登山滑雪运动中鞋跟高度对运动学和肌肉活动的影响--一项实地研究

Claudio R. Nigg, T. Stöggl, Hermann Schwameder, Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Daniel Turczyn, David Graham, Michael Lasshofer, John Seifert
{"title":"登山滑雪运动中鞋跟高度对运动学和肌肉活动的影响--一项实地研究","authors":"Claudio R. Nigg, T. Stöggl, Hermann Schwameder, Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Daniel Turczyn, David Graham, Michael Lasshofer, John Seifert","doi":"10.36950/2024.3ciss005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nThe ski binding plays an important role in ski mountaineering. When traveling uphill, the binding has an adjustable heel height known as the riser. Previous laboratory research reported joint kinematics and kinetics are influenced by riser height, however little is known about changes to muscle activity associated with differing joint motion. The purpose of this work was to assess riser height influence on kinematics and muscle activity at different slopes during on-snow skiing.\nMethods\nThree female and nine male recreational ski mountaineers (19-26 y) were tested on 5o and 16o gradients using no riser (0 cm) and riser (5.3 cm) at a submaximal 80% HRmax. Each subject used Backland 85 UL skis and Backland Bindings (Atomic Skis, Altenmarkt, Austria). Subjects skied for 6 min at each binding setting with the last 10 gait-cycles evaluating lower limb joint motion gathered from 2D-sagittal plane motion capture. Electromyography (EMG) collected unilaterally on the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, medial gastrocnemius and triceps brachii also.\nResults\n5o slope: hip range of motion (ROM) decreased (p = .003), ankle ROM decreased (p = .005), stride length decreased (p = .004), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) increased (p = .02) for riser compared to no riser. At 16o slope: hip ROM decreased (p = .001), and RPE decreased (p = .004) for riser compared to no riser. HR, glide distance, velocity, EMG, and net mechanical efficiency were not different between riser heights on either slope.\nDiscussion/Conclusion\nLower body joint kinematics, step length and RPE varied significantly with riser height. Kinematic differences did not impact velocity or muscle activity when controlling pace. These results agree with previous findings showing minimal differences in EMG and HR while lower body kinematics and RPE changed with riser height.","PeriodicalId":508861,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"17 52","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heel riser height influence on kinematics and muscle activity of ski mountaineering – A field based study\",\"authors\":\"Claudio R. Nigg, T. Stöggl, Hermann Schwameder, Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Daniel Turczyn, David Graham, Michael Lasshofer, John Seifert\",\"doi\":\"10.36950/2024.3ciss005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction\\nThe ski binding plays an important role in ski mountaineering. When traveling uphill, the binding has an adjustable heel height known as the riser. Previous laboratory research reported joint kinematics and kinetics are influenced by riser height, however little is known about changes to muscle activity associated with differing joint motion. The purpose of this work was to assess riser height influence on kinematics and muscle activity at different slopes during on-snow skiing.\\nMethods\\nThree female and nine male recreational ski mountaineers (19-26 y) were tested on 5o and 16o gradients using no riser (0 cm) and riser (5.3 cm) at a submaximal 80% HRmax. Each subject used Backland 85 UL skis and Backland Bindings (Atomic Skis, Altenmarkt, Austria). Subjects skied for 6 min at each binding setting with the last 10 gait-cycles evaluating lower limb joint motion gathered from 2D-sagittal plane motion capture. Electromyography (EMG) collected unilaterally on the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, medial gastrocnemius and triceps brachii also.\\nResults\\n5o slope: hip range of motion (ROM) decreased (p = .003), ankle ROM decreased (p = .005), stride length decreased (p = .004), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) increased (p = .02) for riser compared to no riser. At 16o slope: hip ROM decreased (p = .001), and RPE decreased (p = .004) for riser compared to no riser. HR, glide distance, velocity, EMG, and net mechanical efficiency were not different between riser heights on either slope.\\nDiscussion/Conclusion\\nLower body joint kinematics, step length and RPE varied significantly with riser height. Kinematic differences did not impact velocity or muscle activity when controlling pace. These results agree with previous findings showing minimal differences in EMG and HR while lower body kinematics and RPE changed with riser height.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)\",\"volume\":\"17 52\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.3ciss005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.3ciss005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言滑雪板固定器在滑雪登山运动中发挥着重要作用。在上坡时,滑雪板绑带有一个可调节的后跟高度,即 "立管"。以前的实验室研究表明,关节运动学和动力学会受到立管高度的影响,但人们对与不同关节运动相关的肌肉活动变化知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估在雪上滑雪时,立管高度对不同坡度的运动学和肌肉活动的影响。方法对三名女性和九名男性休闲登山滑雪者(19-26 岁)进行了坡度分别为 5o 和 16o 的测试,测试时未使用立管(0 厘米)和立管(5.3 厘米),最大心率为次极限的 80%。每位受试者都使用了 Backland 85 UL 滑雪板和 Backland 双板夹具(Atomic 滑雪板,奥地利 Altenmarkt)。受试者在每种绑带设置下滑雪 6 分钟,最后 10 个步态周期评估通过二维矢状面运动捕捉收集的下肢关节运动。结果5o坡度:与无坡度相比,有坡度者髋关节活动范围(ROM)减小(p = .003),踝关节活动范围减小(p = .005),步长减小(p = .004),体力感知评分(RPE)增加(p = .02)。坡度为 16 度时:与不爬坡相比,爬坡者的髋关节 ROM 减少(p = .001),RPE 减少(p = .004)。讨论/结论 下半身关节运动学、步长和 RPE 随立管高度的变化而显著不同。在控制步伐时,运动学差异不会影响速度或肌肉活动。这些结果与之前的研究结果一致,即下半身运动学和 RPE 随立管高度变化时,EMG 和 HR 的差异极小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heel riser height influence on kinematics and muscle activity of ski mountaineering – A field based study
Introduction The ski binding plays an important role in ski mountaineering. When traveling uphill, the binding has an adjustable heel height known as the riser. Previous laboratory research reported joint kinematics and kinetics are influenced by riser height, however little is known about changes to muscle activity associated with differing joint motion. The purpose of this work was to assess riser height influence on kinematics and muscle activity at different slopes during on-snow skiing. Methods Three female and nine male recreational ski mountaineers (19-26 y) were tested on 5o and 16o gradients using no riser (0 cm) and riser (5.3 cm) at a submaximal 80% HRmax. Each subject used Backland 85 UL skis and Backland Bindings (Atomic Skis, Altenmarkt, Austria). Subjects skied for 6 min at each binding setting with the last 10 gait-cycles evaluating lower limb joint motion gathered from 2D-sagittal plane motion capture. Electromyography (EMG) collected unilaterally on the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, medial gastrocnemius and triceps brachii also. Results 5o slope: hip range of motion (ROM) decreased (p = .003), ankle ROM decreased (p = .005), stride length decreased (p = .004), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) increased (p = .02) for riser compared to no riser. At 16o slope: hip ROM decreased (p = .001), and RPE decreased (p = .004) for riser compared to no riser. HR, glide distance, velocity, EMG, and net mechanical efficiency were not different between riser heights on either slope. Discussion/Conclusion Lower body joint kinematics, step length and RPE varied significantly with riser height. Kinematic differences did not impact velocity or muscle activity when controlling pace. These results agree with previous findings showing minimal differences in EMG and HR while lower body kinematics and RPE changed with riser height.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信