Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Steven Cecchi, Mr Randeep Aujla, Mr Peter Annear, Mr Brendan Ricciardo, Mr Peter D’Alessandro
{"title":"一项随机对照试验，评估急性腘绳肌腱近端撕脱手术修复后的无支架和加速负重方案","authors":"Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Steven Cecchi, Mr Randeep Aujla, Mr Peter Annear, Mr Brendan Ricciardo, Mr Peter D’Alessandro","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Proximal hamstring tendon avulsion from the ischial tuberosity is a significant injury, with surgical repair advocated. After surgery, limited data exists regarding the optimal rehabilitation regime with extensive variation in published protocols. This study investigated patient outcomes following a traditionally conservative (CR) versus accelerated (AR) rehabilitation regimen after proximal hamstring tendon repair.\n \n \n \n This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 50 patients undergoing proximal hamstring tendon repair to either a braced, partial weight-bearing rehabilitation regime (CR=25) or an accelerated, unbraced regime, that permitted full weight-bearing as tolerated (AR=25). Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery, via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop tests were assessed at 6 and 12 months, as was peak isometric hamstring strength and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor torque.\n \n \n \n All PROMs improved (p>0.05) and, while the AR group reported a significantly better Physical Component Score for the SF-12 at 3 months (p=0.022), as well as a lower severity of hamstring pain at 12 months (p=0.032), there were no other group differences. Peak isometric hamstrings strength and peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings torque symmetry were all comparable between groups (p>0.05). While the AR group demonstrated significantly better (p=0.009) limb symmetry for the THD at 6 months, no other hop test differences were seen between groups. Three re-injuries have been observed (CR=2, AR=1).\n \n \n \n After proximal hamstring repair surgery, post-operative outcomes following an accelerated rehabilitation regimen were largely comparable to a traditionally conservative\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ASSESSING A BRACE-FREE AND ACCELERATED WEIGHT-BEARING PROTOCOL AFTER SURGICAL REPAIR OF ACUTE PROXIMAL HAMSTRING TENDON AVULSIONS\",\"authors\":\"Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Steven Cecchi, Mr Randeep Aujla, Mr Peter Annear, Mr Brendan Ricciardo, Mr Peter D’Alessandro\",\"doi\":\"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Proximal hamstring tendon avulsion from the ischial tuberosity is a significant injury, with surgical repair advocated. After surgery, limited data exists regarding the optimal rehabilitation regime with extensive variation in published protocols. This study investigated patient outcomes following a traditionally conservative (CR) versus accelerated (AR) rehabilitation regimen after proximal hamstring tendon repair.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 50 patients undergoing proximal hamstring tendon repair to either a braced, partial weight-bearing rehabilitation regime (CR=25) or an accelerated, unbraced regime, that permitted full weight-bearing as tolerated (AR=25). Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery, via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop tests were assessed at 6 and 12 months, as was peak isometric hamstring strength and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor torque.\\n \\n \\n \\n All PROMs improved (p>0.05) and, while the AR group reported a significantly better Physical Component Score for the SF-12 at 3 months (p=0.022), as well as a lower severity of hamstring pain at 12 months (p=0.032), there were no other group differences. Peak isometric hamstrings strength and peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings torque symmetry were all comparable between groups (p>0.05). While the AR group demonstrated significantly better (p=0.009) limb symmetry for the THD at 6 months, no other hop test differences were seen between groups. Three re-injuries have been observed (CR=2, AR=1).\\n \\n \\n \\n After proximal hamstring repair surgery, post-operative outcomes following an accelerated rehabilitation regimen were largely comparable to a traditionally conservative\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ASSESSING A BRACE-FREE AND ACCELERATED WEIGHT-BEARING PROTOCOL AFTER SURGICAL REPAIR OF ACUTE PROXIMAL HAMSTRING TENDON AVULSIONS
Proximal hamstring tendon avulsion from the ischial tuberosity is a significant injury, with surgical repair advocated. After surgery, limited data exists regarding the optimal rehabilitation regime with extensive variation in published protocols. This study investigated patient outcomes following a traditionally conservative (CR) versus accelerated (AR) rehabilitation regimen after proximal hamstring tendon repair.
This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 50 patients undergoing proximal hamstring tendon repair to either a braced, partial weight-bearing rehabilitation regime (CR=25) or an accelerated, unbraced regime, that permitted full weight-bearing as tolerated (AR=25). Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery, via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop tests were assessed at 6 and 12 months, as was peak isometric hamstring strength and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor torque.
All PROMs improved (p>0.05) and, while the AR group reported a significantly better Physical Component Score for the SF-12 at 3 months (p=0.022), as well as a lower severity of hamstring pain at 12 months (p=0.032), there were no other group differences. Peak isometric hamstrings strength and peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings torque symmetry were all comparable between groups (p>0.05). While the AR group demonstrated significantly better (p=0.009) limb symmetry for the THD at 6 months, no other hop test differences were seen between groups. Three re-injuries have been observed (CR=2, AR=1).
After proximal hamstring repair surgery, post-operative outcomes following an accelerated rehabilitation regimen were largely comparable to a traditionally conservative
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
