美洛昔康和普利迭醇联合疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛疗效的真实世界数据

Marwan Mahtook, Maiss Saadi, Saifan Alhameedawi, Noor M. Obaid,  Khulood Alsaraf
{"title":"美洛昔康和普利迭醇联合疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛疗效的真实世界数据","authors":"Marwan Mahtook, Maiss Saadi, Saifan Alhameedawi, Noor M. Obaid,  Khulood Alsaraf","doi":"10.61873/kmkm8961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Musculoskeletal pain includes several types of discomfort associated with the skeletal system. Pharmaceutically, pridinol was developed in order to relax muscles. No empirical data exist to support the effectiveness of using meloxicam in combination therapy for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study compared pridinol and meloxicam for musculoskeletal pain. The current observational study assessed a total of 82 patients. The study’s participants were divided into three groups: the “meloxicam” group, the “pridinol” group, and the “meloxicam + pridinol” group. Pain levels were measured before and four weeks after giving the drug, by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We employed a Kruskal-Wallis test in order to evaluate the variations in pain measurement among the groups. The three groups’ VAS and WOMAC scores did not differ before the drug administration. The “meloxicam + pridinol” treatment resulted in significant pain relief based on VAS and WOMAC scores at 1, 2, and 4 weeks (as compared to other groups; p<0.05). At 4 weeks, the VAS and WOMAC ratings exhibited no significant pain relief in the “meloxicam” group when compared to the “pridinol” group. The meloxicam-pridinol combination proved efficacious for musculoskeletal pain, and is recom¬mended for its therapy.","PeriodicalId":515365,"journal":{"name":"Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics - International Edition","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world data on the effectiveness of the meloxicam and pridinol combination for musculoskeletal pain\",\"authors\":\"Marwan Mahtook, Maiss Saadi, Saifan Alhameedawi, Noor M. Obaid,  Khulood Alsaraf\",\"doi\":\"10.61873/kmkm8961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Musculoskeletal pain includes several types of discomfort associated with the skeletal system. Pharmaceutically, pridinol was developed in order to relax muscles. No empirical data exist to support the effectiveness of using meloxicam in combination therapy for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study compared pridinol and meloxicam for musculoskeletal pain. The current observational study assessed a total of 82 patients. The study’s participants were divided into three groups: the “meloxicam” group, the “pridinol” group, and the “meloxicam + pridinol” group. Pain levels were measured before and four weeks after giving the drug, by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We employed a Kruskal-Wallis test in order to evaluate the variations in pain measurement among the groups. The three groups’ VAS and WOMAC scores did not differ before the drug administration. The “meloxicam + pridinol” treatment resulted in significant pain relief based on VAS and WOMAC scores at 1, 2, and 4 weeks (as compared to other groups; p<0.05). At 4 weeks, the VAS and WOMAC ratings exhibited no significant pain relief in the “meloxicam” group when compared to the “pridinol” group. The meloxicam-pridinol combination proved efficacious for musculoskeletal pain, and is recom¬mended for its therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics - International Edition\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics - International Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61873/kmkm8961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics - International Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61873/kmkm8961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉骨骼疼痛包括几种与骨骼系统有关的不适。从药理上讲,开发普利迭醇是为了放松肌肉。目前还没有实证数据支持使用美洛昔康联合疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的有效性。本研究比较了普利迭醇和美洛昔康治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的效果。本次观察性研究共对 82 名患者进行了评估。研究参与者被分为三组:"美洛昔康 "组、"普利迪诺 "组和 "美洛昔康+普利迪诺 "组。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)测量服药前和服药四周后的疼痛程度。我们采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验来评估各组之间疼痛测量的差异。三组的 VAS 和 WOMAC 评分在用药前没有差异。与其他组相比,"美洛昔康+普利洛尔 "治疗组在1周、2周和4周时的VAS和WOMAC评分显著减轻了疼痛(P<0.05)。与 "普利啶醇 "组相比,"美洛昔康 "组在4周时的VAS和WOMAC评分显示疼痛无明显缓解。事实证明,美洛昔康-普利类诺联合疗法对肌肉骨骼疼痛具有疗效,建议用于治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world data on the effectiveness of the meloxicam and pridinol combination for musculoskeletal pain
Musculoskeletal pain includes several types of discomfort associated with the skeletal system. Pharmaceutically, pridinol was developed in order to relax muscles. No empirical data exist to support the effectiveness of using meloxicam in combination therapy for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study compared pridinol and meloxicam for musculoskeletal pain. The current observational study assessed a total of 82 patients. The study’s participants were divided into three groups: the “meloxicam” group, the “pridinol” group, and the “meloxicam + pridinol” group. Pain levels were measured before and four weeks after giving the drug, by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We employed a Kruskal-Wallis test in order to evaluate the variations in pain measurement among the groups. The three groups’ VAS and WOMAC scores did not differ before the drug administration. The “meloxicam + pridinol” treatment resulted in significant pain relief based on VAS and WOMAC scores at 1, 2, and 4 weeks (as compared to other groups; p<0.05). At 4 weeks, the VAS and WOMAC ratings exhibited no significant pain relief in the “meloxicam” group when compared to the “pridinol” group. The meloxicam-pridinol combination proved efficacious for musculoskeletal pain, and is recom¬mended for its therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信