contributions, exploring leverage point, integrating multi-scale differences, and focusing on intervention factors.
期刊介绍:
Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues.
Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes:
Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations;
Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability;
Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing;
Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.