T.P. John , J.T. Stewart , R.J. Poole , A. Kowalski , C.P. Fonte
{"title":"比较 FENE-P、sPTT 和 Giesekus 模型流体在螺旋静态混合器中的流动情况","authors":"T.P. John , J.T. Stewart , R.J. Poole , A. Kowalski , C.P. Fonte","doi":"10.1016/j.jnnfm.2024.105249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Helical static mixers are used widely for mixing of non-Newtonian fluid flows in the laminar regime. We study flows of three viscoelastic constitutive models (sPTT, FENE-P, and Giesekus) in the helical static mixer using computational fluid dynamics. These three models have similarities in steady viscometric flows in that they all exhibit shear thinning and their planar extensional viscosities can be matched, but their responses can differ in complex geometries. We observe flow distribution asymmetries at the element intersections for all three models, which hinders the mixing performance of the device. These have previously been observed with the constant shear viscosity FENE-CR model. The asymmetry behaves similarly between the sPTT and Giesekus models, however the FENE-P model behaves in a distinct manner; beyond a critical degree of elasticity, the asymmetry sharply changes direction. This was also observed previously with the FENE-CR model. These results suggest that shear thinning and second-normal stress differences (present in the Giesekus model) do not significantly influence mixing performance in the range of conditions studied. We show that increasing the aspect (length/diameter) ratio of the mixer elements mitigates the poor mixing caused by elasticity. Overall, this study provides insight into the behaviour of these well-used constitutive models in complex, industrially-relevant flows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54782,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics","volume":"329 ","pages":"Article 105249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702572400065X/pdfft?md5=0eebb93da631ec40576abb91ba0feccf&pid=1-s2.0-S037702572400065X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing flows of FENE-P, sPTT, and Giesekus model fluids in a helical static mixer\",\"authors\":\"T.P. John , J.T. Stewart , R.J. Poole , A. Kowalski , C.P. Fonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnnfm.2024.105249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Helical static mixers are used widely for mixing of non-Newtonian fluid flows in the laminar regime. We study flows of three viscoelastic constitutive models (sPTT, FENE-P, and Giesekus) in the helical static mixer using computational fluid dynamics. These three models have similarities in steady viscometric flows in that they all exhibit shear thinning and their planar extensional viscosities can be matched, but their responses can differ in complex geometries. We observe flow distribution asymmetries at the element intersections for all three models, which hinders the mixing performance of the device. These have previously been observed with the constant shear viscosity FENE-CR model. The asymmetry behaves similarly between the sPTT and Giesekus models, however the FENE-P model behaves in a distinct manner; beyond a critical degree of elasticity, the asymmetry sharply changes direction. This was also observed previously with the FENE-CR model. These results suggest that shear thinning and second-normal stress differences (present in the Giesekus model) do not significantly influence mixing performance in the range of conditions studied. We show that increasing the aspect (length/diameter) ratio of the mixer elements mitigates the poor mixing caused by elasticity. Overall, this study provides insight into the behaviour of these well-used constitutive models in complex, industrially-relevant flows.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"329 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702572400065X/pdfft?md5=0eebb93da631ec40576abb91ba0feccf&pid=1-s2.0-S037702572400065X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702572400065X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702572400065X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing flows of FENE-P, sPTT, and Giesekus model fluids in a helical static mixer
Helical static mixers are used widely for mixing of non-Newtonian fluid flows in the laminar regime. We study flows of three viscoelastic constitutive models (sPTT, FENE-P, and Giesekus) in the helical static mixer using computational fluid dynamics. These three models have similarities in steady viscometric flows in that they all exhibit shear thinning and their planar extensional viscosities can be matched, but their responses can differ in complex geometries. We observe flow distribution asymmetries at the element intersections for all three models, which hinders the mixing performance of the device. These have previously been observed with the constant shear viscosity FENE-CR model. The asymmetry behaves similarly between the sPTT and Giesekus models, however the FENE-P model behaves in a distinct manner; beyond a critical degree of elasticity, the asymmetry sharply changes direction. This was also observed previously with the FENE-CR model. These results suggest that shear thinning and second-normal stress differences (present in the Giesekus model) do not significantly influence mixing performance in the range of conditions studied. We show that increasing the aspect (length/diameter) ratio of the mixer elements mitigates the poor mixing caused by elasticity. Overall, this study provides insight into the behaviour of these well-used constitutive models in complex, industrially-relevant flows.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics publishes research on flowing soft matter systems. Submissions in all areas of flowing complex fluids are welcomed, including polymer melts and solutions, suspensions, colloids, surfactant solutions, biological fluids, gels, liquid crystals and granular materials. Flow problems relevant to microfluidics, lab-on-a-chip, nanofluidics, biological flows, geophysical flows, industrial processes and other applications are of interest.
Subjects considered suitable for the journal include the following (not necessarily in order of importance):
Theoretical, computational and experimental studies of naturally or technologically relevant flow problems where the non-Newtonian nature of the fluid is important in determining the character of the flow. We seek in particular studies that lend mechanistic insight into flow behavior in complex fluids or highlight flow phenomena unique to complex fluids. Examples include
Instabilities, unsteady and turbulent or chaotic flow characteristics in non-Newtonian fluids,
Multiphase flows involving complex fluids,
Problems involving transport phenomena such as heat and mass transfer and mixing, to the extent that the non-Newtonian flow behavior is central to the transport phenomena,
Novel flow situations that suggest the need for further theoretical study,
Practical situations of flow that are in need of systematic theoretical and experimental research. Such issues and developments commonly arise, for example, in the polymer processing, petroleum, pharmaceutical, biomedical and consumer product industries.