{"title":"英语研究中的马克罗比乌斯","authors":"Maya Petrova","doi":"10.32880/2587-7127-2024-8-8-110-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the principal English-language studies of the last century focused on exploring the personality of Macrobius (5th century) and his works — Saturnalia (Saturnalia [ed. Willis, 1963]), Commentary on the 'Dream of Scipio' (Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis [ed. Willis, 1963]), and On the differences and similarities of Greek and Latin verbs (De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerpta [ed. De Paolis, 1990]), written for educational purposes and representing a compendium of Greek knowledge. Interest in Macrobius's creative legacy notably intensified towards the end of the 19th century, a trend linked to the release of critical editions of Macrobian texts and their subsequent translations into French. In particular, the study analyzes the research of Thomas Whittaker (Macrobius; or philosophy, science and letters in the year 400; published in 1923), William Harris Stahl (Macrobius, Commentary on the ‘Dream of Scipio’, published in 1952), Alan Cameron (The date and identity of Macrobius [published in 1966] and Macrobius, Avienus, and Avianus [published in 1967]), Herman De Ley (Macrobius and Numenius. A study of Macrobius, ‘In Somn.’ I, c. 12; published in 1972), Stephen Gersh (Middle platonism and neoplatonism, the Latin tradition; published in 1986), Roger A. Pack (A medieval critic of Macrobius’ cosmometrics; published in 1981), Alison Peden (Science and philosophy in Wales at the time of the Norman conquest: a Macrobius manuscript from Llabadarn; published in 1981), among others. It highlights the primary issues that researchers have focused on when studying Macrobius's literary legacy, identifies the challenges in analyzing his works, and acknowledges the contribution of English-speaking scholars to the global historiography.","PeriodicalId":32993,"journal":{"name":"Hypothekai","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macrobius in english-language research\",\"authors\":\"Maya Petrova\",\"doi\":\"10.32880/2587-7127-2024-8-8-110-134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the principal English-language studies of the last century focused on exploring the personality of Macrobius (5th century) and his works — Saturnalia (Saturnalia [ed. Willis, 1963]), Commentary on the 'Dream of Scipio' (Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis [ed. Willis, 1963]), and On the differences and similarities of Greek and Latin verbs (De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerpta [ed. De Paolis, 1990]), written for educational purposes and representing a compendium of Greek knowledge. Interest in Macrobius's creative legacy notably intensified towards the end of the 19th century, a trend linked to the release of critical editions of Macrobian texts and their subsequent translations into French. In particular, the study analyzes the research of Thomas Whittaker (Macrobius; or philosophy, science and letters in the year 400; published in 1923), William Harris Stahl (Macrobius, Commentary on the ‘Dream of Scipio’, published in 1952), Alan Cameron (The date and identity of Macrobius [published in 1966] and Macrobius, Avienus, and Avianus [published in 1967]), Herman De Ley (Macrobius and Numenius. A study of Macrobius, ‘In Somn.’ I, c. 12; published in 1972), Stephen Gersh (Middle platonism and neoplatonism, the Latin tradition; published in 1986), Roger A. Pack (A medieval critic of Macrobius’ cosmometrics; published in 1981), Alison Peden (Science and philosophy in Wales at the time of the Norman conquest: a Macrobius manuscript from Llabadarn; published in 1981), among others. It highlights the primary issues that researchers have focused on when studying Macrobius's literary legacy, identifies the challenges in analyzing his works, and acknowledges the contribution of English-speaking scholars to the global historiography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypothekai\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypothekai\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32880/2587-7127-2024-8-8-110-134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypothekai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32880/2587-7127-2024-8-8-110-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文章探讨了上个世纪的主要英文研究,这些研究侧重于探索马克罗比乌斯(5 世纪)的个性及其作品--《撒土纳利亚》(Saturnalia [编者:Willis,1963 年])、《西庇阿之梦评注》(Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis [编者:Willis,1963 年])和《论希腊和拉丁动词的异同》(De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerpta [编者:De Paolis,1963 年])。Willis,1963 年])和《论希腊和拉丁动词的异同》(De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerpta [De Paolis,1990 年])。19 世纪末,人们对马克罗比乌斯创造性遗产的兴趣明显增强,这一趋势与马克罗比乌斯文本的批判性版本及其随后的法文译本的发行有关。本研究特别分析了托马斯-惠特克(Thomas Whittaker)(《马克罗比乌斯;或 400 年中的哲学、科学和文学》,1923 年出版)、威廉-哈里斯-斯塔尔(William Harris Stahl)(《马克罗比乌斯,对 "西庇阿之梦 "的评论》,1952 年出版)、艾伦-卡梅伦(《马克罗比乌斯的日期和身份》[1966 年出版] 和《马克罗比乌斯、阿维尼乌斯和阿维尼乌斯》[1967 年出版])、赫尔曼-德莱(《马克罗比乌斯和努米尼乌斯》。马克罗比乌斯研究》,"In Somn.I, c. 12;1972 年出版)、Stephen Gersh(《中世纪柏拉图主义和新柏拉图主义,拉丁传统》;1986 年出版)、Roger A. Pack(《马克罗比乌斯宇宙论的中世纪批评家》;1981 年出版)、Alison Peden(《诺曼征服时期威尔士的科学与哲学:来自 Llabadarn 的马克罗比乌斯手稿》;1981 年出版)等。该书强调了研究人员在研究马克罗比乌斯文学遗产时关注的主要问题,指出了分析其作品时面临的挑战,并肯定了英语学者对全球史学的贡献。
The article examines the principal English-language studies of the last century focused on exploring the personality of Macrobius (5th century) and his works — Saturnalia (Saturnalia [ed. Willis, 1963]), Commentary on the 'Dream of Scipio' (Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis [ed. Willis, 1963]), and On the differences and similarities of Greek and Latin verbs (De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerpta [ed. De Paolis, 1990]), written for educational purposes and representing a compendium of Greek knowledge. Interest in Macrobius's creative legacy notably intensified towards the end of the 19th century, a trend linked to the release of critical editions of Macrobian texts and their subsequent translations into French. In particular, the study analyzes the research of Thomas Whittaker (Macrobius; or philosophy, science and letters in the year 400; published in 1923), William Harris Stahl (Macrobius, Commentary on the ‘Dream of Scipio’, published in 1952), Alan Cameron (The date and identity of Macrobius [published in 1966] and Macrobius, Avienus, and Avianus [published in 1967]), Herman De Ley (Macrobius and Numenius. A study of Macrobius, ‘In Somn.’ I, c. 12; published in 1972), Stephen Gersh (Middle platonism and neoplatonism, the Latin tradition; published in 1986), Roger A. Pack (A medieval critic of Macrobius’ cosmometrics; published in 1981), Alison Peden (Science and philosophy in Wales at the time of the Norman conquest: a Macrobius manuscript from Llabadarn; published in 1981), among others. It highlights the primary issues that researchers have focused on when studying Macrobius's literary legacy, identifies the challenges in analyzing his works, and acknowledges the contribution of English-speaking scholars to the global historiography.