{"title":"关于自由的教训","authors":"A. Ciobotaru","doi":"10.35218/tco.2024.14.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research represents a form of expression of the need for exploration from which questions and reformulations arise, but also a way of assimilating fundamental \"lessons\", about the profession, about life; and – thus –, the story goes on. Thus, exploring the \"Horia Barbu Oprișan\" fund, within the archive of the \"Romanian Peasant Museum\" (MTR), in Bucharest, has implicitly allowed me to approach the labor behind the books about the history of popular theater (with or without puppets). In my mind, questions sprout through which I return to his most well-known works, Teatru fără scenă [Theater without a Stage] and Teatrul popular românesc [Romanian Popular Theater]. What was not included in the volumes? What remains in the sealed files with strings, like crosses of the researcher's destiny. In fact, the three puppeteers – Ion Perjan, Ghiță - Artist of the World, and Rudy (Rudolf) Nesvadba - whose profiles are outlined by Horia Barbu Oprișan, urge us to reflect on the necessity of rearranging information. The history of animation theater in Romania - a puzzle of unknown theatrical destinies, but which have often produced unforgettable emotions, invites a reevaluation of informative resources - more or less known. Each reader has their own perspective, born from their own concerns; each spectator has their own reception, born from personal searches; the lesson of freedom of choice represents a possible meeting point.","PeriodicalId":326041,"journal":{"name":"Theatrical Colloquia","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Regarding Liberty\",\"authors\":\"A. Ciobotaru\",\"doi\":\"10.35218/tco.2024.14.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research represents a form of expression of the need for exploration from which questions and reformulations arise, but also a way of assimilating fundamental \\\"lessons\\\", about the profession, about life; and – thus –, the story goes on. Thus, exploring the \\\"Horia Barbu Oprișan\\\" fund, within the archive of the \\\"Romanian Peasant Museum\\\" (MTR), in Bucharest, has implicitly allowed me to approach the labor behind the books about the history of popular theater (with or without puppets). In my mind, questions sprout through which I return to his most well-known works, Teatru fără scenă [Theater without a Stage] and Teatrul popular românesc [Romanian Popular Theater]. What was not included in the volumes? What remains in the sealed files with strings, like crosses of the researcher's destiny. In fact, the three puppeteers – Ion Perjan, Ghiță - Artist of the World, and Rudy (Rudolf) Nesvadba - whose profiles are outlined by Horia Barbu Oprișan, urge us to reflect on the necessity of rearranging information. The history of animation theater in Romania - a puzzle of unknown theatrical destinies, but which have often produced unforgettable emotions, invites a reevaluation of informative resources - more or less known. Each reader has their own perspective, born from their own concerns; each spectator has their own reception, born from personal searches; the lesson of freedom of choice represents a possible meeting point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theatrical Colloquia\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theatrical Colloquia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35218/tco.2024.14.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatrical Colloquia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35218/tco.2024.14.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究是表达探索需求的一种形式,从中产生问题和重新定义,同时也是吸收基本 "教训 "的一种方式,关于专业,关于生活;因此,故事还在继续。因此,对布加勒斯特 "罗马尼亚农民博物馆"(MTR)档案中的 "Horia Barbu Oprișan "基金的探索,隐含着让我接近有关流行戏剧(有木偶或无木偶)历史的书籍背后的劳动。在我的脑海中,萌生了一些问题,通过这些问题,我又回到了他最著名的作品《没有舞台的剧院》和《罗马尼亚通俗剧院》。这两卷中没有包括什么?是那些带着线的密封文件,就像研究者命运的十字架。事实上,霍里亚-巴尔布-奥普里桑所概述的三位木偶艺术家--扬-佩尔扬(Ion Perjan)、《世界艺术家》(Ghiță - Artist of the World)和鲁迪-内斯瓦德巴(Rudy (Rudolf) Nesvadba)--的简介促使我们反思重新整理信息的必要性。罗马尼亚的动画戏剧史--一个充满未知戏剧命运的谜团,却常常产生令人难忘的情感,需要我们重新评估或多或少已知的信息资源。每个读者都有自己的视角,源于自己的关注;每个观众都有自己的接受,源于个人的探索;自由选择的课程代表了一个可能的交汇点。
Research represents a form of expression of the need for exploration from which questions and reformulations arise, but also a way of assimilating fundamental "lessons", about the profession, about life; and – thus –, the story goes on. Thus, exploring the "Horia Barbu Oprișan" fund, within the archive of the "Romanian Peasant Museum" (MTR), in Bucharest, has implicitly allowed me to approach the labor behind the books about the history of popular theater (with or without puppets). In my mind, questions sprout through which I return to his most well-known works, Teatru fără scenă [Theater without a Stage] and Teatrul popular românesc [Romanian Popular Theater]. What was not included in the volumes? What remains in the sealed files with strings, like crosses of the researcher's destiny. In fact, the three puppeteers – Ion Perjan, Ghiță - Artist of the World, and Rudy (Rudolf) Nesvadba - whose profiles are outlined by Horia Barbu Oprișan, urge us to reflect on the necessity of rearranging information. The history of animation theater in Romania - a puzzle of unknown theatrical destinies, but which have often produced unforgettable emotions, invites a reevaluation of informative resources - more or less known. Each reader has their own perspective, born from their own concerns; each spectator has their own reception, born from personal searches; the lesson of freedom of choice represents a possible meeting point.