老年移民家庭护理类型:护理接受者和护理提供者的观点

Patricia Yocie Hierofani, Micheline van Riemsdijk
{"title":"老年移民家庭护理类型:护理接受者和护理提供者的观点","authors":"Patricia Yocie Hierofani, Micheline van Riemsdijk","doi":"10.1108/ijmhsc-06-2022-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAs populations are ageing and the global average life expectancy is rising, the provision of care for older people is an increasingly salient issue. This paper aims to focus on family-provided care for older immigrants, examining how older immigrants and care providers experience and construct family caregiving.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on interviews with care recipients, family care providers, municipal staff and representatives for migrant organisations in Sweden, this study presents a typology of family caregiving for older immigrants.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found three caregiving types, namely, solely family-provided care and a combination of family care and public care (predominantly one or the other). The decision to select family-provided or publicly-funded care depends on personal and institutional factors.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper makes three empirical contributions to the literature on care provision for older immigrants. Firstly, this study provides insights into the structural and personal factors that shape care-giving arrangements for older immigrants. Secondly, this study examines the perspectives of care recipients and care providers on family-provided care. Care expectations differ between both groups and sometimes result in intergenerational disagreement. Thirdly, in terms of institutional support, this study finds that the Swedish state’s notion of individual needs does not match the needs of immigrant elderly and their caregivers. The paper places the care types in a broader discussion about eldercare provision in the Swedish welfare state, which has experienced a decline in publicly funded care services and an increase in family caregiving in the past 30 years. In addition, it addresses questions of dignified ageing from a minority perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":503778,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A typology of family caregiving for older immigrants: perspectives from care receivers and care providers\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Yocie Hierofani, Micheline van Riemsdijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijmhsc-06-2022-0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nAs populations are ageing and the global average life expectancy is rising, the provision of care for older people is an increasingly salient issue. This paper aims to focus on family-provided care for older immigrants, examining how older immigrants and care providers experience and construct family caregiving.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nBased on interviews with care recipients, family care providers, municipal staff and representatives for migrant organisations in Sweden, this study presents a typology of family caregiving for older immigrants.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe authors found three caregiving types, namely, solely family-provided care and a combination of family care and public care (predominantly one or the other). The decision to select family-provided or publicly-funded care depends on personal and institutional factors.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe paper makes three empirical contributions to the literature on care provision for older immigrants. Firstly, this study provides insights into the structural and personal factors that shape care-giving arrangements for older immigrants. Secondly, this study examines the perspectives of care recipients and care providers on family-provided care. Care expectations differ between both groups and sometimes result in intergenerational disagreement. Thirdly, in terms of institutional support, this study finds that the Swedish state’s notion of individual needs does not match the needs of immigrant elderly and their caregivers. The paper places the care types in a broader discussion about eldercare provision in the Swedish welfare state, which has experienced a decline in publicly funded care services and an increase in family caregiving in the past 30 years. In addition, it addresses questions of dignified ageing from a minority perspective.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-06-2022-0063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-06-2022-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 随着人口老龄化和全球平均预期寿命的延长,为老年人提供护理是一个日益突出的问题。本文旨在关注家庭为老年移民提供的护理,研究老年移民和护理提供者如何体验和构建家庭护理。研究结果作者发现了三种护理类型,即完全由家庭提供的护理,以及家庭护理和公共护理的结合(主要是其中一种或另一种)。选择家庭提供的护理还是公共资助的护理取决于个人和制度因素。首先,本研究深入探讨了影响老年移民护理安排的结构性和个人因素。其次,本研究探讨了护理接受者和护理提供者对家庭提供的护理的看法。两个群体对护理的期望各不相同,有时甚至会导致代际分歧。第三,在机构支持方面,本研究发现瑞典政府的个人需求概念与移民老人及其照顾者的需求并不一致。在过去的 30 年中,瑞典福利国家的公共资助护理服务有所减少,而家庭护理服务则有所增加,本文将护理类型置于有关瑞典福利国家提供的老年人护理服务的更广泛讨论中。此外,本文还从少数群体的角度探讨了有尊严的老龄化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A typology of family caregiving for older immigrants: perspectives from care receivers and care providers
Purpose As populations are ageing and the global average life expectancy is rising, the provision of care for older people is an increasingly salient issue. This paper aims to focus on family-provided care for older immigrants, examining how older immigrants and care providers experience and construct family caregiving. Design/methodology/approach Based on interviews with care recipients, family care providers, municipal staff and representatives for migrant organisations in Sweden, this study presents a typology of family caregiving for older immigrants. Findings The authors found three caregiving types, namely, solely family-provided care and a combination of family care and public care (predominantly one or the other). The decision to select family-provided or publicly-funded care depends on personal and institutional factors. Originality/value The paper makes three empirical contributions to the literature on care provision for older immigrants. Firstly, this study provides insights into the structural and personal factors that shape care-giving arrangements for older immigrants. Secondly, this study examines the perspectives of care recipients and care providers on family-provided care. Care expectations differ between both groups and sometimes result in intergenerational disagreement. Thirdly, in terms of institutional support, this study finds that the Swedish state’s notion of individual needs does not match the needs of immigrant elderly and their caregivers. The paper places the care types in a broader discussion about eldercare provision in the Swedish welfare state, which has experienced a decline in publicly funded care services and an increase in family caregiving in the past 30 years. In addition, it addresses questions of dignified ageing from a minority perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信